Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PALASTREN El-Mashlahah JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Walisongo Law Review (Walrev)
Briliyan Erna Wati
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEKERJA RUMAH TANGGA Wati, Briliyan Erna
PALASTREN Vol 5, No 2 (2012): Jurnal Palastren (Juli - Desember)
Publisher : PALASTREN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Household Workers (PRT) are marginal groups which are the most vulnerable to the abuse of the employer. This proved by the absence of legal clarity or protection for their work. Constitutional Guarantees as a form of state contracts in order to provide Economical and Social protection as well as justice and welfare for human including domestic workers should be a fundamental regulation since Indonesian independence. The existence of normative , legal and even practical reasons to strengthen the argument that the protection of the law for domestic workers should be regulated in the legislation specifically in Drafts or Bill on Protection of Household Workers. Keywords: household workers, legal protection
DIMENSI-DIMENSI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEKERJA RUMAH TANGGA DI ERA INDUSTRIALISAI Wati, Briliyan Erna
PALASTREN Vol 7, No 1 (2014): PALASTREN
Publisher : STAIN Kudus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pekerja Rumah Tangga (PRT) adalah kelompok marginalyang paling rentan terhadap kelalaian yang dilakukanoleh majikan. Hal ini terbukti dengan tidak adanyakejelasan hukum atau perlindungan bagi status mereka.Seharusnya jaminan konstitusional sebagai bentukkepedulian negara untuk memberikan perlindunganekonomi, sosial serta keadilan dan kesejahteraan bagipekerja rumah tangga sudah ada sejak kemerdekaanIndonesia. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menunjukkanbetapa pentingnya regulasi perlindungan pekerjarumah tangga. Temuan dari artikel ini adalah bahwaada berbagai alasan baik normatif, hukum dan bahkanpraktis yang menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukumbagi pekerja rumah tangga harus diatur dalam undangundangkhusus dan harus direalisasikan. Pertama,keberadaan undang-undang tentang pekerja rumah tangga sebagai bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja rumah tangga sebagai titik tolak bagi pemerintah untuksecara bertahap merubah status hukum Pekerja RumahTangga (sebagai pekerja non formal) menjadi pekerja formal. Pergeseran ini penting karena itu berdampakpositif pada nilai ekonomi mereka.kata kunci: Pekerja Rumah Tangga, PerlindunganHukum, Peraturan Household Workers (PRT) are marginal groups whichare the most vulnerable to the abuse of the employer.This proved by the absence of legal clarity or protectionfor their work. Constitutional Guarantees  as a formof  state contracts in order to provide Economical andSocial protection as well as justice and welfare for humanincluding domestic workers should be a fundamentalregulation since Indonesian independence. This articleaimed to show how important is the regulation in terms ofhousehold worker protection. The finding of this article isthat the existence of normative , legal and even practicalreasons to strengthen the argument that the protection ofthe law for domestic workers should be regulated in thelegislation specifically in  Drafts or Bill on Protection of Household Workers. There are many reasons strengthenthe argument that the protection of the law againstHousehold Workers (PRT) should be realized. First, theexistence of legislation on domestic workers as a form oflegal protection for domestic workers as a strating pointfor the government to gradually bring the HouseholdWorkers (as non formal workers) into formal workers.This shift is important because of it’s positive impact on their economic value.keywords: household workers, legal protection, legislation
DIMENSI-DIMENSI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEKERJA RUMAH TANGGA DI ERA INDUSTRIALISAI Wati, Briliyan Erna
PALASTREN Jurnal Studi Gender Vol 7, No 1 (2014): PALASTREN
Publisher : STAIN Kudus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/palastren.v7i1.1002

Abstract

Pekerja Rumah Tangga (PRT) adalah kelompok marginalyang paling rentan terhadap kelalaian yang dilakukanoleh majikan. Hal ini terbukti dengan tidak adanyakejelasan hukum atau perlindungan bagi status mereka.Seharusnya jaminan konstitusional sebagai bentukkepedulian negara untuk memberikan perlindunganekonomi, sosial serta keadilan dan kesejahteraan bagipekerja rumah tangga sudah ada sejak kemerdekaanIndonesia. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menunjukkanbetapa pentingnya regulasi perlindungan pekerjarumah tangga. Temuan dari artikel ini adalah bahwaada berbagai alasan baik normatif, hukum dan bahkanpraktis yang menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukumbagi pekerja rumah tangga harus diatur dalam undangundangkhusus dan harus direalisasikan. Pertama,keberadaan undang-undang tentang pekerja rumah tangga sebagai bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja rumah tangga sebagai titik tolak bagi pemerintah untuksecara bertahap merubah status hukum Pekerja RumahTangga (sebagai pekerja non formal) menjadi pekerja formal. Pergeseran ini penting karena itu berdampakpositif pada nilai ekonomi mereka.kata kunci: Pekerja Rumah Tangga, PerlindunganHukum, Peraturan Household Workers (PRT) are marginal groups whichare the most vulnerable to the abuse of the employer.This proved by the absence of legal clarity or protectionfor their work. Constitutional Guarantees  as a formof  state contracts in order to provide Economical andSocial protection as well as justice and welfare for humanincluding domestic workers should be a fundamentalregulation since Indonesian independence. This articleaimed to show how important is the regulation in terms ofhousehold worker protection. The finding of this article isthat the existence of normative , legal and even practicalreasons to strengthen the argument that the protection ofthe law for domestic workers should be regulated in thelegislation specifically in  Drafts or Bill on Protection of Household Workers. There are many reasons strengthenthe argument that the protection of the law againstHousehold Workers (PRT) should be realized. First, theexistence of legislation on domestic workers as a form oflegal protection for domestic workers as a strating pointfor the government to gradually bring the HouseholdWorkers (as non formal workers) into formal workers.This shift is important because of it’s positive impact on their economic value.keywords: household workers, legal protection, legislation
Overview of the Judge's Forgiveness Concept Its Relation to The Legal Interests of Criminal Victims (RKUHP Concept Study) Yusuf, Muhammad Rifai; Wati, Briliyan Erna; Harun, Muhammad; Nurhayati, Tri
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2021.3.1.8724

Abstract

Judge forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon) is a new concept in the Draft Criminal Code (RKUHP) which authorizes judges not to impose a crime even though the defendant is proven guilty with several provisions as a condition of forgiveness. The position of the victim becomes important to discuss regarding the existence of this concept because the defendant who should be responsible for his actions can be released from the charge, on the other hand, the victim as the object of the crime, in general, is the party who has suffered losses for his legal interests. So, this concept ideally accommodates the interests of the victim adequately as a condition for forgiveness. The urgency of the victim's position in the concept was rechterlijk pardon further elaborated through a study entitled "An Overview of the Concept of Judge (Forgiveness Rechterlijk Pardon) concerning the Legal Interests of Criminal Victims (Concept Study of the 2019 RKUHP)". The focus of this research problem is to find out the history and concept of judge forgiveness in the RKUHP and to further review the concept of judge forgiveness about the legal interests of victims of criminal acts. This research is juridical-normative research using a historical approach, a comparative approach, and a conceptual approach. Sources of data used are data secondary consisting of legal materials (primary, secondary, tertiary). The method of collecting data is through literature or document studies and presented in a descriptive-analytical manner. The results showed that the formulation of rechterlijk pardon since the first RKUHP (1993) was motivated by the desire to include the goals and guidelines of punishment as a general principle of the Indonesian criminal system. While the concept is based on the "idea of balance" from the main elements of public interest and individual interests (actor-victim), actions and inner attitudes, certainty, flexibility, and justice. The current formulation does not represent this idea because the formulation is incomplete and clear regarding the terms of forgiveness so that from the victim's side there is uncertainty about the protection of his legal interests.Pemaafan hakim (rechterlijk pardon) merupakan konsep baru dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (RKUHP) yang memberi kewenangan kepada hakim untuk tidak mengenakan pidana meskipun terdakwa terbukti bersalah dengan beberapa ketentuan sebagai syarat pemaafan. Posisi korban menjadi penting didiskusikan terkait keberadaan konsepsi, sebab terdakwa yang seharusnya mempertanggungjawabkan perbuatannya dapat dibebaskan dari tuntutan itu, di sisi lain korban sebagai objek kejahatan secara umum adalah pihak yang mengalami kerugian atas kepentingan hukumnya. Maka konsep ini idealnya mengakomodir kepentingan korban secara memadai sebagai syarat adanya pemaafan. Urgensitas kedudukan korban tersebut dalam konsep rechterlijk pardon dielaborasi lebih lanjut melalui penelitian dengan judul “Tinjauan Terhadap Konsep Pemaafan Hakim (Rechterlijk Pardon) Kaitannya dengan Kepentingan Hukum Korban Tindak Pidana (Studi Konsep RKUHP 2019)”. Fokus permasalahan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui sejarah dan konsep pemaafan hakim dalam RKUHP serta meninjau lebih jauh konsep pemaafan hakim kaitannya dengan kepentingan hukum korban tindak pidana. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan historis, pendekatan perbandingan, serta pendekatan konseptual. Sumber data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan-bahan hukum (primer, sekunder, tersier). Metode pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan atau dokumen dan disajikan secara deskriptif-analitis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perumusan rechterlijk pardon sejak RKUHP pertama (1993) dilatarbelakangi oleh kehendak memasukkan tujuan dan pedoman pemidanaan sebagai prinsip umum sistem pemidanaan Indonesia. Sedangkan konsepsinya didasarkan pada“ ide keseimbangan” dari unsur pokok kepentingan umum dan kepentingan perorangan (pelaku-korban), perbuatan dan sikap batin, kepastian, fleksibilitas dan keadilan. Rumusan saat ini belum merepresentasikan ide tersebut disebabkan formulasi yang tidak lengkap dan jelas perihal syarat-syarat pemberian maaf sehingga dari sisi korban terdapat ketidakpastian perlindungan atas kepentingan hukumnya.
DIMENSI-DIMENSI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEKERJA RUMAH TANGGA DI ERA INDUSTRIALISAI Briliyan Erna Wati
PALASTREN Jurnal Studi Gender Vol 7, No 1 (2014): PALASTREN
Publisher : STAIN Kudus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/palastren.v7i1.1002

Abstract

Pekerja Rumah Tangga (PRT) adalah kelompok marginalyang paling rentan terhadap kelalaian yang dilakukanoleh majikan. Hal ini terbukti dengan tidak adanyakejelasan hukum atau perlindungan bagi status mereka.Seharusnya jaminan konstitusional sebagai bentukkepedulian negara untuk memberikan perlindunganekonomi, sosial serta keadilan dan kesejahteraan bagipekerja rumah tangga sudah ada sejak kemerdekaanIndonesia. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menunjukkanbetapa pentingnya regulasi perlindungan pekerjarumah tangga. Temuan dari artikel ini adalah bahwaada berbagai alasan baik normatif, hukum dan bahkanpraktis yang menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukumbagi pekerja rumah tangga harus diatur dalam undangundangkhusus dan harus direalisasikan. Pertama,keberadaan undang-undang tentang pekerja rumah tangga sebagai bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja rumah tangga sebagai titik tolak bagi pemerintah untuksecara bertahap merubah status hukum Pekerja RumahTangga (sebagai pekerja non formal) menjadi pekerja formal. Pergeseran ini penting karena itu berdampakpositif pada nilai ekonomi mereka.kata kunci: Pekerja Rumah Tangga, PerlindunganHukum, Peraturan Household Workers (PRT) are marginal groups whichare the most vulnerable to the abuse of the employer.This proved by the absence of legal clarity or protectionfor their work. Constitutional Guarantees  as a formof  state contracts in order to provide Economical andSocial protection as well as justice and welfare for humanincluding domestic workers should be a fundamentalregulation since Indonesian independence. This articleaimed to show how important is the regulation in terms ofhousehold worker protection. The finding of this article isthat the existence of normative , legal and even practicalreasons to strengthen the argument that the protection ofthe law for domestic workers should be regulated in thelegislation specifically in  Drafts or Bill on Protection of Household Workers. There are many reasons strengthenthe argument that the protection of the law againstHousehold Workers (PRT) should be realized. First, theexistence of legislation on domestic workers as a form oflegal protection for domestic workers as a strating pointfor the government to gradually bring the HouseholdWorkers (as non formal workers) into formal workers.This shift is important because of it’s positive impact on their economic value.keywords: household workers, legal protection, legislation
Penegakan Hukum Pidana Balap Liar Oleh Pihak Kepolisian Terhadap Terciptanya Ketertiban Umum Sarifah, Nurhidah; Wati, Briliyan Erna; Afifah, Hasna
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i1.11401

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the criminal law enforcement of illegal racing by Semarang Police Satlantas in Jalan Diponegoro Ungaran, its causal factors, and obstacles to public order. This research is important because it is material for a law enforcement approach that focuses on public order and evaluation of the effectiveness of the role of the Police so that illegal racing can be overcome. This research uses qualitative research methods with a juridical sociological approach with the findings that cases of illegal racing in three years, namely 2022-2024, have only decreased slightly with the highest case in 2022 totaling 282 cases. This is motivated by law enforcement constraints, especially the lack of police personnel and the habit of illegal racing which is a contributing factor to the existence of illegal racing. various police efforts have been made, but the unresolved cases of illegal racing cause instability in law enforcement and have a negative impact on society. This research concludes that better law enforcement is needed by improving the quality of police performance, and community participation with a humanistic action approach to discuss together the dangers and violations of illegal racing and the application of CCTV to find out illegal racing violations. A comprehensive approach by combining legal, educational, and socio-cultural paradigms as an innovation in overcoming illegal racing and creating public order. This research is important and different from previous studies because it discusses the use of a more integrated approach from the police, which involves technology and community cooperation and provides practical solutions to overcome the problem of illegal racing. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis penegakan hukum pidana balap liar oleh Kepolisian Satlantas Polres Semarang di Jalan Diponegoro Ungaran, faktor penyebab dan kendalanya terhadap ketertiban umum.  Penelitian ini menjadi penting karena menjadi bahan untuk pendekatan penegakan hukum yang berfokus pada ketertiban umum dan evaluasi efektivitas peran kepolisian sehingga balap liar dapat diatasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis sosiologis dengan hasil temuan bahwa kasus balap liar dalam tiga tahun yaitu 2022-2024 hanya mengalami penurunan sedikit dengan kasus tertinggi pada tahun 2022 berjumlah 282 kasus. Hal tersebut dilatarbelakangi karena kendala penegakan hukum terutama kurangnya personil kepolisian dan kebiasaan balap liar yang menjadi faktor penyebab adanya balap liar. berbagai upaya polisi sudah dilakukan, tetapi kasus balap liar yang belum teratasi menimbulkan ketidakstabilan penegakan hukum dan berdampak negatif bagi masyarakat. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan, diperlukan penegakan hukum yang lebih baik dengan meningkatkan kualitas kinerja kepolisian, keikutsertaan masyarakat dengan pendekatan tindakan humanitis untuk berdiskusi bersama bahaya dan pelanggaran balap liar serta penerapan CCTV  untuk mengetahui pelanggaran balap liar. Pendekatan secara komprehensif dengan memadukan paradigma hukum, pendidikan, dan sosial-budaya sebagai inovasi dalam mengatasi balapan liar dan terciptanya ketertiban umum. Penelitian ini menjadi penting dan berbeda dari penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya karena membahas penggunaan pendekatan dari kepolisian yang lebih terintegrasi, yang melibatkan teknologi dan kerjasama masyarakat, serta memberikan solusi praktis untuk mengatasi masalah balap liar.  
Inheritance Law Politics: The Implementation in Muslim-Nonmuslim Families in Southern Thailand Lathifah, Anthin; Briliyan Erna Wati; Mustakama Waeduereh; Nipatimoh Phudaro
El-Mashlahah Vol 15 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/el-mashlahah.v15i1.9970

Abstract

The applicable law in a country is determined by the politics, including Muslim-non-Muslim inheritance law applicable in the Southern Thailand region, which is a Muslim-majority region in a Buddhist-majority country. The article aimed to describe the influence of politics in determining the implementation of Muslim-non-Muslim inheritance law in Thailand. The article was the result of socio-legal research with a legal political approach. Primary data sources were obtained from interviews with civil courts, Ulama at the Islamic Religious Council, parties involved in legal assistance in court, and Muslim-non-Muslim families who carry out inheritance law division. Meanwhile, secondary data were obtained from relevant documents. The study showed that the politics in Thailand have implications for the flexibility of inheritance law in Muslim-Non-Muslim families, which consists of three inheritance distribution patterns. First, Optional of the family is free to determine the law used in the inheritance division. This pattern is practiced by the majority pattern implemented in Thailand. Second, compromise, namely the Court and the Islamic Religious Council compromise to determine Muslim-non-Muslim inheritance law. And, Contestation, Islamic law contests with Buddhist law. The pattern of inheritance distribution between Muslim and non-Muslim families in Thailand shows flexibility of the state in implementing civil inheritance law. Also, the position of Islamic family law, especially inheritance law, is considered quite strong.
Co-Authors Anthin Lathifah, Anthin Hasna Afifah, Hasna Muhammad Harun Mustakama Waeduereh Nipatimoh Phudaro Sarifah, Nurhidah Tri Nurhayati Yusuf, Muhammad Rifai