Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Pengaruh Faktor Individu dan Sosial terhadap Perkembangan Wirausaha Sosial Berkelanjutan dengan Politik Sebagai Faktor Penentu Latifah Hanum; Irwan Noor; Lestari Eko Wahyudi
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 12 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jish.v12i2.62081

Abstract

This research examines the role of social entrepreneurship in reducing dependency and socioeconomic inequalities amidst uncertainty, openness, and global competition. Social-political environmental factors are the focus of the study to understand their influence on the development of social entrepreneurship. Through a survey with questionnaires and analysis using the Smart PLS method, this research aims to provide new insights into the literature on social entrepreneurship and related values. The research findings reveal that the growth of social entrepreneurship aligns with the inability of the formal sector to absorb abundant labor. Individual, social, and political factors are crucial in developing Sustainable Social Entrepreneurship. Motivation, creativity, leadership, family support, social networks, community relationships, policies, and political regulations all influence the success of sustainable social entrepreneurship. However, regulatory barriers and bureaucracy can hinder the growth of social entrepreneurship. This study provides insights to policymakers for developing policies that support the development of social entrepreneurship. By understanding the importance of social-political environmental factors in the context of social entrepreneurship, sustainable and impactful social entrepreneurship can be fostered within society.
The Relationship between Work Experience, Qualifications, Performance, and Staff Perception of Digital Talent in the Workplace Irwan Noor; Nur Ambulani
Jurnal Optimasi Sistem Industri Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023): Published in May 2023
Publisher : The Industrial Engineering Department of Engineering Faculty at Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (308.144 KB) | DOI: 10.25077/josi.v22.n1.p31-37.2023

Abstract

The biggest challenge in developing digital talent in tertiary institutions is viewing digital reform as a massive entity. Therefore, it is rare to focus on the values of developing digital talent for existing education personnel. Using a growth theory mindset, the research focuses on Working Period, Performance, and Qualification, to see the relationship with Talented education staff. The research uses a sequential explanatory design. The sample consisted of 29 ASNs in one of the faculties of a state university in Indonesia, with random sampling using the online Sample Size Calculator. Questionnaire data were analyzed by SPSS, while interviews with NVivo-12 Pro. The results reveal that both the Working Period, Qualification, and Performance variables correlate with the Talented education of staff. The direction of the relationship also has a positive (+) value. However, qualitative analysis revealed that the activities carried out were more directed at fulfilling the main duties and functions. Behind that, the biggest challenge for them is when dealing with students, who generally come from the digital generation. Therefore, digital reform in higher education also pays attention to developing digital talent for education staff.
Beyond Digital Efficiency: Reconstructing Public Value Through Citizen Satisfaction in Adaptive Governance Irwan Noor; Hefry Johan Ferdhianza; Dwi Shema Regina; Alya Putri Indrayanti; Shofy Wildan Maulana; Eka Nanda Dwi Aprilia
Spirit Publik: Jurnal Administrasi Publik Vol 21, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/sp.v21i1.110911

Abstract

Digital transformation in public administration is often claimed to generate public value, yet its linking mechanisms remain contested. This study proposes the Public Value Mediation Model in Digital Service Transformation, positioning citizen satisfaction as a transmission mechanism between technological improvements and the formation of perceived public value, as a conceptual contribution to the adaptive governance paradigm, in which adaptivity indicators are operationalized through service responsiveness and flexibility. Departing from Moore's (1995) normative approach, this study operationalizes public value as citizens' subjective assessments of service quality. The study employs an explanatory quantitative design, using a survey of 220 digital service users in Malang City, selected to represent a mid-sized city with measurable digital divides, relevant for testing the limits of digital efficiency claims under uneven infrastructure conditions, with 27 five-point Likert items. The dependent variable is operationalized as a composite public value score. Analysis employs Ordinal Logistic Regression; mediation was tested using the Sobel test, chosen for its suitability with ordinal data, despite its sensitivity limitations compared to bootstrapping. Results show that accessibility (β=0.298, p<0.01) and response speed (β=0.314, p<0.001) significantly enhance satisfaction, which in turn strengthens public value (β=0.382, p<0.001), with 40% partial mediation (Nagelkerke R²=0.642). Critical finding: participation dimensions consistently scored lower than efficiency, indicating a significant efficiency–participation trade-off evidence that digitalization has yet to expand the democratic space of public services. Technological innovation does not automatically generate public value without meaningful citizen experience and attention to the digital divide.
Analysis of Flood Management Effectiveness Through the Implementation of Drainage Revitalization Policies: A Systematic Literature Review Sofia Ayu Anggraini Sulu Lazar; Irwan Noor; Niken Lastiti V.A
Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): September
Publisher : MASI Mandiri Edukasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58421/misro.v5i3.1826

Abstract

Urban flooding has become increasingly frequent due to rapid urbanization, climate change, and the limited capacity of drainage infrastructure, prompting growing scholarly attention to the effectiveness of drainage revitalization policies across countries. However, the literature examining the relationship between policy implementation and flood management effectiveness remains fragmented across different disciplines and methodological approaches, and has not yet been systematically synthesized. This study aims to identify, evaluate, and synthesize scientific literature on the effectiveness of flood management through the implementation of drainage revitalization policies, using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach based on the PRISMA 2020 framework. Literature searches were conducted in Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, MDPI, and Scopus databases using the keywords policy implementation, drainage revitalization, flood management effectiveness, and flood management policy implementation, resulting in 41 relevant articles selected from an initial pool of 312 studies after undergoing the stages of identification, screening, eligibility assessment, and inclusion. The synthesis identified four major themes influencing flood management effectiveness through drainage revitalization: governance and institutional coordination; technical and infrastructural capacity; community participation and social adaptation; and approaches based on natural processes and geomorphology. The findings indicate that the success of drainage policies is consistently determined by the quality of implementation, particularly communication, resources, implementers' disposition, and bureaucratic structure, as proposed by Edwards III (1980), rather than solely by the scale of investment in physical infrastructure. This study concludes that flood management effectiveness results from a multidimensional interaction among policy quality, infrastructure performance, and institutional capacity. Therefore, future evaluations of drainage policies should integrate these three dimensions simultaneously to achieve more effective and sustainable urban flood management.