Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

TAFSIR AYAT DAN HADITS RIBA DAN KAITANNYA DENGAN BUNGA BANK Muhammad Furqon Almurni; Rosihon Anwar; Ending Solehudin
Al - Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir Vol 8 No 02 (2023): Al-Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al Hidayah Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30868/at.v8i02.5430

Abstract

Tujuan dari penulisan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana tafsir ayat-ayat riba dan penjelasan hadits-haidts riba dan bagaimana kaitannya dengan bunga yang banyak dipakai oleh bank-bank konvensional pada saat ini. Jenis penelitian artikel ini adalah kualitatif. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan artikel ini adalah metode deskriptif analisis, yaitu dengan menjelaskan ayat-ayat riba melalui buku-buku tafsir baik tafsir klasik maupun tafsir kontemporer. Melalui tafsir peneliti mengetahui sebab turunnya ayat riba dan menghubungkannya dengan bunga bank pada saat ini. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah riba secara bahasa memiliki arti tambahan sedangkan menurut istilah riba terbagi menjadi dua, yaitu riba nasiah dan riba fadhl. Bunga bank menurut mayoritas ulama kontemporer adalah riba yang diharamkan oleh Al-Qur’an dan Hadits Nabi Muhammad SAW.
Metodologi Al-Fiqh Al-Muqāran: Pendekatan dan Dampaknya Pada Perbedaan Pendapat Fiqh Wipkil Bashor; Muhammad Furqon Almurni; Sofyan Al-Hakim; Jajang Komaludin; Jajat Sudrajat
IQTISHOD: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Volume 4 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025
Publisher : STAI Al-Mas'udiyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69768/ji.v4i1.68

Abstract

This research focuses on exploring the methods used by scholars in studying comparative fiqh (al-Fiqh al-Muqāran), the reasons behind differing opinions among them, and the benefits that can be gained from studying comparative fiqh. Utilizing a literature study approach and descriptive analysis, this research reveals that: (1) The process of comparative fiqh is conducted through comparison and critique of contradictory opinions to achieve scientific clarity, which includes weighing, identifying similarities and differences, investigating the reasons for differences, and finding solutions through compromise or selecting the more argumentatively strong opinion. (2) Factors causing differences in opinion among jurists include differences in qirā’ah (recitations), irāb (grammatical inflection), ḥadīth narrations, text interpretation, sources of legal deduction (istinbāṯ), and methods of integrating and prioritizing contradictory evidence. (3) The benefits of studying al Fiqh al Muqāran include understanding the basic principles of fiqh schools, the ijtihad approach of the jurists, their method of legal reasoning (istinbāt), and their critique of evidence. Additionally, this study aids in developing fiqh skills, expanding the understanding of ijtihad and its flexibility, understanding the ethics of scholars in dealing with differing opinions to reach the truth, and appreciating the strong foundations behind these differences. This research offers significant insights into the importance of comparative fiqh in enriching Islamic understanding, valuing diversity of opinion, and promoting an attitude of tolerance and respect in the discourse of Islamic scholarship.