Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Architecture and Urbanism
Rezky Ariessa Dewi
Department Of Civil Engineering, Faculty Of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Padang Bulan, Medan 20155, Indonesia
Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Energy Environmental Science Public Health Social Sciences Transportation

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Quantity Take Off Comparison Using Building Information Modelling (BIM) with Autodesk Revit Software and Traditional Method Fredrick Jeremia Simatupang; Gina Cynthia Raphita Hasibuan; Indra Jaya; Syahrizal; Rezky Ariessa Dewi; Gea Geby Aurora Syafridon
International Journal of Architecture and Urbanism Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): International Journal of Architecture and Urbanism
Publisher : Talenta Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/ijau.v8i2.16146

Abstract

Nowadays, the development of technological advances and information has grown rapidly in various aspects including the development of construction projects. One of the construction technology innovations is Building Information Modeling (BIM). Obstacles that are often or commonly encountered in the implementation of construction projects are delays or delays in work, rework, and inaccuracies in the calculation of the required quantity. The problems caused by conventional methods can be minimized by utilizing construction technology, namely BIM at the construction stage. This research aims to compare the volume of traditional (conventional methods) and BIM methods. This research uses a comparative research method and quantitative approach. In this research, a comparative analysis between conventional methods and BIM methods is carried out. Based on the data analysis that has been carried out, it is found that the BIM results are smaller than the conventional project results with a percentage comparison difference of 8.61% for the volume of concrete work, and 6% for the weight of reinforcement.
Co-Authors Fredrick Jeremia Simatupang Gea Geby Aurora Syafridon Gina Cynthia Raphita Hasibuan Indra Jaya Sembiring, Robi Arianta Syahrizal