Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

EFEKTIVITAS VIDEO YOUTUBE “WONDERFUL INDONESIA: A VISUAL JOURNEY” SEBAGAI SARANA PROMOSI PARIWISATA INDONESIA Atef Fahrudin; Siti Karlinah; Herlina Agustin
Mediakom : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Vol 4, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Gunadarma

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35760/mkm.2020.v4i1.2492

Abstract

Industri pariwisata kini tengah dihadapkan dengan tantangan zaman dengan hadirnya konsep Tourism 4.0 yang mengharuskan Indonesia berbenah diri dalam menghadapi konsep tersebut. Lahirnya tren Tourism 4.0 telah mengubah keseluruhan siklus ekosistem kepariwisataan, termasuk menjadi penyebab bergesernya budaya siber wisatawan yang salah satu contohnya bisa dilihat pada perubahan proses pengambilan keputusan berwisata orang-orang di era ini, dimana orang-orang menjadikan media sosial sebagai sumber rujukan dalam menetapkan destinasi wisata mereka. Kolom komentar di YouTube kadang-kadang menjadi sebuah review bagi siapapun yang membacanya, dikarenakan orang-orang menuliskan pendapat ataupun pengalaman mereka terkait konten disana. Hal ini membuat YouTube memungkinakan untuk menjadi sarana promosi termasuk didalamnya promosi destinasi pariwisata. Penelitian ini di buat dengan tujuan untuk mencari tahu sejauh mana efektifitas video yang diunggah di YouTube sebagai sarana untuk mempromosikan destinasi pariwisata Indonesia.
Framing Dedi Mulyadi's Vasectomy Policy in International Media: A Comparative Analysis Using Entman's Framing Theory and Its Implications for Indonesia's Public Diplomacy Tris Dina Susanti; Atef Fahrudin
INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : FAKULTAS DAKWAH UIN SALATIGA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/inject.v10i2.5045

Abstract

This study examines the international media's portrayal of the vasectomy policy as a prerequisite for accessing social assistance, as proposed by West Java Governor Dedi Mulyadi. Using Robert Entman's theoretical framework, this research examines how three international media outlets (Channel News Asia, South China Morning Post, and The Telegraph) frame this controversial policy through four key elements: problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and treatment recommendation. The research method employs qualitative framing analysis with a systematic approach to the news corpus from the three media outlets. Results indicate that all three media outlets use negative framing with a dominance of moral evaluation (90%) and problem definition (85%), yet with different strategies: SCMP uses a "discriminatory policy" frame (9/10), Telegraph emphasizes "human rights violation" (8/10), and CNA employs a "governance problem" approach (7/10). Differences in intensity and editorial tone reflect the geographical and ideological orientations of each media outlet, with the SCMP being the most critical, the Telegraph focusing on international human rights standards, and CNA adopting a more contextual approach to the complexities of Southeast Asia. This study confirms the relevance of Entman's theory in the digital era and reveals that treatment recommendation is the most diverse element in international framing. These findings offer strategic implications for Indonesia's public diplomacy, suggesting the development of targeted and proactive communication strategies in response to the evolving global media landscape.
Constructing 'the Best Interests of the Child' in Digital Space Governance: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Government Regulation No. 17 of 2025 Atef Fahrudin
Jurnal Komputer, Informasi dan Teknologi Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Penerbit Jurnal Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53697/jkomitek.v6i1.3802

Abstract

This study aims to examine how the concept of "the best interests of the child" is constructed in Indonesia's Government Regulation No. 17 of 2025 concerning Electronic System Governance for Child Protection, and to identify the digital child protection paradigm embedded within this regulatory framework. The method employed is Norman Fairclough's Critical Discourse Analysis, examining the regulation through three dimensions: textual analysis of lexicon, grammar, and modality; discursive practice analysis of production, consumption, and intertextuality; and social practice analysis of power relations and underlying ideologies. The results reveal that "the best interests of the child" is operationalized through three fundamental dimensions: normative prioritization placing children's rights above commercial interests (Article 8b), age-appropriate design mechanisms with five granular age categories (Article 20), and privacy by design approach shifting from reactive to anticipatory protection (Articles 2, 10). The regulation constructs a hybrid paternalistic-participatory paradigm, mandating parental consent while providing children limited agency through reporting mechanisms (Articles 9, 23). Notably, it prohibits profiling and deceptive design, fundamentally challenging surveillance capitalism's business model. State-centric governance with stringent corporate accountability characterizes the power relations, adopting UK's Age-Appropriate Design Code principles with contextual adaptations. The conclusion indicates that PP 17/2025 successfully translates abstract principles into enforceable technical obligations, positioning Indonesia within global regulatory convergence while maintaining local contextualization, though implementation challenges remain regarding digital literacy gaps, cross-border enforcement, age verification mechanisms, and cultural pluralism considerations.