Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Influence of Idependent Learning and Independent Campus Program on Students Quality Improvement Murah, Murah; Mashur, Mashur; Nurhasanah, Nurhasanah; Rahman, Imam Aulia
International Journal of Education, Management, and Technology Vol 2 No 3 (2024): International Journal of Education, Management, and Technology
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ijemt.v2i3.4155

Abstract

The implementation of the MBKM (Independent Learning and Independent Campus)program in universities needs to be evaluated so that its impact on students and universities can be known. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of MBKM (Independent Learning and Independent Campus)on improving the quality of students at Gunung Rinjani University. The research method applied was the causal associative method with a quantitative approach. The population in this study were 273 Gunung Rinjani University students. The research sample was 40 people who participated in the MBKM (Independent Learning and Independent Campus) program with the Purposive sampling technique. The data collection technique used a questionnaire via Google Form and documentation. Data analysis through the stages of classical assumption testing, simple linear regression testing and hypothesis testing with the heled of SPSS. The results of the study obtained a variable regression coefficient of 1.249, which means that the MBKM (Independent Learning and Independent Campus)Program variable has a positive and significant effect on improving the quality of Gunung Rinjani University students. The results of the t-test obtained a significant value for the MBKM (Independent Learning and Independent Campus)Program variable (X) of 0.00, where this value was smaller than the probability value determined by the researcher of 0.05, while the calculated t value obtained was 6.850> from the t-table value of 2.021, so it can be concluded that the MBKM (Independent Learning and Independent Campus)Program variable has a positive and significant effect on improving the quality of students at Gunung Rinjani University.
Impact Investing vs. Philanthropy: A Comparative Analysis of Funding Models for Long-Term Sustainability in Social Entrepreneurship Murah, Murah; Rahman, Rashid; Harris, Robert
Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Creative Technology Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/jseact.v2i4.2595

Abstract

Social entrepreneurship has emerged as a critical force for addressing complex global challenges. However, the long-term sustainability of these ventures remains a significant hurdle. A central debate within the sector concerns the efficacy of its two primary funding paradigms: traditional grant-based philanthropy, which prioritizes social outcomes, and market-driven impact investing, which demands both social and financial returns. This research provides a rigorous comparative analysis of impact investing and philanthropic funding models. It specifically investigates how each model distinctly influences the long-term operational and financial sustainability, scalability, and mission integrity of established social enterprises. A qualitative, multiple case study methodology was employed. The study analyzed a purposively selected sample of (n=12) mature social enterprises, stratified into two cohorts: six funded primarily by philanthropy and six funded primarily by impact capital. Data were gathered via semi-structured interviews with founders/CEOs and longitudinal analysis of organizational reports and financial statements. The findings indicate that philanthropic funding is essential for early-stage risk-taking and deep-impact programming but often correlates with restricted growth and long-term funding dependency. Conversely, impact investing successfully drives operational discipline and scalability. This model, however, introduces significant pressures that increase the risk of “mission drift” as enterprises prioritize financial benchmarks over core social objectives. Neither funding model is unilaterally superior. The research concludes that long-term sustainability in social entrepreneurship is not an “either/or” proposition. It is best achieved through a strategically phased, hybrid financial ecosystem that leverages philanthropy for mission-critical capacity-building and impact investing for scaling proven, market-based solutions.