Raisya Aurellia Putri LESMANA
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Validity comparison of CAT (caries risk assessment tool) and CAMBRA (caries management by risk assessment) on children: a rapid review Raisya Aurellia Putri LESMANA; Anne Agustina SUWARGIANI; Meirina GARTIKA
Journal of Syiah Kuala Dentistry Society Vol 7, No 1 (2022): Juni 2022
Publisher : Dentistry Faculty

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jds.v7i1.27256

Abstract

Caries Risk Assessment (CRA) focuses on caries prevention than restorative approaches. CariesManagement by Risk Assessment (CAMBRA) and Caries Risk Assessment Tool (CAT) are examples of manualcharting CRA methods that were made to make it easier for clinicians and non-clinicians. This study aims tocompare the validity of CAMBRA and CAT as CRA for children. This study is a rapid review and uses articles asresearch samples. Systematic searching was carried out using the PRISMA diagram. This study uses PubMed andScience Direct databases. This study includes randomized controlled, cohort, and methodological studies reportingthe validity of CAT and CAMBRA methods on children published from 2011-2021. Searching strategy for this studyis (children) AND (dental caries) AND (risk assessment) AND ((CAT) OR (CAMBRA) OR (AAPD)) AND (validity).Articles that meet the inclusion criteria will be extracted and discussed. One hundred three articles were identified,and only five articles met the inclusion criteria. Modified CAT by adding the patient's Streptococcus mutansexamination without asking the patient's social-economic status has the highest validity value. The method with thelowest validity value in this study is the unmodified CAT method. Both CAMBRA and CAT validity are stilllimited. The evidence is still low. CAT has high sensitivity score but a low specificity value, while the CAMBRAmethod has a different validity value for each reported article.KEYWORDS: Caries risk assessment, children, Caries Management by Risk Assessment (CAMBRA), Caries RiskAssessment Tool (CAT), validity
ENDODONTIC TREATMENT ON FRACTURED MANDIBULAR ANTERIOR TOOTH WITH CROWN DOWN TECHNIQUE Raisya Aurellia Putri Lesmana; Fajar Fatriadi
Dentino: Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Vol 9, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : FKG ULM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20527/dentino.v9i1.18872

Abstract

Background: Trauma involving the dento-alveolar area often occurs and tends to cause tooth fractures. Fractured teeth can be at risk of infection which can lead to pain and tooth necrosis. In necrotic tooth cases, root canal treatment is one of the most common procedures to be performed to preserve the tooth. Case: A 36-year-old female patient came to RSGM Unpad with chief complaint of a broken mandibular anterior tooth. This complaint occurred 3 months ago. The patient did not complain of any pain. Previously, the tooth that the patient complained about had been restored but fell out again a month ago. History of systemic disease, family disease, and allergies was denied. Patients want their complaints to be resolved. Case Management: The treatment carried out in this case is root canal treatment. Root canal treatment consists of three main stages, namely biomechanical preparation of the root canal, root sterilization with calcium hydroxide, and obturation. The preparation technique used is crown down. The main aim of the crown down root canal preparation technique is to minimize or eliminate the amount of extruded necrotic tissue towards the apical foramen during preparation. Conclusion: Establishing a good diagnosis, as well as the use of good instrumentation in root canal treatment with a crown down preparation technique followed by single cone obturation can be an option for treating crown fracture teeth. Further follow-up is required in this case.   Keywords: crown down, fracture, nonvital, root canal treatment