Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Penyelesaian Sengketa Ganti Rugi Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum Aris Syahputra Situmorang; Meysita Arum Nugroho
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Desember 2022
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

AbstrakPengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum harus dilaksanakan berdasarkan asas kemanusiaan, kemanfaatan, kepastian, keterbukaan, kesepakatan, keikutsertaan, kesejahteraan, berkelanjutan dan keselarasan. Dengan diterapkan asas ini pada pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah maka dapat meminimalisir terjadinya konflik dalam pengadaan tanah. Pemberian ganti rugi terhadap pemegang hak atas tanah bersifat layak dan adil, layak dari segi jumlah dan layak dari segi cara pemberiannya sehingga pemegang hak atas tanah tidak merasa dipaksakan melepaskan tanahnya untuk digunakan bagi kepentingan pembangunan berdasarkan prinsip penghormatan terhadap hak pemegang atas tanah. Musyawarah dalam pengadaan tanah dilakukan semaksimal mungkin dan tetap dalam posisi netral dan tetap dalam posisi sejajar dan tidak ada pihak yang merasa ditekan atau dipaksakan, prinsip penghormatan terhadap pemegang hak atas tanah tertuang dalam undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 dengan memberikan perlindungan hukum dan dalam pemberian ganti kerugian tidak menyebabkan pemegang hak atas tanah tidak lebih buruk keadaannya dibandingkan dengan sebelum pelepasan hak atas tanah.Kata Kunci: Ganti Rugi, Pengadaan Tanah, Kepentingan UmumÂ AbstractLand procurement for development in the public interest must be carried out based on the principles of humanity, benefit, certainty, openness, agreement, participation, welfare, sustainability and harmony. By applying this principle to the implementation of land acquisition, it can minimize conflicts in land acquisition. The provision of compensation to the holder of land rights is appropriate and fair, appropriate in terms of quantity and appropriate in terms of the method of giving it so that the holder of land rights does not feel compelled to release their land to be used for development purposes based on the principle of respect for the rights of the holder to the land. Deliberations in land acquisition are carried out as much as possible and remain in a neutral position and remain in an equal position and no party feels pressured or forced, the principle of respect for land rights holders is contained in Law Number 2 of 2012 by providing legal protection and in granting compensation does not cause the holder of land rights to be in no worse condition than before the relinquishment of land rights.Keywords: Compensation, Land Acquisition, Public Interest

Akibat Hukum Perceraian Terhadap Hak Asuh Anak yang Disebabkan Salah Satu Pasangan Suami Istri Berpindah Agama Meysita Arum Nugroho
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Desember 2022
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

AbstrakPerkawinan yang sah adalah perkawinan yang dimata hukum tercatat di Kantor Urusan Agama (KUA). Dalam tulisan ini permasalahan yang di angkat ialah Bagaimana kedudukan hukum hak asuh atas anak pasca perceraian Menurut Hukum Positif dalam Putusan No.0914/pdt.G/2014/PA.Jkt.Sel. Dan Siapakah yang diberikan wewenang melakukan hak asuh anak pasca perceraian. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut digunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Bahwa kedudukan hukum anak pasca perceraian akibat perbedaan agama menurut hukum positif di Indonesia. Status anak itu dapat dibedakan menjadi tiga golongan, yaitu: Pertama, Anak yang dilahirkan sewaktu Islam, anak ini adalah anak muslim, menurut kesepakatan para fuqaha; Kedua, Anak yang dikandung sewaktu Islam dan dilahirkan setelah murtad, maka hukumnya adalah sama dengan anak yang dilahirkan sewaktu Islam. Ketiga, Anak yang dikandung dan dilahirkan setelah murtad, maka anak itu hukumnya kafir karena dia dilahirkan diantara kedua orang tuanya yang kafir, tidak ada pendapat lain dalam masalah ini. Adapun wewenang hak asuh anak jatuh kepada ibunya, karena di dalam kasus ini anak tersebut belum dewasa/ belum mmayiz. Namun beda hal jika ibu nya murtad, maka tidak berhak atas hak asuh anak tersebut.Kata Kunci: Perceraian, Kedudukan Hukum, Hak Asuh AnakÂ AbstractLegitimate marriages are marriages that are legally registered at the Office of Religious Affairs (KUA). In this paper the problem raised is how the legal position of custody of children after divorce according to Positive Law in Decision No. 0914 / pdt.G / 2014 / PA.Jkt.Sel. And who is given the authority to do child custody after divorce. To answer these problems normative legal research methods are used. That the legal position of children after divorce is due to religious differences according to positive law in Indonesia. The status of the child can be divided into three groups, namely: First, Children born during Islam, these children are Muslim children, according to the agreement of the fuqaha; Second, children who were conceived during Islam and were born after apostasy, then the law is the same as children born during Islam. Third, the child conceived and born after apostasy, then the child is a pagan law because he was born between his pagan parents, there is no other opinion in this matter. The authority for child custody goes to the mother, because in this case the child is not yet an adult/not yet mmayiz. But different things if the mother is apostate, then not entitled to custody of the child.Keywords: Divorce, Legal Position, Child Custody

Analysis Of The Effectiveness Of The Self Assimilation Program During The Covid-19 Pandemic (Review Of Permenkumham Number 43 Year 2021) Denna Destian Prakasa Wibowo; Meysita Arum Nugroho
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 3 (2022): August: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

The determination of the Public Health Emergency and the Covid-19 Pandemic Outbreak as a national disaster by the Government has an impact on other policies from the government that must be issued in order to maintain national stability. One of them is the Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 10 of 2020 which regulates the independent assimilation policy for prisoners on the grounds of overcapacity in prisons and is also expected to be an alternative to minimize the spread of Covid-19. The Permenkumham was even extended for two amendments, namely Permenkumham No.32 of 2020 and Permenkumham No.43 of 2021. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the assimilation program in several Indonesian prisons based onPermenkumham stipulated.This research is a normative legal research with a sociological juridical approach related to actual problems related to the Effectiveness of the Independent Assimilation Program in the Covid-19 Pandemic Period. Some of the conclusions reached include: 1) Permenkumham No. 43 of 2021 does not provide assimilation rights to prisoners of terrorism, narcotics, corruptors, other serious crimes, and prisoners who repeat a crime; 2) that the implementationindependent assimilation program in the midst of prison overcapacity is only a temporary solution, alternative non-prison punishment such as supervision and community service is seen as more efficient than prison law because it can achieve the goal of coaching; 3)Some of the obstacles in implementing the assimilation program during the COVID-19 pandemic, namely the negative public view of ex-convicts, Pokmas support that has not been maximized, and not all prisoners have a clear family background.

Legal Consequences of the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18/Puuxvii/2029 on the Executional Power of the Notary Fiduciary Guarantee Deed Ahmad Ardiansyah; Meysita Arum Nugroho
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 8 No 2 (2022): Oktober
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v8i2.3028

According to the provisions of Article 30 of the UUJF, it is stated that the Fiduciary Giver is obliged to submit the object that is the object of the Fiduciary Guarantee in the context of carrying out the execution of the Fiduciary Guarantee. However, the execution must follow the procedure for implementing a court decision. This means that in accordance with Article 196 paragraph (3) of the HIR (Herzien Indonesia Regulation) the creditor must submit an application to the Head of the District Court to carry out the execution of the collateral object based on the executorial title of the Fiduciary Guarantee Certificate. The formulation of the problem in this research is the legal consequences of the decision of the constitutional court number 18/puuxvii/2029 on the executive power of a notary fiduciary guarantee deed? The type of research used is normative with a statutory approach and a decision study approach as well as a conceptual approach. The result of the research is that there is a Constitutional Court Decision, so the execution of fiduciary guarantees must follow the procedure for implementing a court decision. This means that in accordance with Article 196 paragraph (3) of the HIR (Herzien Indonesia Regulation), the creditor must submit an application to the Head of the District Court so that the execution of the collateral object is carried out based on the executorial title of the Fiduciary Guarantee Certificate. Fiduciary is the transfer of ownership rights to an object based on mutual trust based on the stipulation that the object whose ownership rights are transferred remains with the power that owns the object, as stated in Article 1 point 1 UUJF.

Reconstruction of Shared Assets Due to Divorce Based on Pancasila Justice Mustofa Aditama; Meysita Arum Nugroho
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 8 No 2 (2022): Oktober
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v8i2.3032

The implementation of the distribution of joint property due to divorce is currently not fair, meaning that the construction of the distribution of joint property due to divorce is currently given by the Marriage Law no. 1 of 1974, the Compilation of Islamic Law still does not fulfill the sense of justice. This study aims to determine, find and analyze how the reconstruction of the distribution of joint property due to divorce based on the value of Pancasila justice. The results of the study on the reconstruction of the legal value of the distribution of joint property due to divorce were carried out in a casuistic manner based on their contribution by taking into account the benefits and disadvantages. The reconstruction of the value of justice as a result of divorce based on the orientation of the distribution is solely for the benefit, benefit and benefit of the person concerned, on the contrary, certain situations and conditions that can harm the interests and welfare of one party must be avoided.

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 5 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search