Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pelatihan Ketrampilan Jumputan Di Tamanharjo, Singosari Kabupaten Malang Diah Wahyulina; Muhammad Wahid Cahyana; Rumadi Rumadi
Jurnal ABM Mengabdi Vol 9 No 01 (2022): Juni
Publisher : STIE Malangkucecwara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31966/jam.v9i01.1034

Abstract

The Covid 19 pandemic that has hit Indonesia since the beginning of 2020 has not only affected people's freedom to gather, but also affected the people's economic life. Many community members lost their jobs so that the community's economic level declined, this also happened in Tamanharjo Village, Singosari, Malang Regency. The problems faced by the community in Tamanharjo Village, Singosari, Malang Regency as partners of this service program are the desire to develop the creativity of mothers in making jumputans, but they are not supported by capital and there is no adequate knowledge and expertise about making jumputans. Partners need knowledge, techniques and skills to make jumputans based on cloth, which will be very helpful in efforts to produce quality jumputan fabric products, so that they will improve the welfare of the local community. To be able to realize the things mentioned above, assistance and training are needed in making jumputans from cloth. The method that will be used in its implementation is by conducting training on the basics of making jumputan fabrics, introducing equipment and also the practice of making jumputans. The implementation of the jumputan skill making program was carried out well with the results in accordance with the output target of this service, namely partners were able to make and produce jumputan batik fabrics with various patterns and colors, so this can be used as capital to develop jumputan businesses. Keywords: Training, Skills, Cloth, Jumputan, Handmade
Indigenous Sanctions vs. Universal Human Rights: Deciphering the Epistemic Clash in the Codification of Customary Penal Systems Muhammad Wahid Cahyana; Ismawati Ismawati; Rashid Rahman
Islamic Studies in the World Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/isw.v3i3.3978

Abstract

Background. Legal pluralism has intensified global debates concerning the relationship between indigenous customary justice systems and universal human rights norms. Efforts to codify customary penal systems increasingly generate tensions regarding cultural autonomy, legal legitimacy, and human dignity. Indigenous sanctions are often grounded in communitarian conceptions of justice that emphasize restoration, reconciliation, and collective responsibility, whereas international human rights frameworks prioritize individual rights, procedural fairness, and equality before the law. Purpose. This study aims to examine the epistemic foundations underlying these tensions and explore how competing legal knowledge systems influence the codification of customary penal systems. Method. A qualitative socio-legal research design was employed through document analysis, comparative case examination, thematic coding, and interpretive analysis of legal texts, policy documents, judicial decisions, and scholarly literature concerning customary law and human rights. Results. Findings reveal that conflicts emerging during codification processes are primarily epistemological rather than purely legal in nature. Differences in conceptions of justice, authority, accountability, and social order significantly shape perceptions of legitimacy among indigenous communities, state institutions, and human rights actors. Participatory legal reforms incorporating indigenous perspectives were found to reduce normative tensions and improve acceptance of codified legal frameworks. Conclusion. The study concludes that sustainable legal integration requires recognition of epistemic diversity alongside commitments to fundamental human rights protections. Constructive dialogue between indigenous legal traditions and universal human rights frameworks offers a pathway toward more inclusive and culturally responsive legal governance in pluralistic societies.