Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam Misykat: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Al-QurÆan, Hadist, Syariah dan Tarbiyah ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin
Ansor Bahary, Ansor
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
TAFSIR NUSANTARA: Studi kritis terhadap Marah Labid Nawawi al-Bantani Bahary, Ansor
ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam Vol 16, No 2 (2015): Tafsir and Hadith
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (303.544 KB) | DOI: 10.18860/ua.v16i2.3179

Abstract

The interpretation is an effort to understand, to explain the intent, knowing the content of the verses of the Koran. As a result of man's work is different from the Koran, there, the interpretation occurs experiencing developments of classical, medieval to the modern period and even contemporary. Diversity both in the method (manhaj / tariqah), style (nau '), as well as approaches (Alvan) used is unavoidable in a work of interpretation. Although there are also commentaries appear in modern times but its interpretation still follows the pattern of classical and medieval period as confirmed Nawawi al-Bantani in Muqaddimah (Iqtida lil 'bi al-Salaf al-fi Tadwin' ilm) commentary. Therefore, it is no exaggeration when Tafsir Al-Munir or Angry Labid regarded as a bridge between the traditional interpretation to modern times.
Diskursus Ulama Seputar Penafsiran Al-Qur’an Tentang Memilih Kepala Daerah Non-Muslim Di Indonesia Faizin, Afwan; Bahary, Ansor; Sa'dijah, Chalimatus
MISYKAT: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Al-Quran Hadist Syari'ah dan Tarbiyah Vol 8, No 1 (2023): Misykat: Jurnal-ilmu-ilmu Al-Quran, Hadits, Syariah dan Tarbiyah
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Ilmu Al Quran (IIQ) Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33511/misykat.v8n1.61-70

Abstract

This article proves that the interpretation of the Koran is greatly influenced by the socio-political background of the interpreter which influences their interpretation and the choice of approach they use. The regional head election (Pilkada) contest in DKI Jakarta is an arena for seeking the legitimacy of each interpreter for the intent of Qs. al-Ma'idah: 51. On the other hand, a textual approach based on a linguistic approach (al-'ibrah bi' general al-lafdzi) gave birth to an exclusive interpretation in rejecting non-Muslim Regional Head candidates. Meanwhile, the basis of the socio-historical approach ('al-ibrah bi especially al-sabab) is a more inclusive religious foundation that allows non-Muslim Regional Head candidates. The choice of this approach seems to have a reciprocal correlation with the socio-political setting of the interpreter, because in fact the interpretation of awliya' in Qs. Al-Maidah: 51, is neutral. Etymologically it can be interpreted; close, friend, protector, helper, leader, alliance, ally, intimate, lover, soul mate and maybe many more. However, when scholars have a certain tendency, in the end the interpretation of awliya' is brought to the subjective meaning of the interpreter, even though the interpreter claims to have constructed an interpretation that is objective and universal in nature. This research is a field research with a hermeneutic approach. Sources of data are Muslim scholars who are experts in the field of interpretation of the Koran from various backgrounds by purposive sampling according to the expertise of the informants.
Revisiting the Legacy: The Ongoing Discourse on Ḥadīth of Ghadīr Khumm in Shiʻa Studies Bahary, Ansor
ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 25 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/esensia.v25i2.5864

Abstract

The study of the hadith of Ghadīr Khumm has long been at the center of the Sunni-Shiʻa polemic. While previous research primarily focused on analyzing the sanad (chain of transmission) and matan (text), contemporary Shiʻa scholarship has increasingly employed it as a tool to continuously reinforce the doctrine of imāmah and counter Sunni epistemic dominance. This study examines how the hadith of Ghadīr Khumm is utilized in Shiʻa academic discourse by exploring the extent to which the polemic surrounding this hadith has evolved beyond mere authentication and how it functions in response to Sunni historiography. The findings indicate that, although many Sunni sources acknowledge the authenticity of the hadith of Ghadīr Khumm, stark differences in interpretation have led Shiʻa scholars to continue engaging with this hadith academically. This ongoing engagement is driven by the perception that the dissemination of Sunni perspectives remains a dominant force that must be challenged. Recent trends reveal that academic studies are increasingly directed toward integrating hadith interpretation into civilizational narratives as a response to marginalization. However, despite appearing innovative, the underlying argumentative patterns largely follow established precedents. This study opens avenues for further research into how hadith texts hold strong foundational value, ensuring their continued role as primary references in asserting theological legitimacy and shaping the identity of religious sectarian communities within Islam. Keywords: Hadith of Ghadīr Khumm, Sunni-Shiʻa polemic, discourse defense
Co-Authors Faizin, Afwan Sa'dijah, Chalimatus