Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.5
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Akta Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Unes Law Review JURNAL HUKUM dan KENOTARIATAN Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW LEGAL BRIEF UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Indonesian Notary Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Ridwan, Fully Handayani
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Akta

 1 
Application of the Bona Fide Principle in the Implementation of the Binding Sale and Purchase Agreement Related to the Seller’s Absence Before the Notary-PPAT Adistia, Meisya; Ridwan, Fully Handayani
JURNAL AKTA Vol 12, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v12i4.48899

Abstract

The Sale and Purchase Agreement (in Indonesian Version: Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB)) is a crucial foundation before the formation of the Akta Jual Beli (AJB). However, in practice, serious obstacles often arise when the seller is unable to be present before the Notary-PPAT. This phenomenon not only hinders administrative processes but also potentially undermines the validity of the deed, increases the risk of breach of contract, and weakens the legal protection that the buyer should receive. In this complex situation, the principle of bona fide (itikad baik) becomes a fundamental pillar that demands honesty, transparency, and compliance with legal obligations from all parties involved. This study uses a doctrinal method to analyze legislation, legal doctrines, and evaluate how court decisions (case studies of Decision Number 28/Pdt/2022/PT SMG, Decision Number 20/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Tgt, and Decision Number 36/PDT/2020/PT.Smg) refer to the principle of bona fide in cases of seller absence in PPJB, and to what extent these decisions can serve as a basis or consideration in choosing dispute resolution mechanisms (litigation, mediation, or arbitration). In-depth analysis shows that judicial bodies consistently emphasize the importance of the principle of bona fide and deed formality. The main results of the analysis indicate that these decisions, by reinforcing the validity of the deed or highlighting violations of good faith, implicitly and explicitly encourage the parties to consider alternative dispute resolution methods such as mediation or arbitration as faster, more efficient efforts that potentially maintain good relations, while striving to reach agreements reflecting the principle of bona fide for legal certainty.
Co-Authors Adistia, Meisya Adzalia Grimaldi Indra Agnefia Elisia Sahertian Ali Hadi Shahab Alisha Nur Laili Andika Prayoga Apriliani, Karen Arlina, Nur izkha Armitha Viradilla Benny Djaja Chandra, Sherly Angelina Desela Sahra Annisa Rangkuti Desiani, Juni Dipo Hekmatiar, Muhammad Eriyanti, Devi Fadhila Rizqi Faradilla Asyatama I Made Hery Karyadika Jim Jeffrey Prajogo Kurnia Oetama Noviansyah Kurniawan Marlyna, Henny May Kurniawan Sanjaya Nadya Fitri Utami Patricia Jessica Permana, Muhammad Fatha Putri Ridzka Maheswari Djasmine Ray Irawan Al-Madrusi Sherly Angelina Chandra Suci, Oktaviani Nurul William Tanuwijaya Yuwono Prianto