Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2020 - 2025

4.392

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal Ensiklopedia Social Review Interdisciplinary Social Studies Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum Reformasi Hukum Trisakti INJURITY: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Amicus Curiae

Vientje Ratna Multiwijaya

Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia

Author-ID : 5429775

Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 35 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

1 2 3 4

PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP ANAK SEBAGAI KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA PEDOFILIA Vientje Ratna Multiwijaya
Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

ABSTRAKPengabdian kepada masyarakat mengenai perlindungan terhadap anak korban tindak pidana pedofilia menitikberatkan kepada perlindungan hukum bagi korban pedophilia dari sudut hukum perlindungan anak. Khususnya pengabdian masyarakat ini memberikan pemahaman macam-macan kekerasan seksual/pedofilia yang dapat memberikan dampak anak menjadi malu, rendah diri, mengalami luka fisik, kerusakan alat reproduksi bahkan akibat tersebut bisa membekas hingga anak dewasa dan juga memberikan pengetahuan tentang adanya sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku pedopilia. Pengabdian masyarakat di RPTRA Kedoya Utara, Kecamatan Kebun Jeruk Jakarta Barat pada Senin, 12 November 2018 dalam bentuk penyuluhan dan posbakum dilakukan dengan cara memberikan ceramah, disertai contoh-contoh kasus yang aktual dan sering terjadi dalam masyarakat. Kepada peserta penyuluhan diberi kesempatan untuk melakukan tanya jawab yang berkaitan dengan hukum perlindungan anak atau hal lain yang berhubungan dengan hukum. Dengan demikian tujuan pengabdian masyarakat dapat tercapai yaitu masyarakat memahami serta memiliki pengetahuan tentang perlindungan anak, masalah pedophilia, muatan yang dilarang dan sanksi pidana pelaku pedopilia. Kata kunci: Anak, Korban Tindak Pidana Pedopilia dan Hukum Perlindungan Anak

PERBANDINGAN HUKUM NEGARA INDONESIA DAN NEGARA INGGRIS MENGENAI PERKOSAAN DI BAWAH UMUR Khrisdianto Risyad; Vientje Ratna Multiwijaya
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Given that children will be the nation's future leaders and heirs, child protection is implemented with this understanding in mind. The prevalence of sexual predators is rising, starting with the lower middle class and moving up to the upper middle class. Law Number 35 of 2014 gives Indonesia the tools to protect children, but is this sufficient? The UK has general provisions in the Penal Code up to provisions in The Sexual Offenses Act 2003 for the protection of children with sexually vulnerable characteristics. Problem formulation; comparing and contrasting the components of underage rape using research techniques from literature research; the type of study employed is normative juridical; with the nature of the research, which involves applying deductive reasoning to generate conclusions from descriptive analytical, primary data, and qualitative data analysis methodologies. In terms of the research's findings, analysis, and conclusion, there are four areas of similarity and ten points of difference, one of which is the absence of a law on sexual violence in Indonesia, which would serve as a vehicle for the nation's future generations' protection.

TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN FISIK MENGAKIBATKAN KEMATIAN DALAM LINGKUP RUMAH TANGGA (PUTUSAN NO.27/PID.B/2021/PN.TRT) Nurul 'Arifah Dharmaningtyas; Vientje Ratna Multiwijaya
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Criminal acts regarding a violence or abuse in a household matters are included in 2 (two) laws, which is the Criminal Code which has a public characteristic and Law number 23 of 2004 that has a specific characteristic. The main research’s problem are: whether the Defendant's actions is in accordance with Article 354 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 356 1 of the Criminal Code (Decision Number 27/Pid.B/2021/PN.Trt) and the punishment of the perpetrators of physical violence that resulting in death within the household (Decision Number 27/Pid.B/2021/PN.Trt). The research conducted in normative and descriptive analytical legal research, using secondary data obtain through library research. The data is analyzed qualitatively and the conclusions are drawn using deductive method. The actions of the perpetrator in this case constituted an act of physical violence resulting in death within the household that is in accordance with Article 44 paragraph (3) of Law no. 23 of 2004. The sentencing of the perpetrators is in accordance with sentencing theories.

ANAK PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERSETUBUHAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN ANAK (PUTUSAN No.7/PID.SUS-ANAK/2020/PN.MBN) Nurul Kamila; Vientje Ratna Multiwijaya
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

The crime of child sexual intercourse and abuse is regulated specifically in Law number 35 of 2014 Article 76D concerning Child Protection. It explains that each individual is not justified in committing violence or sending threats of violence and forcing child to have sex with him or with another individual. The research’s problems: is the action of a child who commits crime of intercourse are in accordance with Article 81 (2) of Law number 17 of 2016 concerning Child Protection (Decision No.7/Pid.Sus- Anak/2020/PN.Mbn) and whether the prison sentence imposed on perpetrator meets sentencing requirements in Law number 11 of 2012 concerning Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The research object is decision number 7/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.Mbn and the research is a normative and descriptive analytical legal research, using secondary data obtain through library research, analyzed qualitatively and conclusions are drawn using inductive method. The research’s conclusions: The actions of child perpetrators in the crime of intercourse are inappropriate if they only use Article 81 (2), but must also be based on Article 81 (1) of Law number 17 of 2016 concerning Child Protection, Punishment of the Child Defendant is in accordance with Law number 11 of 2012 but should not be given additional punishment.

TINJAUAN YURIDIS ANAK KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA PERSETUBUHAN OLEH ORANG TUA (PUTUSAN NO.223/PID.SUS/2020/PN.PTI) Regina Natasya; Vientje Ratna Multiwijaya
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

One of the duties of parents is to protect their children. The state has assured that children's rights are protected under Law Number 17 of 2016. Problem formulation: Based on the analysis of Decision No. 223/Pid.Sus/2020/PN. Pti, is the suspect's behavior in accordance with Article 81 Paragraph 2 of Law Number 35 of 2014 addressing child protection? and what actions should be taken against parents that coerce their children into having sex (Study of Decision Number 223/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Pti). Normative legal research technique using secondary data from library research and analytical descriptive nature. Qualitative data processing and deductive reasoning are used to reach conclusions. According to the findings of the study, the discussion, and the conclusion that the defendant's actions are improper under Article 81 Paragraph 2 of Law Number 35 of 2014 in conjunction with Law Number 17 year 2016, preferably using Article 81 Paragraph 3, the sentence imposed by law enforcement is made heavier by one-third of the criminal threat made in the study.

TINJAUAN YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENGEROYOKAN SECARA BERSAMA YANG MENGAKIBATKAN LUKA Chantiqa Dwi Ayudhia Chaerunnisa; Vientje Ratna Multiwijaya
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

The defendant in the persecution case named Yayan Sopian bin Tardi has been sentenced proven and convincingly guilty of committing the crime of persecution as stipulated in Article 351 of Criminal Code. Through a brief research by the researcher, there are circumstances and a chronology of events which constitute the crime of beating up which resulted in injuries as stipulated in Article 170 Paragraph (2) 1st of Criminal Code. The formulation of the problems in this research are whether the defendant's actions were in accordance with Article 351 of the Criminal Code (Study of Decision Number 541/Pid.B/2020/PN Bdg) or not and what is the Judge’s Consideration in the Decision Number 541/Pid.B/2020/PN Bdg. This research is a normative and descriptive analytical legal research that use secondary data consisting of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials obtained from literature studies, analyzed qualitatively and the conclusions are drawn by using deductive logic methods. The conclusions from the research are 1) The defendant's actions were not in accordance with Article 351 Paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 55 of the Criminal Code. 2) The considerations used in Decision Number 541/Pid.B/2020/PN Bdg are only based on artistic approach or intuition and wisdom.

TINDAK PIDANA DENGAN SENGAJA DAN DIRENCANAKAN LEBIH DAHULU MENGHILANGKAN NYAWA ORANG LAIN Muhammad Ilhamsyah Putra; Vientje Ratna Multiwijaya
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i3.16432

Humica Tambunan, the defendant, and Muhammad Iqbal, the victim, committed the premeditated murder offense. After becoming enraged with the victim for using his money, the defendant hit him in the back of the head with a piece of wood from his chamber. The victim was then crushed in the face by a mattress till he died. The issue is whether the defendant's intentional and premeditated killing of another person satisfies the requirements of Article 338 of the Criminal Code, and whether or not a 9-year prison sentence was properly imposed by the judge in light of this conviction. The normative research approach is descriptive, gathering evidence through literature analysis, and analyzing qualitatively by coming to deductive conclusions. Research findings and discussion; with the element of premeditation, a term of imprisonment for 20 years under Article 340 of the Criminal Code is more suitable because it was done on purpose and with advance planning. Conclusion of the study; 20-year prison sentence for the offender in violation of Article 340 of the Criminal Code.

PERBANDINGAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA PERKOSAAN BERDASARKAN PASAL 285 DAN 286 KUHP INDONESIA DENGAN ARTICLE 177 DAN 178 PENAL CODE OF JAPAN (ACT NO. 45 OF 1907): Comparison of Rape of ense Based on Article 285 and 286 of the Indonesia Penal Code with Article 177 and 178 of the Penal Code of Japan (Act No. 45 of 1907) Monica Dwi Anny Puspitasari; Vientje Ratna Multiwijaya
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19587

Comparative Criminal Law is a way to compare the similarities and dif erences based on the arrangements and elements of the crime of rape in both Indonesia and Japan. The main issues are (1) How is the regulation of the crime of rape according to Articles 285 and 286 of the Indonesian Criminal Code with Articles 177 and 178 of the Penal Code of Japan (Act No. 45 of 1907)? and (2) What are thesimilarities and dif erencesin the elements of the crime of rape according to Articles 285 and 286 of the IndonesianCriminal Code and Articles 177 and 178 of the Penal Code of Japan (Act No. 45 of 1907)?This study uses a comparative normative research method that is descriptive analysis in nature, using secondary data obtained from a literature study which is processed qualitatively with the conclusions that are (1) Regulations in Japan according to Articles 177 and 178 are only limited to crimes against decency, rape andbigamy while regulation in Indonesia is divided into attacking obscenity, and traf icking of women and children. (2) There are similarities in the two arrangements, namely that they are formal of enses, elements of violence and threats of violence, there are criminalthreats and both arrangements are forms of crime. Thedif erence can be seen from the legal system, subject and object of rape, criminal sanctions, duration of criminalsanctions, and limitations of objects of rape. The results of his research show that regulations in Indonesia are considered to be far more complete and extensive regarding crimes against decency and are not limited to certainmatters, and to be able to provide a deterrent ef ect on perpetrators of rape, attentioncan be paid to punishment based onthe Law on Sexual Violence

PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU PEMALSUAN SURAT DAN PENCURIAN KONTENER DENGAN PEMBERATAN DI JAKARTA UTARA: Criminal Accountability for Forger of Ketter and Container Theft With Weight in North Jakarta Pandya Dimas Prasetyo; Vientje Ratna Multiwijaya
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19589

The criminal responsibility of the perpetrators of the crime of theft which began with falsifying a letter resulted in a loss of Rp. 40,000,000.00 to the victim, but in fact the judge's decision was not satisfactory because it only used Article 363 paragraph 1 4 of the Criminal Code as illustrated in the Decision of the Central Jakarta District Court No. . 113/Pid.B/2022/PN Jkt Utr. The main issue raised is How is the criminal responsibility of the perpetrator, is it appropriate based on Article 363 paragraph 1 4 of the Criminal Code? and Is the perpetrator's actions included in the combination of criminal acts? This study uses a Normative Juridical research method which is Analytical Descriptive in nature by using Secondary Data obtained from literature studies which are then processed qualitatively. Deductive conclusions are in the form of (1) The perpetrator's liability is not appropriate if only using Article 363 paragraph 1 to 4 singly because it also fulfills the formulation of Article 263 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code and the perpetrator's actions are included in a combination of criminal acts, namely Continuing Actions resulting in inappropriate perpetrator accountability if only subject to Article 363 paragraph 1 to - 4, but he should also be subject to Article 263 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code concerning Forgery of Letters, besides that his actions are included in a combination of criminal acts, namely Vorgezette Handelling with sharpened punishment in order to achieve contemporary criminal purposes and goals 3R +1D.

SANKSI PIDANA PELAKU PENCABULAN TERHADAP ANAK YANG DILAKUKAN ANGGOTA KELUARGA (PUTUSAN NOMOR 1162/PID.B/2021/PN.BDG): Criminal Sanction for Child Abuse Performed by Family Members (Decision Number 1162/Pid.B/2021/PN.Bdg) Syilvia Widyastuti; Vientje Ratna Multiwijaya
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19599

The crime of child molestation is the act of someone who has a family relationship or the uncle of the victim's mother, by rubbing his genitals against the victim's vagina and rectum until sperm is released. As for Decision Number 1162/Pid.B/2021/PN.Bdg. The essence of the issues raised are, 1) Is the act of perpetrators of sexual abuse of children committed by family members appropriate or not based on Article 82 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 76E of Law Number 35 of 2014? 2) Is the criminal sanction of molestation of a child committed by a family member being terminated for 5 years, is it appropriate or not with the aim of punishment? This research uses normative research type and is analytical descriptive in nature, uses secondary data obtained through literature studies and is analyzed qualitatively by using deductive logical conclusions. The conclusions of this writing are, 1) The acts of perpetrators of molestation against children by family members are not appropriate based on Article 82 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 76E of Law Number 35 of 2014. The criminal sanction of molestation of children by family members is terminated for 5 years is not appropriate with the aim punishment. The research results of the perpetrators are related to the purpose of punishment, so the perpetrators should be subject to Article 82 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 76E of Law Number 17 of 2016.

Co-Authors Ahmad Muhajir Ahmad Muhajir, Ahmad Ali Syaifudin, Mohamad Chandra Dwijaya Sumule Chantiqa Dwi Ayudhia Chaerunnisa Daffa Fauzan Wanutama Dharmaningtyas, Nurul 'Arifah Hutabarat, Nivi Esther Fitriayu Khrisdianto Risyad Monica Dwi Anny Puspitasari Muhammad Ilhamsyah Putra Muhammad Ilhamsyah Putra Mychael Haris P Sidabutar Nurul 'Arifah Dharmaningtyas Nurul Kamila Pandya Dimas Prasetyo Prasetyo, Pandya Dimas Puspitasari, Monica Dwi Anny Putri Rizki Utami Rahul, Muhammad Regina Natasya Ridwan, Sabila Sabila Ridwan Santos, Ricardo Suar, Apriaman Sulaiman, Abdulah Sulaiman, Abdullah Sumule, Chandra Dwijaya Syilvia Widyastuti Tato, Susan Putri Simon Telaumbanua, Yoses Ondrasi Utami, Putri Rizki Warsito Warsito

Title

Found 35 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 35 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 35 Documents
Search