Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Jurnal Pencerah Bangsa
Alvi Syahrin
Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sumatera Utara
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Gratifikasi Oleh Perusahaan Farmasi Terhadap Dokter Dalam Pelayanan Medis Di Rumah Sakit Roni Pardamean Gultom; Alvi Syahrin; Madiasa Ablisar; Mahmud Mulyadi
Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Vol 3, No 2 (2022): Juni - September
Publisher : Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55357/is.v3i2.239

Abstract

The occurrence of gratification in this day and age has entered all sectors without exception in the health sector, namely in the field of medicine. The existence of gratification carried out by pharmaceutical companies against doctors, namely where the pharmaceutical company in promoting drugs uses collusion in the form of cooperation with doctors by providing commissions or incentives to doctors for every drug prescription writing to patients where this is an agreement made between pharmaceutical companies with the doctor. There is an effect of giving something to a civil servant doctor by a pharmaceutical company so that the doctor's freedom and independence in writing prescriptions for patients is lost. Doctors tend to prescribe drugs made by pharmaceutical companies, which are something that is delicious to doctors, so that the drug is expensive and results in a monopoly and the need for consumer protection. The doctor can be qualified as a Gratification Crime as regulated in Article 12B
Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengangkutan Elpiji Tanpa Izin Usaha Pengangkutan (Studi Putusan PN. Malang No. 720/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.Mlg. dan Putusan PN. Palangkaraya No. 335/Pid.Sus/2016/PN. Plk) Alvi Syahrin; M Hamdan; Jusmadi Sikumbang; Jivo Sulistiawan
Jurnal Pencerah Bangsa Vol 3, No 1 (2023): Juli - Desember
Publisher : Jurnal Pencerah Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Licensing procedures for transporting LPG according to the laws and regulations in Indonesia are technically not regulated in Law Number 22 Year 2001 concerning Oil and Gas and Government Regulation Number 36 of 2004 concerning Downstream Oil and Gas Business Activities which have been amended by Government Regulation Number 30 of 2009. The prosecution of business actors carrying out transportation of LPG without transportation business permits consists of principal penalties, namely imprisonment, imprisonment, criminal penalties as stipulated in Article 53 letter b of Act Number 22 of 2001 concerning Oil and Gas and also criminal additions consisting of revocation of rights or seizure of goods used for or obtained from criminal acts in Oil and Gas business activities included in Article 58 of Act Number 22 of 2001 concerning Oil and Gas
Kedudukan Bukti Elektronik Untuk Membangun Keyakinnan Hakim Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Umum (Studi kasus perkara pembunuhan berencana atas Nama Jessica Kumala Wongso) Kuo Bratakusuma; Alvi Syahrin; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Mahmud Mulyadi
Jurnal Pencerah Bangsa Vol 3, No 2 (2024): JPB
Publisher : Jurnal Pencerah Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Judge in the decision of the Central Jakarta District Court No. 777/Pid.B/ 2016/PN.JKT.PST in conjunction with the Jakarta High Court Decision No. 393/PID/2016/PT.DKI jo the Supreme Court Decision No. 498 K/PID/2017 believes that the death of the victim of a crime is based on poison that enters his body through coffee. This is based on evidence presented in court, including CCTV. This research is a normative and descriptive analytical study that describes and analyzes a phenomenon related to the Position of Electronic Evidence to Build Judges' Conviction in General Crime Cases (Case Study of Planned Murder Cases on behalf of Jessica Kumala Wongso). The results of the study, the legal rules for electronic evidence in criminal procedural law in Indonesia are not contained or included in the Criminal Procedure Code, but are contained in several regulations that regulate specific crimes, namely: Article 5 of Law No. 11 of 2008, Article 41 of Law no. 36 of 1999, Article 26 A of Law no. 20 of 2001, Article 44 paragraph (2) of Law No. 30 of 2002, Article 27 of Law no. 15 of 2003, Article 29 of Law no. 21 of 2007, Article 24 of Law no. 44 of 2008, Article 96 letter f of Law no. 32 of 2009, Article 86 paragraph (2) of Law no. 35 of 2009, Article 73 letter b of Law No. 8 of 2010 and Article 38 of Law no. 9 of 2013
Co-Authors Jivo Sulistiawan Jusmadi Sikumbang Kuo Bratakusuma M Hamdan Madiasa Ablisar Mahmud Mulyadi Roni Pardamean Gultom Sunarmi, Sunarmi