Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Tanggung Jawab Hukum Perbankan Terhadap Nasabah Kartu Kredit Macet Akibat Kurang Menerapkan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Dalam Penerbitan Kartu Kepada Nasabah Ester Simanungkalit; Hedwig Adianto Mau; Gatut Hendro TW
SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Vol 9, No 4 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v9i4.27252

Abstract

The application of the principle of customer protection against bad credit cards due to not applying the precautionary principle causes financial losses to customers so that there is a need for legal rules to protect customers in the event of a bad credit dispute. The author uses a descriptive qualitative method, the results of the research in this paper are where the legal protection of banking for bad credit card customers is due to not applying the precautionary principle in issuing cards to customers. The results of the study stated that bad credit card disputes often occur for various reasons, where all credit card issuers should have implemented the regulations as stated in the PBI (Bank Indonesia Regulations). Settlement in the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) and complaints to OJK as regulated in OJK Regulation No. 1/POJK.07/2013 concerning Consumer Protection in the financial services sector which contains efforts that can be taken by customers as a form of customer protection. If the customer is unable to pay the Bank's arrears, the Bank usually reports to the Bank Indonesia Debtor Information System which results in the recipient of the credit card bill being included in the bad credit blacklist of Bank Indonesia, resulting in the recipient of the credit card bill not being able to apply for capital credit to various financial institutions.Keywords: Banking Law; Bad credit card; Banking Customers AbstrakPenerapan prinsip perlindungan nasabah terhadap kartu kredit macet akibat kurang menerapkan prinsip kehati-hatian menimbulkan kerugian financial terhadap nasabah sehingga perlunya aturan hukum untuk melindungi nasabah apabila terjadi sengketa kredit macet. Penulis menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif, hasil penelitian pada tulisan ini adalah dimana perlindungan hukum perbankan terhadap nasabah kartu kredit macet akibat kurang menerapkan prinsip kehati-hatian dalam penerbitan kartu kepada nasabah. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa seringnya terjadi sengketa kartu kredit macet dengan beragam alasan, dimana seharusnya seluruh penerbit kartu kredit sudah menjalankan peraturan sesuai yang tercamtum dalam PBI (Peraturan Bank Indonesia). Penyelesaian dalam Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) dan pengaduan kepada OJK yang diatur dalam Peraturan OJK No. 1/POJK.07/2013 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen sektor jasa keuangan yang memuat upaya-upaya yang dapat ditempuh oleh nasabah sebagai bentuk perlindungan nasabah. Jika nasabah tidak mampu membayar tunggakan tangihan Bank, Bank biasanya melakukan pelaporan kepada Sistem Informasi Debitur Bank Indoesia yang mengakibatkan penerima tagihan kartu kredit masuk dalam daftar blacklist kredit macet Bank Indonesia sehingga mengakibatkan penerima surat tagihan kartu kredit tidak bisa mengajukan kredit modal ke berbagai lembaga keuangan.Kata Kunci: Hukum Perbankan; Kartu kredit Macet; Nasabah Perbankan
Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Atas Pembagian Hasil Pemberesan Harta Pailit Oleh Kurator M Firman Bangun; Achmad Fitrian; Gatut Hendro TW
SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Vol 9, No 6 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v9i5.27737

Abstract

In the Professional Standards for Curators and Administrators issued by the Association of Curators and Administrators of Indonesia (AKPI), a curator is defined as an individual or civil association that possesses the special expertise required to manage and settle bankrupt assets and that has been registered with the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, as outlined in Articles 69 and 70 of the Bankruptcy Law and its implementing regulations. In this study, the author employs a qualitative descriptive research methodology. The results of this study are to find out what the process and mechanism for the implementation of the distribution of proceeds from the bankruptcy estate by the curator to each creditor against a decision that has permanent legal force (inkracht) and then also discusses the legal protection for creditors against the implementation of the distribution of settlement proceeds. bankrupt assets by the curator if there are objections to the value of the distribution.Keywords: Curator; Creditors; Bankruptcy Assets  Abstrak Dalam Standar Profesi Kurator dan Pengurus yang diterbitkan oleh Asosiasi Kurator dan Pengurus Indonesia (AKPI) dijelaskan kurator adalah perseorangan atau persekutuan perdata yang memiliki keahlian khusus sebagaimana diperlukan untuk mengurus dan membereskan harta pailit dan telah terdaftar pada Departemen Kehakiman dan Hak Asasi Manusia, sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 69 dan 70 Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan peraturan pelaksanaannya. Dalam penelitian ini digunakan metode penelitian kualittatif deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bahwa seperti apa proses dan mekanisme pelaksanaan pembagian hasil pemberesan harta pailit oleh kurator kepada masing-masing kreditor terhadap putusan yang sudah berkekuatan hukum tetap (inkracht) dan kemudian juga membahas mengenai perlindungan hukum bagi para kreditur terhadap pelaksanaan pembagian hasil pemberesan harta pailit oleh kurator jika terjadi keberatan-keberatan atas nilai pembagian tersebut.Kata Kunci: Kurator; Kreditor; Harta Pailiti
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Nasabah Cryptocurrency Di Indonesia Karina Christiani; Arief Wibisono; Gatut Hendro TW
SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Vol 9, No 5 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v9i5.27644

Abstract

Regulation of money or currency in Indonesia is based on Law (UU) Number 7 of 2011 concerning Currency. Money is a symbol of state sovereignty that must be respected and proud of by all Indonesian citizens. In this study, the author discusses the implementation of cryptocurrency transactions in Indonesia according to the Regulation of the Commodity Futures Trading Supervisory Agency Number 5 of 2019 concerning Technical Provisions for the Implementation of the Physical Market for Crypto Assets (Crypto Assets) on the Futures Exchange, and discusses the Legal Protection in Cryptocurrency Transactions according to the Agency Regulations. Commodity Futures Trading Supervisor Number 5 of 2019 concerning Technical Provisions for the Implementation of the Physical Crypto Asset Market on the Futures Exchange in Indonesia. This writing uses descriptive qualitative method. The results of the study state that legal protection for the community is currently familiar with digital transactions and specifically during this pandemic.Keywords: Legal Protection; Cryptocurrencies; Crypto Asset AbstrakPengaturan uang atau mata uang di Indonesia didasarkan pada Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 7 Tahun 2011 tentang Mata Uang. Uang merupakan simbol kedaulatan negara yang harus dihormati dan dibanggakan oleh seluruh warga negara Indonesia. Dalam Penelitian ini, penulis membahas mengenai Pelaksanaan Transaksi cryptocurrency di Indonesia menurut Peraturan Badan Pengawas Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditi Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 Tentang Ketentuan Teknis Penyelenggaraan Pasar Fisik Aset Kripto (Crypto Asset ) Di Bursa Berjangka, dan membahas tentang Perlindungan Hukum Dalam Transaksi Cryptocurrency Menurut Peraturan Badan Pengawas Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditi Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 Tentang Ketentuan Teknis Penyelenggaraan Pasar Fisik Aset Kripto (Crypto Asset) Di Bursa Berjangka di Indonesia. Penulisan ini menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif. Adapun hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa perlindungan hukum terhadap masyarakat saat ini sudah banyak mengenal transaksi digital dan khusus dimasa pandemic ini.Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum; Cryptocurrency; Crypto Asset