Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.394
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal KALAM Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Badamai Law Journal Unes Law Review Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum ADIL : Jurnal Hukum Cakrawala Repositori Imwi Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science Jurnal Konstitusi Yuridika Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan
Ratih Lestarini
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 19 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Juridical Analysis of Constitutional Court Decisions Regarding Tax Collection against Taxpayers Who Are Declared Bankrupt: Case Study of Constitutional Court Decision Number 41/PUU-XVIII/2020 Mochamad Amaludin; Ratih Lestarini; Tjip Ismail
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 5, No 2 (2022): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute May
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v5i2.5595

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implications of the Constitutional Court's decision on state rights in the context of tax collection, tax law enforcement efforts and fair legal protection and certainty for all parties interacting with legal entities. This study indicates that the state's right to collect taxes is a valid authority not only because it is lawful utilizing normative legal research and a legal approach as normative juridical research that directs research on secondary material such as books, positive legislation, and written norms. Article 23A of the 1945 United States Constitution states that it is constitutionally anchored on the Constitution. This analysis also demonstrates that the arrangements outlined in Article 2 paragraph 6 and Article 32 paragraph 2 of the KUP Law, which are subject to material review, are extremely important and helpful for preserving legal certainty and justice in tax payments.
Co-Authors Abdurrahman Al-Fatih Ifdal Abdurrahman Al-Fatih Ifdal Abdurrahman Al-Fatih Ifdal Anugroho, Adhi bashel, abdul halim Erni HERAWATI Hadid Sukmana Herdis Herdiansyah Hudson Markiano Hutapea Mochamad Amaludin Rahmad HENDRA Ratuanak, Andreas M.D. Rosa Agustina Sukmana, Hadid Sukmana, Hadid Suparjo SUPARJO TJIP ISMAIL Tri Hayati Tumpal SIMANJUNTAK Yulistyaputri, Rizkisyabana