Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.953
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam Al-'Adalah Al-Banjari : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Al Ahkam Jurnal Penelitian Keislaman Al Hurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam Takwil: Journal of Quran and Hadith Studies Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu Al-Insaf - Jurnal Ahwal Al Syakhshiyyah
Abdul Hakim
STAI Imam Syafi'i Cianjur
Religion Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
DINAMIKA METODOLOGI USHUL FIKIH: ANALISIS KRITIS TERHADAP ALIRAN FUQAHĀ’, MUTAKALLIMĪN, DAN ṬARĪQAT AL-JAM‘ Abdul Hakim
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): April : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu (JIMI)
Publisher : CV. Denasya Smart Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69714/5tegwd44

Abstract

In the early period of Islam, uṣūl al-fiqh did not exist as a formally codified discipline, as the Companions and the Successors possessed strong linguistic competence and direct proximity to the sources of revelation, enabling them to intuitively comprehend principles of legal inference (istinbāṭ). However, with the expansion of the Islamic world, the gradual decline in Arabic linguistic proficiency, and the increasing complexity of ḥadīth transmission, the codification of uṣūl al-fiqh methodology became inevitable. This study aims to critically analyze the historical development of uṣūl al-fiqh methodology from the formative period to the emergence of three major methodological trends, namely Ṭarīqat al-Mutakallimīn, Ṭarīqat al-Fuqahā’, and Ṭarīqat al-Mutaʾakhkhirīn, as well as to examine the implications of these methodological differences for Islamic legal formulation. Employing a qualitative-descriptive approach with a historical-normative orientation, this research relies on library-based analysis of primary and secondary uṣūl al-fiqh sources, utilizing comparative and content analysis methods. The findings indicate that differing epistemological orientations among these methodological trends significantly influence approaches to textual evidence, hierarchies of legal reasoning, and interpretations of fundamental legal concepts such as ṣiḥḥah (validity), ijzā’ (sufficiency), and qaḍā’ (make-up obligation). This study affirms that uṣūl al-fiqh is not merely an abstract theoretical construct but a dynamic methodological framework that sustains the continuity and relevance of Islamic law in response to changing historical contexts.
Co-Authors Ali Alkosibati Ali Alkosibati Bagus Haziratul Qodsiyah Oka Putra Pratama Qodsiyah, Bagus Haziratul