Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Rayah Al Islam : Jurnal Ilmu Islam IQTISHOD: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah
Jajat Sudrajat
STIBA Ar Raayah Sukabumi
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
الكلمات الساساكية ذات أصل عربي في معجم اللغة الساسكية الإندونيسية Salman Abu Al-Khair; Jajat Sudrajat
Rayah Al-Islam Vol 2 No 02 (2018): Rayah Al-Islam Oktober 2018
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Bahasa Arab Ar Raayah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1393.177 KB) | DOI: 10.37274/rais.v2i02.42

Abstract

The study used an analytical descriptive method that described the right subject, with this method the researcher was able to describe the vocabulary of the Sasak language from Arabic (from the letter S to Z) in the Sasak - Indonesian dictionary and followed by analysis of each word in the form of a formula and its meaning so that these words can be utilized in teaching Arabic according to the variations of the words. Study result prive: 1) Whereas in the Sasak-Indonesian dictionary there are 91 Sasak language vocabularies from Arabic (letter S to Z). 2) Based on the available data, there are four forms of meaning changes in the absorption words from Arabic into the Sasak language, namely: Arabic vocabulary which contains the same meaning in Sasak language, Arabic vocabulary which has expanded meaning in Sasak language, Arabic vocabulary who experienced a narrowing of meaning in Sasak language vocabulary that experienced a change in meaning in Sasak language. 3) These absorption words can be used for teaching Arabic for the Sasak tribe in various ways and methods.
Metodologi Al-Fiqh Al-Muqāran: Pendekatan dan Dampaknya Pada Perbedaan Pendapat Fiqh Wipkil Bashor; Muhammad Furqon Almurni; Sofyan Al-Hakim; Jajang Komaludin; Jajat Sudrajat
IQTISHOD: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Volume 4 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025
Publisher : STAI Al-Mas'udiyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69768/ji.v4i1.68

Abstract

This research focuses on exploring the methods used by scholars in studying comparative fiqh (al-Fiqh al-Muqāran), the reasons behind differing opinions among them, and the benefits that can be gained from studying comparative fiqh. Utilizing a literature study approach and descriptive analysis, this research reveals that: (1) The process of comparative fiqh is conducted through comparison and critique of contradictory opinions to achieve scientific clarity, which includes weighing, identifying similarities and differences, investigating the reasons for differences, and finding solutions through compromise or selecting the more argumentatively strong opinion. (2) Factors causing differences in opinion among jurists include differences in qirā’ah (recitations), irāb (grammatical inflection), ḥadīth narrations, text interpretation, sources of legal deduction (istinbāṯ), and methods of integrating and prioritizing contradictory evidence. (3) The benefits of studying al Fiqh al Muqāran include understanding the basic principles of fiqh schools, the ijtihad approach of the jurists, their method of legal reasoning (istinbāt), and their critique of evidence. Additionally, this study aids in developing fiqh skills, expanding the understanding of ijtihad and its flexibility, understanding the ethics of scholars in dealing with differing opinions to reach the truth, and appreciating the strong foundations behind these differences. This research offers significant insights into the importance of comparative fiqh in enriching Islamic understanding, valuing diversity of opinion, and promoting an attitude of tolerance and respect in the discourse of Islamic scholarship.
Co-Authors Jajang Komaludin Muhammad Furqon Almurni Salman Abu Al-Khair Sofyan Al-Hakim Wipkil Bashor