Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Role Of The Police In Overcoming Illegal Mining Of Natural Stones That Impact On Natural Damage And Community Settlement Roy Moonti; Yusrianto Kadir; Marten Bunga; Yoslan K. Koni; Ramdhan Kasim
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 1 No 6 (2022): IJHESS-JUNE 2022
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v1i6.186

Abstract

The purpose of this study is how the role of the police in overcoming the illegal mining of natural stone which has an impact on natural damage and community settlements and what factors hinder the police in overcoming the illegal mining of natural stone which has an impact on the natural damage of community settlements. The research method used is the type of research used is empirical normative legal research. Normative law research uses normative legal case studies in the form of legal products, while empirical legal research uses empirical legal case studies in the form of community behavior. The role of the police in overcoming the illegal mining of natural stone that has an impact on natural damage and community settlements in Gorontalo Regency is by conducting outreach to the daenaa village community, then carrying out prevention stages, and finally taking action step by step is not heeded and what factors The factors that hinder the police in overcoming the illegal mining of natural stone that has an impact on natural damage to the settlements of the people of Gorontalo Regency are economic factors, the perpetrators want to avoid the obligations that have been determined, the difficulty factor in obtaining an IUP (Mining Business Permit), the factor of the lack of socialization regarding laws and regulations. invitation and the factor of weak law enforcement.
Transition Of Authority Judicial Institutions Simultaneous National Elections 2024 Salahudin Pakaya; Roy Moonti; Yusrianto Kadir; Taufik Firmanto
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 3 No 2 (2023): IJHESS OCTOBER 2023
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v3i2.496

Abstract

The decision of the Constitutional Court No. 97/PUU-XI/2013 resulted in changes in the function and authority of the judicial institution that adjudicates Pilkada. The Constitutional Court's decision then gave birth to Article 157 of Law No. 10 of 2016 Amending Law No. 8 of 2015 (Pilkada Law) which contains provisions for the establishment of a special election judicial body that will hear disputes over the results of simultaneous national elections in 2024. However, the establishment of a special election judicial body mandated by the Pilkada Law still faces juridical obstacles if it is linked to Law 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, and laws governing judicial bodies under the auspices of the Supreme Court, especially the general and state administrative courts. Another juridical problem is the Constitutional Court Decision Number 85/PUU-XX/2022 which states that the phrase "until a special judicial body is established" in Article 157 paragraph (3) of the Pilkada Law does not have binding legal force. So that the Constitutional Court's decision can be interpreted as a sign of defining the Constitutional Court as a permanent judicial institution to hear disputes over Pilkada results. This research uses normative research methods as a characteristic of legal research, using statute law approaches, expert opinions. The purpose of this research is to search and find the right norms and have legal arguments in determining the right judicial institution authorized to hear disputes over the results of the 2024 simultaneous regional elections.