Rahmat Yulianto
Mahasiswa Jurusan Budidaya Perairan Fakultas pertanian Unila

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

STUDI ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA KLATEN NOMOR 1708/PDT.G/2023/PA.KLT TENTANG CERAI KARENA SYIQOQ Yulianto, Rahmat; Baehaqi, B; Sulistyowati, S
AL HUKMU: Journal of Islamic Law and Economics Vol. 04, No. 1 Maret 2025
Publisher : Institut Islam Mamba'ul 'Ulum Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54090/hukmu.618

Abstract

The main problem for those seeking justice through the courts is related to the decision of the panel of judges, not a few of them seek justice but instead get injustice or those who are innocent but when processed in court are the ones who are guilty, this is closely related to the process, legal considerations and conformity with religious norms, this research aims to determine the legal considerations and analysis of Islamic family law regarding this decision. This research uses qualitative research methods. The data collection technique uses field research techniques, namely documentation, direct interviews with judges at the Klaten religious court in order to obtain complete data sources and observations. Data analysis uses qualitative analysis, while testing the validity of the data is carried out through credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability tests. In this research the author describes the court decision regarding Syiqoq divorce. The research and analysis results show that the legal basis used by the panel of judges in deciding cases is article 39 (2) of Law No. 1. As well as following the recommendations of Islamic law, namely Al-Qur'an surah An-Nisa' verse 35 and Al-Baqoroh verse 231, advice to judges to always be fair and adhere to applicable law.
Konsep Filsafat Ilmu dalam Perspektif Islam dan Barat Sarwanto, Sarwanto; Pramono, Agus; Z, M. Badruddin; Yulianto, Rahmat
TSAQOFAH Vol 6 No 1 (2026): JANUARI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i1.8109

Abstract

Philosophical studies of science in Western and Islamic traditions have been widely discussed; however, research that specifically analyzes the fundamental differences in the sources, methods, and aims of knowledge between these two civilizations remains limited. This study aims to identify the fundamental differences in the ontological foundations (the nature of the existence of knowledge), epistemological foundations (sources and means of acquiring knowledge), and axiological foundations (values and purposes of knowledge) within the framework of Western and Islamic philosophy of science. The study employs a comparative analytical method on key concepts in the philosophy of science by examining the relationships between sources of knowledge, the operation of reason and empirical experience, and the value orientations that underlie the aims of scientific development in each tradition. The findings indicate that the Western perspective tends to be dominated by secularism, characterized by the separation of knowledge from religious values, an emphasis on reason and the senses as the primary sources of knowledge, and an orientation of scientific aims toward material progress and the fulfillment of worldly needs. Conversely, in the Islamic perspective, the philosophy of science is grounded in the principle of tauhid, which integrates knowledge with religious teachings; the sources of knowledge encompass not only reason and the senses but also Al-Qur'an and Hadis as the highest sources of truth and guides for human thought, with a more holistic orientation aimed at understanding the greatness of Allah SWT, attaining well-being in this world and the hereafter, and forming morally virtuous human beings. In conclusion, these differences in ontological, epistemological, and axiological frameworks demonstrate that although both traditions produce knowledge, their philosophical foundations and ultimate goals are markedly distinct, thereby providing a more comprehensive understanding of the position and function of knowledge in Western and Islamic civilizations.