Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Esensi Hukum Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues
Rocky Marbun, Rocky
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

 1 
Grand Design Politik Hukum Pidana dan Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia Berdasarkan Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945 Marbun, Rocky
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 3 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (609.684 KB)

Abstract

AbstrakPolitik hukum nasional telah menetapkan Indonesia sebagai negara yang berlandaskan hukum (rechtsstaat), sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 1 ayat (3) UUD 1945. Konsep Negara hukum tersebut mengacu kepada jiwa bangsa (volkgeist) yang termuat dalam Pancasila dan Proklamasi Kemerdekaan sebagai sumber dari segala sumber hukum dan penyangga konstitusionalisme. Sistem hukum pidana sebagai bentuk perwujudan politik hukum pidana sudah seharusnya dibentuk dengan penjiwaan UUD 1945 sebagai landasan yuridis. Konsekuensinya, sistem hukum pidana harus dijabarkan secara konkret pada setiap peraturan perundang-undangan. Namun demikian, penjiwaan Pancasila dan Proklamasi Kemerdekaan dalam sistem hukum pidana hingga saat ini belum terwujud dengan baik, misalnya adanya adopsi unsur-unsur asing. Untuk mewujudkan hal tersebut, maka pembentukan politik hukum pidana dan rancangan sistem hukum pidana nasional hendaknya membatasi keberlakuan unsur asing berdasarkan konsep harmonisasi dan sinkronisasi dengan volkgeist Indonesia yang termuat dalam Pancasila dan Proklamasi Kemerdekaan.Kata Kunci: politik hukum pidana, sistem hukum pidana, Pancasila, Proklamasi, jiwa bangsa (volkgeist).Grand Design of the Legal Policy of Criminal Law and Indonesian Criminal Legal System Based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of IndonesiaAbstractThe national legal policy has determined that Indonesia is a state based on Rule of Law, as provided in Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Indonesian Constitution. The concept of Legal State should also refer to the national spirit (volkgeist), as reflected in Pancasila and the Independence Proclamation as the primary source of Law and pillars of constitutionalism. Criminal law system as an enactment of legal policy of criminal law should be formulated based on the 1945 Indonesian Constitution as its juridical basis. Consequently, the criminal legal system must be translated concretely into any legislation considered part of criminal law. However, the formation of Pancasila and the Independence Proclamation has not been actualized properly, for instance: the adoption of foreign elements. Therefore, the national formation and design of the politics of criminal law and criminal legal system should limit those elements based on the concept of harmonization and synchronization with the volkgeist reflected in Pancasila and the Independence Proclamation.Keywords: political criminal law, criminal legal system, Pancasila, Proclamation, national spirit (volkgeist)DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v1n3.a8
Diskursus Perumusan Ideologi Sebagai Perbuatan Pidana dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana 2015 Marbun, Rocky
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 3 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (320.17 KB)

Abstract

Reformasi Hukum Pidana pasca kemerdekaan Indonesia telah dimulai sejak 1963 terhadap Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana sebagai warisan dari kolonial Belanda. Semangat kemerdekaan menginginkan adanya reformasi, bukan hanya terhadap produk hukum yang masih bernuansa kolonialisme, namun juga pada cara pandang atau pola pikir dalam memandang permasalahan hukum. Salah satu pola pikir yang mendapat pengaruh warisan kolonialisme dalam mempertahankan rust en orde (menjaga keamanan dan ketertiban) adalah dengan memasukkan instrumen hukum guna mempertahankan kestabilan politik. Sehingga negara masih memandang urgenitas dari tindakan isolasir terhadap ideologi negara dengan melakukan pelarangan terhadap penyebaran ideologi Komunisme/Marxisme/Leninisme. Faktor terbesar dari perumusan pelarangan tersebut adalah pengalaman hitam bangsa Indonesia terhadap seseorang dan/atau kelompok organisasi yang mengimplementasikan ideologi tersebut dalam kegiatan-kegiatan yang membahayakan keutuhan bangsa. Akibatnya, terdapat ketidakjelasan dan ketidaktegasan dalam membedakan ideologi sebagai hasil olah akal budi yang menghasilkan ilmu pengetahuan dengan perbuatan sebagai perbuatan pidana dalam perumusan serta perancangan Pasal 212 ayat (2) jo. Pasal 219 ayat (2) Rancangan KUHP 2015 oleh pembentuk undang-undang.Discussion of Ideology Formulation as Criminal Acts in the Draft of the Criminal Code 2015AbstractThe reform of Criminal Law in post-independence Indonesia has started since 1963 through the Criminal Code as a legacy of the Dutch colonial. The spirit of independence calls for a reform, not only against the law which still undeniably a product of colonialism, but also to the perspective or mindset of looking at legal issues. One mindset influenced by the legacy of colonialism in defense of rust en orde (maintain security and order) is to include legal instruments in order to maintain political stability. Thus, the state is still looking at the urgency of action against the state ideology isolation by banning the spread of the ideology of Communism/Marxism/Leninism. The biggest factor of the formulation of the ban was the dark experience of the Indonesian people against a person and/or group of organizations which implement that ideology in activities which endanger the integrity of the nation. Consequently, there is obscurity and uncertainty on the difference between ideology as an outcome of common sense which results in knowledge and ideology as a criminal action under the formulation and drafting of Article 212 para 2 jo. Article 219 para 2 of the Draft of the Criminal Code 2015 as drafted by the legislators.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v4n3.a6
Rekonstruksi Sistem Pemidanaan dalam Undang-Undang Perpajakan Berdasarkan Konsep Ultimum Remidium Marbun, Rocky
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 3 (2014)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (221.183 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk%x

Abstract

Implementation of criminal sanctions in the Act No. 28 Year 2007 on General Rules of Taxation, give rise to legal issues in conceptual level. That the Tax Law, is a part of the State Administration Law, requiring forceful measures for taxpayers, especially the Taxable Entrepreneur, which in principle is a form of criminalization of administrative behavior. Criminal Law, through the principle of legality, wants a norm setting strict sanctions and obviously in the legislation, it appears to be broken in the Act No. 28 Year 2007 on General Rules of Taxation. Parameters of the crime of taxation is limited only by the elements of negligence and intentional, with the implementation under based on discretion of of the competent institution. Thus, gave rise the transactional behavior in a practical level. Therefore, the principle of ultimum remedium, becomes extremely important to avoid the use of arbitrary of discretion.
DOMINASI SIMBOLIK DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA BERDASARKAN PERSPEKTIF PIERRE-FELIX BOURDIEU Marbun, Rocky
Esensi Hukum Vol 3 No 1 (2021): Juni - Jurnal Esensi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/esensihukum.v3i1.37

Abstract

Refining activities Legal Studies as a science that is sui generis, in the end, have exposed a pattern of reasoning and legal arguments against the concrete fact to be very rigid and lexical. In fact, law that emerges from a social agreement and grows together with the development of society, has taken a distance (distantiation) from society, which is the origin of the growth of the law itself. It is Pierre-Felix Bourdieu who argues that every social praxis (action) - including the behavior of law enforcers, will always produce knowledge based on legal norms and power - as capital, through the absorption of values that internalize in themself (habitus). This research is a normative legal research with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, a semiotic approach, and a critical discourse analysis approach. The results of this study indicate the consequences that occur through symbolic domination as doxa to defend the interests of the executive law enforcement agency.
Penyuapan Terhadap Pejabat Negara Diluar Kewenangannya: Kasus Bupati Labuhan Batu Utara Mulyadi, Mahmud; Marbun, Rocky
Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues
Publisher : Talenta Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/nlr.v2i1.11373

Abstract

Penyuapan dan Gratifikasi merupakan dua tindak pidana yang memiliki kemiripan dan terkadang sulit untuk dibedakan. Suap ditandai dengan pegawai negeri yang secara aktif memberikan patokan biaya atau fee atas urusan tertentu, sedangkan gratifikasi ditandai dengan pemberi uang atau harta yang secara aktif memberikan imbalan tertentu dengan maksud melancarkan urusannya. Dalam kasus tertentu, pihak yang berurusan dengan pegawai negeri boleh jadi tidak mengetahui secara pasti kewenangan dari pegawai negeri yang akan melaksanakan urusan tertentu, namun olehnya dianggap dapat menyelesaikan urusan tersebut. Kasus Bupati Labuhan Batu Utara merupakan satu diantara kasus tersebut yang diteliti lebih lanjut menggunakan pendekatan normatif dan menggunakan data sekunder berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dan karya-karya ilmiah bidang hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji dakwaan Jaksa Penuntut Umum terhadap Bupati Labuhan Batu Utara. Hasil yang di dapat menggambarkan bahwa dalam kasus penyuapan yang melibatkan Bupati Labuhan Batu Utara, pasal yang tepat untuk diterapkan ialah Pasal 13 Undang-undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang terdapat unsur “oleh pemberi hadiah atau janji dianggap melekat pada jabatan atau kedudukan tersebut”.
KONSEP DIYAT SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PEMIDANAAN DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA UNTUK MENGATASI FENOMENA OVERCAPACITY LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN Marbun, Rocky
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 6 No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.6.2.2017.189-212

Abstract

Through the ecletic-incorporation method and prismatic concept, the concept of diyat which has been modified will make it able to experience the unification of the law for the nation of Indonesia. Through the goodness and excellence of the concept of diyat, the author believes it is an alternative solution to the failure of the Criminal Justice System that is currently used. The main objective of the Paradigm of the Pancasila Law is not just to achieve justice, but also to achieve peace in the life of society, nation and state. Reversing the conditions of the community to its original state (restitutio in integrum) is the main goal in the Paradigm of the Pancasila Law. However, the infiltration process of the concept of diyat, must be realized through in-depth study, in particular against any criminal acts that can be applied. The concept of diyat in its essence also brings about a shrinkage of the powers of the judge in imposing imprisonment against perpetrators of certain crimes that are established by the Political Criminal Law and Criminal Law System in Indonesia, once peace and justice is achieved by the victims and / or their families. The writing of this paper uses normative juridical method with approach to legislation, conceptual approach, philosophical approach and sociological approach. Keywords: diyat, fiqh, jinayat, crime, society
FALLACY (SESAT PIKIR) ARGUMENTUM AD VERECUNDIAM DALAM MOTIVERING VONNIS (PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM) / THE ARGUMENTUM AD VERECUNDIAM FALLACY IN MOTIVERING VONIS (LEGAL REASONING) Marbun, Rocky; Armilius, nfn
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 7 No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.7.2.2018.327-352

Abstract

Munculnya fallacy argumentum ad verecundiam dalam suatu putusan pengadilan merupakan suatu penalaran hukum yang tidak tepat, oleh karena penggunaan otoritas yang tidak dapat dibenarkan berdasarkan Ilmu Hukum, akan berakibat kepada validitas dari amar putusan—yang merupakan konklusi, yang dapat dibatalkan. Sifat pembatalan amar putusan tersebut bukanlah disebabkan karena amar putusannya yang tidak tepat, namun dikarenakan sumber logika yang digunakan adalah tidak tepat.The presence of the argumentum ad verecundiam fallacy in a court decision indicates erroneous legal reasoning, because the use of authority that cannot be justified based on the jurisprudence will affect the validity of the ruling, which is a conclusion of law, in that such ruling can be repealed. The repeal of the ruling is not because the ruling is incorrect, but because the source of the logic used is incorrect.
ADVOCATE IMMUNITY: QUO VADIS OF VALUE AND ETHICS IN LEGAL NORMS? Marbun, Rocky
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 8 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.8.1.2019.123-148

Abstract

If the value in the ethics of a particular profession is attributed to the property of that particular profession, then the judgment of a 'good faith' offense can only be traced through a mutual consensus agreed upon by those in the profession. However, in this case, the Researcher is not in a position to say an Advocate can not be convicted. The researcher is more respectful of the value that should be heard and raised surface on the hegemony of legal norms.
Co-Authors Armilius, nfn Armilius, nfn M. Iman Santoso Mahmud Mulyadi Walim, Walim Waty Suwarty Haryono