Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.259
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Rechtsidee Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis International Journal of Social Service and Research Journal of Law and Social Politics
Hendrik Salmon
Universitas Pattimura
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
MODEL PENGAWASAN DAN TATA HUBUNGAN KEWENANGAN DALAM UPAYA PENCEGAHAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DANA DESA Sherlock Halmes Lekipiouw; Hendrik Salmon; Natanel Lainsamputty
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 6, No 1 (2022): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v6i1.4405

Abstract

This research was conducted to review and analyze the technical aspects of the law, especially in the approach of constitutional law and administrative law related to governance and accountability and responsibility in managing village funds and how efforts are made in the framework of prevention, especially the supervision aspect of minimizing the existence of village funds. Misuse and corruption in the use of village funds by village officials. This study uses a socio-legal method (doctrinal analysis of the law) using 3 (three) approaches, namely first, the conditional approach, which refers to the village fund management policy strategy, mainly related to the high cases of corruption in village funds; (2) statute approach, which refers to the system to legislation relating to the management of village funds; and (3) legal policy, which relates to government policies in terms of monitoring and preventing corruption in the direction of village funds. All stages in this research are carried out using a community service research scheme that has been determined by the research institution to be carried out by the Research Team in the field of constitutional law studies and administrative law. The focus of the research will be directed at structuring the relationship of authority between law enforcement agencies and the government, in this case, the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP), in conducting supervision and law enforcement on the management of village funds. This is intended to obtain a model and policy framework for managing village funds free from criminal acts of corruption to realize the principles of transparency and accountability by the applicable laws and regulations.
PENERAPAN UANG PAKSA (DWANGSOM) DALAM EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN TATAUSAHA NEGARA TERHADAP KETIDAKPATUHAN PEJABAT TUN Dezonda Pattipawae; Hendrik Salmon
Community Development Journal : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022): Volume 3 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/cdj.v3i3.7495

Abstract

Tindakan pemerintah pada dasarnya harus mengaju pada peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku dan juga berdasar pada kewenangan yang dimiliki, jika tidak maka tindakan tersebut dapat digugat pada pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara, terhadap putusan pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara banyak kejadi Pejabat tidak patuh, terdap ketidakpatuhan tersebut maka ada upaya yang disebut dwangsom/uang paksa maupun sanksi admistratif. Adapun metode yang dipakai dalam pengabdian ini adalah metode penyuluhan.
Electricity Theft as an Economic Crime: Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia Martha Damita Palilu; Hendrik Salmon; Hadibah Wadjo
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v6i6.1436

Abstract

This study examines electricity theft as an economic crime within the Indonesian legal framework, focusing on its legal implications, enforcement challenges, and impact on state financial interests. The background of this research is rooted in the increasing occurrence of electricity theft, which not only causes financial losses to PT PLN (Persero) but may also contribute to broader state financial losses due to its status as a state-owned enterprise managing public assets. The objective of this study is to analyze the criminal liability of electricity theft offenders and to evaluate the effectiveness of legal enforcement under Law Number 30 of 2009 concerning Electricity. The method used is normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively to examine relevant legal norms, doctrines, and judicial interpretations. The results show that electricity theft is explicitly regulated as a criminal offense and should be treated as an economic crime affecting the public interest. However, enforcement practices in Indonesia tend to rely more on administrative sanctions through the Electricity Usage Control Program (P2TL), which reduces the deterrent effect of criminal law. The study concludes that stronger criminal enforcement, clearer legal interpretation of state financial loss, and the integration of modern monitoring technologies are necessary to improve electricity theft prevention and strengthen energy governance in Indonesia.
Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 123/PUU-VII/2009 terhadap Administrasi Kependudukan di Kabupaten Maluku Tengah dan Kabupaten Seram Bagian Barat Stenly Ilela; Hendrik Salmon; Julista Mustamu
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 6 (2026): Tema Hukum Keluarga
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i6.3350

Abstract

This research examines the disharmony between the body and its attachments in Law no. 40 of 2003 and its emphasis on population administration after Constitutional Court Decision no. 123/PUU-VII/2009. The method used is normative juridical with analysis of regulations and court decisions. The research results show that conflicting norms lead to open laws, dualism of authority and overlapping population data. The implementation of the Constitutional Court's decision has not been optimal because it has not been followed up through a judicial review. This condition has an impact on public services and certainty of people's domicile, so that regulatory harmonization is needed to guarantee legal security and the effectiveness of population administration.
Kewenangan Intelijen Kejaksaan dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia: Analisis Yuridis terhadap Batas Kewenangan dan Kepastian Hukum Dhotun Kendaru Rahmando; Sherlock H. Lekipiouw; Hendrik Salmon
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 8 (2026): Tema Hukum Pemerintahan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i8.3591

Abstract

This study analyzes the authority of prosecutorial intelligence within the Indonesian constitutional system following Law Number 11 of 2021. The main issue lies in normative ambiguity and overlapping authority with other institutions, affecting legal certainty. The findings show that prosecutorial intelligence authority is a legally attributed power but lacks clear limitations in scope, procedures, and oversight. This condition potentially leads to conflicts of authority and abuse of power. Therefore, harmonization of laws and strengthening of oversight mechanisms are necessary to ensure legal certainty and the effectiveness of the criminal justice system.
Ultra Vires Actions of Regional Heads in Official Replacement Erwin Tanaya; Hendrik Salmon; Julista Mustamu
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i4.277

Abstract

Background: The replacement of officials by regional heads must comply with the principle of legality, the merit system, and statutory provisions. However, replacements conducted without authority, beyond authorized powers, or contrary to legal provisions (ultra vires) reveal gaps between administrative law and governance practices, threatening legal certainty and the rights of state civil apparatus personnel. Objective: This study examines the effectiveness of government supervision over ultra vires actions by regional heads in replacing officials and their legal consequences from a state administrative law perspective. Methods: This normative legal research employs statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials were collected through a literature review and analyzed qualitatively using a prescriptive approach. Results: Supervisory mechanisms remain ineffective because preventive supervision applies only under specific conditions. Outside these conditions, supervision predominantly relies on repressive mechanisms through the State Administrative Court. Ultra vires actions produce administrative decisions with defects of authority (bevoegdheidsgebrek), affecting their validity, the employment status of state civil apparatus personnel, and regional heads’ legal accountability. These findings highlight the need for stronger safeguards against unlawful replacements. Conclusion: Strengthening preventive supervision and clarifying regulations on the classification and legal consequences of administrative decisions that are void ab initio are necessary to ensure legal certainty, safeguard personnel rights, protect the merit system, and promote good governance.
Legal Force of Administrative Remedies in the Settlement of State Administrative Disputes: Kekuatan Hukum Tindakan Administratif dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi Negara Putri Julian Masbait; Hendrik Salmon; Dezonda R. Pattipawae
Rechtsidee Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1082

Abstract

General Background: Indonesia, as a constitutional state, mandates that administrative actions adhere to legal norms, where administrative dispute resolution mechanisms play a vital role in ensuring justice and accountability in governance. Specific Background: The existence of administrative remedies—comprising objections and administrative appeals—serves as a non-judicial mechanism designed to resolve conflicts internally before proceeding to the State Administrative Court (PTUN). However, inconsistencies between Law No. 5/1986, Law No. 30/2014, and Supreme Court Regulation No. 6/2018 have created uncertainty regarding the obligatory nature of these remedies. Knowledge Gap: Limited research has comprehensively analyzed the binding legal force of administrative remedies and their implications for legal certainty and access to justice. Aims: This study aims to analyze the legal force and implications of administrative remedies in resolving state administrative disputes. Results: Findings show that administrative objections generally lack binding legal force and function more as recommendations, while administrative appeals possess stronger but under-implemented authority. Novelty: The research highlights disharmony among the relevant legal frameworks and its effect on the principle of exhaustion of administrative remedies. Implications: Strengthening the effectiveness and accountability of administrative remedies is crucial to enhance access to justice and ensure legal certainty within Indonesia’s administrative law system. Highlights: Examines the inconsistency between laws regulating administrative remedies. Identifies the weak binding power of objections and limited efficacy of appeals. Highlights the need for stronger accountability to ensure access to justice. Keywords: Legal Force, Administrative Remedies, State Administrative Disputes, Legal Certainty, Access to Justice
Co-Authors Dezonda Pattipawae Dezonda R. Pattipawae Dhotun Kendaru Rahmando Erwin Tanaya Hadibah Wadjo Julista Mustamu Martha Damita Palilu Natanel Lainsamputty Putri Julian Masbait Sherlock H. Lekipiouw Sherlock Halmes Lekipiouw Stenly Ilela