Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Normative Analysis of Unlawful Acts of State Administrative Officials Related to the Implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions Ridwan Muhammad; Irham Rosyidi; Nam Rumkel
International Journal of Education, Information Technology, and Others Vol 4 No 4 (2021): International Journal of Education, information technology and others
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (163.139 KB) | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5775445

Abstract

This study aimed at determining and finding: (1) whether the unlawful act of the State Administrative Officers as a Defendant was caused by the Article formulation 116 (2) and paragraph (3) of Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment of Law Number 5 of 2009 1986 concerning the State Administrative Court; and 2) the legal consequences if the defendant (TUN official) does not implement the decision of the State Administrative Decision. By using normative legal research methods which is examining secondary data or library materials that are focused on testing the application of norms in positive law; Analyzing unlawful acts committed by State Administrative Officers (Mayor of Tidore Kepulauan) because State Administrative Court Decisions State which has permanent legal force were not implemented. The results of the study indicated that (1) There was an unlawful act committed by the State Administrative Officers, in this case the Mayor of Tidore Kepulauan, which was not carried out by Ambon State Administrative Court Decision Number: 10/G/2015/PTUN.ABN on November 12, 2005. (2) There was a legal uncertainty as the decisions by the Mayor of Tidore Kepulauan were not implemented, so Ambon State Administrative Court's decision had neither been effective nor legally certain. (3) Those problems were caused by Article 116 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of Law Number 5 of 1986 which handed over the implementation of Ambon Administrative Court decision to the defendant (Contrarius Atus principle). (4) There was a legal uncertainty for the plaintiff. 5) Unclear guarantees of the rights of the plaintiffs
Efektivitas Fungsi Pembinaan di Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak Kelas II Ternate: Kajian Normatif-Empiris terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Rahmat Syarif; Nam Rumkel; Irham Rosyidi
Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Volume 5 Nomor 3 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Actual Insight

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56393/nomos.v5i3.3491

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas fungsi pembinaan di Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak (LPKA) Kelas II Ternate terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Secara normatif, undang-undang ini menekankan pentingnya pendekatan keadilan restoratif serta pembinaan yang berfokus pada perlindungan, pendidikan, dan reintegrasi sosial bagi Anak Didik Pemasyarakatan (Andikpas). Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan normatif-empiris. Teknik pengumpulan data berupa studi kepustaan serta wawancara observasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tingkat residivisme anak binaan mencerminan masih belum optimalnya fungsi pembinaan. Kelemahan aspek kompetensi sumber daya manusia serta keterbatasa sarana dan prasarana pembiaan. Program pembinaan belum dapat diakses secara merata oleh seluruh Andikpas. Lemahnya dukungan dari keluarga dan masyarakat serta kurang efektifnya koordinasi antar-lembaga turut menjadi faktor penghambat dalam mencapai tujuan pembinaan. Penguatan kebijakan, peningkatan kapasitas SDM, diperlukan, dan pemenuhan sarana prasarana sesuai amanat perundang-undangan untuk sistem pembinaan efektif, manusiawi, dan berkelanjutan bagi anak.