Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

The Reason South Korea Approved The Placement of A High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Terminal System in 2016 Anouphone Inthaly; Agung Risdhianto; Aris Sarjito
Journal of Education on Social Science (JESS) Vol 6 No 1 (2022): Government's Strategy in Conserving Natural Resource
Publisher : Faculty of Social Science, Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/jess.v6i1.397

Abstract

The United States counts South Korea as one of its most significant allies. Relations between the two countries began when the US and South Korea became military allies in the early 1950s, with the US promising to assist South Korea in defending itself against any North Korean assault. Since 2014, the US has attempted to include South Korea in the East Asia region's anti-missile defense system, but it has always been refused. There are several causes for this, including disagreements among South Koreans, relations with China, and complaints from neighboring countries such as China, North Korea, and Russia. South Korea, on the other hand, stated on July 8, 2016, that the United States would be placed in a special category. However, on July 8, 2016, South Korea stated that the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) anti-missile defense system from the United States would be stationed in the country. This oddity piqued the writer's interest, prompting him to investigate the reasons behind South Korea's approval of THAAD placement in 2016. This research is expected to have an impact on decision-makers in choosing a defense strategy that reduces the risk of security dilemmas as has happened in South Korea.
Impact of Technology, Military, and Socio-Economic Welfare on Conflict in Indonesia and Japan Alwan Mubarok; Hikmat Zakky Almubaroq; Surachman Surjaatmadja; Agung Risdhianto
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 3 No 2 (2023): IJHESS OCTOBER 2023
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v3i2.615

Abstract

Conflicts are driven by various factors, but over time, conflicts have evolved in nature and complexity. In addition to traditional factors, the emergence of technology has played a significant role in shaping conflicts. Technological advancements also have been a driving force in shaping societies and economies, and impacting various sectors and aspects of life. Our research uses Structural Equation Model (SEM) analysis. We will analyze the direct and indirect impacts of digital connectivity, technology trade, military expenditure and personnel, and socio-economic welfare on conflicts and tensions in Indonesia and Japan. The findings of our study suggest that technology variables such as digital connectivity and technology trade have a positive effect on socio-economic welfare in Indonesia with coefficients 0.311 and 0.457. A similar thing also happened in Japan with coefficients 1.312 and 0.310. However, technology trade can increase conflicts and tensions in Indonesia with coefficients 0.796, and digital connectivity can increase conflicts and tensions in Japan with coefficients 0.761. Additionally, socio-economic welfare significantly reduces conflict in Japan.
Biosecurity Challenges: How Defense Strategies Against Tuberculosis In Asean Countries Akhmad Sultoni Yahya; Anak Agung Banyu Perwita; Agung Risdhianto; Hikmat Zakky Al Mubaroq
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 3 No 4 (2024): IJHESS FEBRUARY 2024
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v3i4.759

Abstract

This comprehensive research provides a thorough analysis of tuberculosis (TB) incidence trends and sanitation challenges within the ASEAN region spanning from 2005 to 2021. It underscores the critical need for robust defense strategies against TB, particularly in light of setbacks exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The research, conducted in Jakarta, Indonesia, from June to July 2023, delved into biosecurity challenges of tuberculosis in ASEAN countries, using a quantitative approach and cross-sectional design. Data from 2005 to 2021, sourced from the ASEAN database, underwent descriptive statistics and trend analysis to explore TB incidence rates, ensuring a comprehensive investigation scope. The study places emphasis on the imperative of implementing comprehensive measures encompassing prevention, screening, swift diagnosis, utilization of advanced treatment regimens, and ensuring robust patient support systems. Moreover, it highlights the pivotal role of addressing sanitation challenges, as substandard conditions significantly heighten the risks of TB transmission. The study's scope encompasses an array of critical subjects, with a central focus on TB incidence rates, as well as the crucial aspects of access to improved sanitation facilities and sanitation services. The conclusion is the ASEAN region, especially the Philippines, faces a notable tuberculosis burden, coupled with uneven access to sanitation. Effective interventions and collaboration are vital for improving public health and sanitation standards in ASEAN countries.
Integrating AI in Military Decision-Making: A Review of Opportunities, Risks, and Governance M. Thoriq Fadlullah; Agung Risdhianto; Heru Dewanto
Brilliance: Research of Artificial Intelligence Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Brilliance: Research of Artificial Intelligence, Article Research November 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Cita Cendekiawan Al Khwarizmi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47709/brilliance.v5i2.6925

Abstract

Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into military operations creates a paradigm shift, introducing a profound tension between operational opportunities and severe risks to strategic stability. This paper conducts a systematic literature review to investigate this challenge, focusing on the transformation of Military Decision-Making. The analysis confirms that while AI offers significant capabilities in intelligence and logistics, it also introduces a triad of technical, strategic, and human-centric risks. These risks fuel a global arms race and create a crisis of accountability, particularly with the development of Autonomous Weapons. The central problem identified is a critical "governance gap," where the rapid, geopolitically-driven adoption of military AI has dangerously outpaced the development of effective oversight. This study addresses this gap by synthesising fragmented literature into an integrated, problem-solving framework. It argues that robust Ethical Governance is necessary to respond to these complex challenges. The operationalisation of Meaningful Human Control (MHC) is the cornerstone for closing the "responsibility gap" and ensuring that human agents remain accountable for using force. The paper concludes that a prioritised, multi-layered governance strategy—from short-term national testing standards to a long-term international autonomy treaty is essential. Pursuing AI-driven military advantage without such reforms will lead to unacceptable strategic instability and ethical compromise, undermining the security it intends to enhance.