Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal REPERTORIUM Rechstaat Nieuw : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Journal of Sharia (JOSH) Journal of Innovative and Creativity Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice
Aris Setyo Nugroho, Aris Setyo
Unknown Affiliation
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
PENERAPAN ASAS ITIKAD BAIK PADA FASE PRA KONTRAK DALAM HUKUM CIVIL LAW DAN COMMON LAW Nugroho, Aris Setyo
REPERTORIUM Vol 1, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : REPERTORIUM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

AbstractThe principle of good faith is the foundation that underlies every major manufacture of agreement / contract. All models applicable legal system, both civil law and common law is always based on the principle of good faith to provide justice for the parties to make an agreement and a statement of entry into force of a treaty. civil law system to apply to the agreement since the negotiation stage or pre-contract. Unlike the common law system is declared valid since fulfilled the terms of a written agreement validity, but in the development of the theory of Estoppel raised to protect the parties.AbstrakAsas itikad baik merupakan landasan utama yang mendasari setiap pembuatan perjanjian/kontrak. Semua model system hukum yang berlaku, baik civil law maupun common law selalu berdasarkan atas asas itikad baik untuk memberikan keadilan bagi para pihak yang membuat kesepakatan dan sebagai pernyataan berlakunya suatu perjanjian. Sistem civil law menyatakan berlakunya perjanjian sejak tahap negosiasi atau pra kontrak. Berbeda dengan system common law yang dinyatakan berlaku sejak terpenuhinya syarat-syarat sahnya perjanjian secara tertulis, namun dalam perkembangan dimunculkan teori Estoppel untuk melindungi para pihak.
KONTRADIKSI GUGATAN SEDERHANA DALAM UPAYA MEWUJUDKAN PERADILAN SEDERHANA, CEPAT DAN BIAYA RINGAN Aris Setyo Nugroho
RECHTSTAAT NIEUW: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): Maret 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52429/rn.v6i2.116

Abstract

Gugatan Sederhana yang diatur dalam PERMA Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana sebagaimana diubah dengan PERMA Nomor 4 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana menjadi pilihan upaya hukum bagi Kreditor dalam mengatasi persoalan kredit macet oleh debitor, serta tantangan untuk mencapai tujuan peradilan yang Sederhana, Cepat dan Biaya Ringan. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian normatif, dengan data sekunder berupa studi kepustakaan, serta menggunakan metode analisis secara kualitatif dari data yang diperoleh dianalisa dan ditarik kesimpulan. Hasil pembahasan penyelesaian melalui gugatan sederhana dalam penyelesaian kredit diketahui bahwa penyelesaian kredit menggunakan gugatan sederhana dapat berpotensi menimbulkan permasalahan lain terkait dengan efektifitas dan efisiensi biaya yang tidak dapat terpenuhi menyebabkan mengurangi profit perbankan dalam jasa pemberian kredit, sehingga diperlukan kebijakan penentuan keputusan yang tepat serta analisa cost and benefit bagi perbankan, selain perlunya harmonisasi ketentuan peraturan perundang undangan terkait.
Pemberian Amnesti Dan Abolisi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Tinjauan Hukum Dan Analisis Keadilan Prosedural Hidayah, Siti; Nugroho, Aris Setyo
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice
Publisher : CV. Kurnia Grup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61476/9xb5bh53

Abstract

The phenomenon of granting amnesty to Hasto Kristiyanto and abolition to Tom Lembong in 2025 has raised serious public debate, especially regarding the potential politicization of these legal instruments. Writer discusses the practice of granting amnesties and abolitions in corruption crimes in Indonesia, with a focus on analyzing procedural justice and legal proportionality. The research uses a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and philosophical approaches. The results of the study show that the involvement of the Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) in the consideration of amnesty and abolition has the potential to shift the President's prerogative function into a negotiation and  political instrument. This condition can weaken the principle of justice, eliminate the deterrent effect, and damage legal consistency. Therefore, the amnesty and abolition mechanism needs to be reformulation to be in line with the principle of proportional justice and ensure legal certainty.
Mediasi Penal Sebagai Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Insan Pribadi; Aris Setyo Nugroho
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v5i2.3374

Abstract

Penal mediation is a form of criminal case resolution outside of formal judicial mechanisms, emphasizing an agreement between the perpetrator and victim facilitated by a neutral third party. This approach aligns with the principles of restorative justice, which aim to restore victims' losses, improve social relationships, and avoid the negative impacts of conventional criminal justice. In the Indonesian criminal justice system, penal mediation is beginning to gain attention through regulations and policies. In practice, law enforcement faces numerous challenges and efforts in implementing restorative justice, including limitations in its application to certain crimes and the risk of abuse of authority. This confirms that penal mediation has great potential as a humane and efficient instrument in law enforcement, but requires a stronger legal framework, strict oversight, and education for both law enforcement officials and the public
Digitalisasi Pembuktian Elektronik dalam Sengketa Wanprestasi Transaksi Fintech Syamsiah, Desi; Nugroho, Aris Setyo; Damayanti, Elvina Eka
JOSH: Journal of Sharia Vol. 5 No. 01 (2026): Vol. 05 No. 01 Januari 2026
Publisher : Universitas Sunan Drajat Lamongan, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55352/josh.v5i01.2436

Abstract

The development of financial technology (fintech) as an innovation that integrates technology in financial services has changed the paradigm of economic transactions. Financial Technology (Fintech) is the implementation of information technology utilization in the financial system that produces new products, services, and business models as stipulated in Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 19/12/PBI/2017. Along with the increase in fintech transactions, there has also been an increase in default disputes involving electronic evidence in their resolution. The main challenge that arises is the validity of electronic evidence in the trial of default disputes in fintech transactions. In Indonesia, electronic evidence has a legal basis through Law No. 11 of 2008 jo. Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions which recognizes the existence of electronic documents as valid evidence. This writing uses a normative juridical method by analyzing the laws and regulations on electronic transactions and civil procedural law. The results of the writing show that the electronic evidence system still faces technical and juridical obstacles in its application, especially regarding authentication, data security, and standardization in the examination of electronic evidence in court.
Co-Authors Damayanti, Elvina Eka Insan Pribadi Siti Hidayah Syamsiah, Desi