Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.009
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum Jurnal Hukum Prioris Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Amicus Curiae
Yogo Pamungkas
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
PENOLAKAN PENERBITAN KEPUTUSAN OLEH LURAH KEPUTIH BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 2014 TENTANGADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN (STUDI PUTUSAN PTUN SURABAYA NO.19/P/FP/2019/PTUN.SBY.): The Refusal to Issue a Decision by The Head of Keputih Village Based on Law Number 30 of 2014 Concerning Government Administration (Case Study of The Surabaya Administrative Court Decision NO.19/P/FP/2019/PTUN.SBY.) Axel Matthew Lambert Setyoadi; Yogo Pamungkas
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24695

Abstract

This study reviews the refusal to issue a decision by the Lurah Keputih based on Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration (Case Study of Surabaya Administrative Court Decision No. 19/P/FP/2019/PTUN.SBY). The main issue discussed in this study is whether the actions of Lurah Keputih in not issuing the requested certificate contradict Law No. 30 concerning Government Administration. To answer this issue, the research employs a juridical-normative method with a descriptive nature, using secondary data as the primary data processed qualitatively. Conclusions are drawn using deductive logic. This study concludes that the actions of the Government Official in not issuing the requested certificate without a reason that meets the requirements are contrary to Law No. 30 concerning Government Administration. The legal consequence of this act is that it constitutes a positive fictitious action due to the neglect in issuing a decision, and the concerned Government Official is subject to administrative sanctions such as paying court costs and issuing what was requested by the Applicant.
PERMASALAHAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERKAIT LEGAL STANDING PEMOHON BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 90/PUU-XXI/2023: Issues Considered by Constitutional Court Judges Regarding the Petitioner's Legal Standing Based on Decision Number 90/PUU- XXI/2023 Rayhan Putra Sena; Yogo Pamungkas
Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Hukum Prioris Volume 12 Nomor 2 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Trisakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/prio.v12i2.24910

Abstract

In submitting a request for judicial review, the applicant must explain the reasons for the applicant's request to litigate at the Constitutional Court. This is to determine whether the applicant has legal standing in a lawsuit at the Constitutional Court. In this research, the object of research is the Constitutional Court decision number 90/PUU-XXI/2023. In this decision the applicant felt disadvantaged by the enactment of Article 169 letter q of the General Election Law. And the judge's considerations in accepting the applicant's legal position are discussed in this research. So the formulation of the problem that will be discussed is whether the judge's considerations regarding the applicant's legal standing are in accordance with statutory regulations. This research uses an exploratory type of normative research using secondary data which is analyzed qualitatively by drawing conclusions using a deductive method. The conclusion of this research is that the Constitutional Court should not grant Legal Standing to the applicant to litigate because the applicant does not have urgent interests and does not feel any real loss. This is supported by dissenting opinions from several Constitutional Justices such as Saldi Isra, Suhartoyo, and Wahiduddin Adams as well as statutory regulations that regulate this matter.
Co-Authors Alvira Zahra Hartono Arini Pertiwi Arya Falah Al Multazam Axel Matthew Lambert Setyoadi Dewi Aisyah Ghaly Odeliatama Sinulingga Hamdy Mubarok Hartono, Alvirazahra Indra Permana Janwardisan Hernandika Khairunnisa Dini Avianti Muhammad Faris Hilmy Muhammad Syukur Fezadi Iskandar Navyla Arjinia Putri Widjanarko Nina Stevany Malipolla Nur Azizah Ayu Salsabilla Putri Qurrota'aini Rana Sayyidah Nabilah Rayhan Putra Sena Renaldhy Ildha Subagja Syahdan Sabillah Zahra Putri Ariana