Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Multidisiplin Dehasen (MUDE)
Mukhlis Al Huda
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum IBLAM
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Politik Hukum Yudisial dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja) Yodi Achmad Kurniawan; Mukhlis Al Huda
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Desember 2022
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (273.851 KB) | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v6i2.4013

Abstract

AbstrakBagaimana Politik Hukum Yudisial dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 tentang Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja, yang dalam Amar Putusannya menetapkan bahwa Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020 (Selanjutnya disebut UU Cipta Kerja) dalam Pokok Permohonan menyatakan pembentukan Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat secara bersyarat sepanjang tidak dimaknai “tidak dilakukan perbaikan dalam waktu 2 (dua) tahun sejak putusan ini diucapkan (Inkonstitutional bersyarat). Hasil putusan MK tersebut telah banyak menuai pro-kontra dimasyarakat terlebih setelah putusan MK tersebut beberapa pengajuan Uji formil maupun materil yang diajukan kepada MK namun hampir semua perkara tersebut diputus tidak dapat diterima dengan alasan telah kehilangan objek, karena Putusan MK Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 telah menetapkan Undang-Undang No. 11 tahun 2020 inkonstitusional bersyarat.Kata Kunci: Politik Hukum Yudisial, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, Pembangunan Hukum Nasional
Sanksi Hukum Bagi Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 25/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/Pn Bks) Restu Fauzi; Mukhlis Al Huda; Muhammad Rizal Rustam
Jurnal Multidisiplin Dehasen (MUDE) Vol 2 No 3 (2023): Juli
Publisher : Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/mude.v2i3.4724

Abstract

Children are part of the younger generation as one of the human resources that hasa strategic role and has special characteristics and traits. The Law on Juvenile Courts is considered no longer appropriate to protect children's rights before the law. The writing of this study aims to determine the application of legal sanctions for children as perpetrators of the crime of theft with violence and analyze the Judge's Decision for Children as Perpetrators of Violent Theft (Case Study of Decision Number: 25/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN Bks). The method used in this research uses the Normative Research Method, namely research whose object of study includes norms or basic rules, legal principles, laws and regulations, comparative law, doctrine, and jurisprudence. The type of data used is secondary data, namely data obtained from literature (library research). This research is descriptive Analytical. In this case the defendant was 17 years old, Child in Conflict with the Law ANDIKA PRATAMA Alias DIKA Bin M. SURON, had committed. Theft with violence against persons as regulated and punishable in the indictment by Noting, Article 365 paragraph (2) 1st and 2nd of the Criminal Code and Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children Against the Law and Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law and other relevant laws and regulations violating Article 365 paragraph (2) 1st and 2nd of the Criminal Code.
Co-Authors Harry Syahputra I Gusti Agung Ngurah Muhammad Rizal Rustam Padimun Lumban Tobing Restu Fauzi Yodi Achmad Kurniawan