Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

IDENTIFIKASI MODEL GAYA BELAJAR DUNN AND DUNN’S MATERI DIAGNOSA ORGANISASI PADA PESERTA PELATIHAN KEPEMIMPINAN PENGAWAS DI PUSLATBANG KDOD Muhamad Harry Rahmadi
Jurnal Kewidyaiswaraan Vol 6 No 1 (2021): Jurnal Kewidyaiswaraan
Publisher : Pusat Pembinaan Jabatan Fungsional Bidang Pengembangan Kompetensi Pegawai ASN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (11103.007 KB)

Abstract

The importance of a knowledge of the participants' understanding of learning through their learning styles, will make it easier for a instructor to manage to learn. The research objective was to determine the tendency of learning style models possessed by the participants of the Supervisory Leadership Training from Dunn and Dunn’s learning style model concept, to basis for the delivery learning for Organizational Diagnostics lessons, at the KDOD Puslatbang, National Institute of Public Administration. This research is a descriptive study with a survey method in finding research data, with different data collection techniques, namely face-to-face and digital, because of the Covid-19 pandemic phenomenon. The results obtained are the learning tendency of Dunn and Dunn’s learning style model, namely the emotional learning stimulation dimension of 22% in Supervisory Leadership Training batch I, while Supervisory Leadership Training batch II of 35% and batch III of 40% is the environment, while the elements of the learning stimulus dimension from Supervisory Leadership Training batches I, II and III, there are differentiating findings, namely elements of temperature and auditory learning methods, in Supervisory Leadership Training batch I is to learn with normal temperatures and high auditory learning methods, while Supervisory Leadership Training batches II and III learn with cold temperatures and with high auditory way of learning. The difference in the implementation of the execution is the effect of the learning style model of the participant, so the need for coordination between instructor and organizers to recognize participants effectively.
Effect Of Placement And Operational Standards Procedures Regarding The Performance Of Employees Of The Office Of The Regional Representative Council Of Samarinda City Askiah, Askiah; Anisa Maqwani Retalita Putri Periadi; Joko Sabtohadi; Muhamad Harry Rahmadi
Jurnal Multidisiplin Sahombu Vol. 4 No. 01 (2024): Jurnal Multidisiplin Sahombu, 2024
Publisher : Sean Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Data held by the Secretariat of the Samarinda City Regional People's Representative Council shows that employee placement is inconsistent with educational level, workload analysis and position analysis, as well as standard operating procedures. Several changes to the organizational structure will of course also have an impact on changes to standard operating procedures. The aim of the research is to determine the effect of placement, standard operating procedures. The research method used was field research using a quantitative approach with 41 respondents, then data analysis using the SPSS 25 application. The results of the research on the placement variable obtained a t table value of 2.023, t count > t table (6.112 > 2.023), meaning that the placement variable had a significant positive influence on employee performance. The test results for the standard operational procedure variable obtained a t table value of 2.023, t count > t table (5.940 > 2.023), meaning that the standard operational procedure variable has a significant positive effect on employee performance. Then, simultaneous placement and standard operating procedures do not have a significant effect on employee performance. From the partial test results, the placement variable is the dominant variable compared to the standard operational procedure variable on employee performance. Furthermore, the R2 coefficient of determination value of 97.1% means that employee performance is influenced by placement and standard operating procedures, while the remaining 2.9% is the influence of other variables not examined in this research.