Reni Dwi Purnomowati
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia

Published : 29 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search
Journal : Amicus Curiae

PEMBERHENTIAN WALIKOTA YANG MELAKUKAN KASUS KORUPSI DAN WEWENANG PELAKSANA TUGAS WALIKOTA (STUDI DI KOTA BEKASI, JAWA BARAT): Discharge of the Mayor Who Commits Corruption Cases and the Authority of the Acting Mayor (Study in Bekasi City, West Java) Trisinta Nurul Fatimah; Reni Dwi Purnomowati
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19605

Abstract

The Mayor's position is a highly risky position in the event of a vacancy, so if there are violation issues that lead to a vacancy, temporary replacement must be carried out first. As happened in the city of Bekasi where the Mayor was involved in corruption and dismissed. The main issue is the mechanism for dismissing the Mayor of Bekasi who committed criminal acts according to Law No. 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government, and whether the Acting Mayor of Bekasi is in accordance with Law No. 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government in Indonesia. The research method used is normative descriptive research, based on secondary data, analyzed qualitatively, with deductive conclusions. The conclusion of this research is that every Regional Head can be terminated due to death, personal request, or dismissal, and the authority of the acting mayor in the implementation of regional government affairs is not yet clear and definitive, due to the authority in the law. Jabatan Walikota adalah posisi yang sangat beresiko apabila terjadi kekosongan, maka apabila terdapat permasalahan pelanggaran yang menyebabkan terjadinya kekosongan maka harus dilakukan penggantian sementara terlebih dahulu. Seperti yang terjadi di kota Bekasi dimana walikota melakukan korupsi dan diberhentikan. Pokok permasalahannya adalah bagaimana mekanisme pemberhentian walikota Bekasi yang melakukan tindak pidana menurut Undang-Undang No. 23 tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintah Daerah dan apakah Pelaksana Tugas Walikota Bekasi telah sesuai dengan Undang-Undang No.23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang dipergunakan adalah metode penelitian normatif yang bersifat deskriptif, dengan bersumber pada data sekunder, yang dianalisis secara kualitatif, dengan penarikan kesimpulan secara deduktif. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah setiap Kepala Daerah dapat diberhentikan karena alasan meninggal dunia, permintaan sendiri, atau diberhentikan serta peraturan keԝenangan pelaksana tugas walikota dalam penyelenggaraan urusan pemerintah daerah faktanya belum jelas dan tegas, karena keԝenangan dalam undang-undang
PEMBERHENTIAN WALIKOTA YANG MELAKUKAN KASUS KORUPSI DAN WEWENANG PELAKSANA TUGAS WALIKOTA (STUDI DI KOTA BEKASI, JAWA BARAT): Discharge of the Mayor Who Commits Corruption Cases and the Authority of the Acting Mayor (Study in Bekasi City, West Java) Fatimah, Trisinta Nurul; Purnomowati, Reni Dwi
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19605

Abstract

The Mayor's position is a highly risky position in the event of a vacancy, so if there are violation issues that lead to a vacancy, temporary replacement must be carried out first. As happened in the city of Bekasi where the Mayor was involved in corruption and dismissed. The main issue is the mechanism for dismissing the Mayor of Bekasi who committed criminal acts according to Law No. 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government, and whether the Acting Mayor of Bekasi is in accordance with Law No. 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government in Indonesia. The research method used is normative descriptive research, based on secondary data, analyzed qualitatively, with deductive conclusions. The conclusion of this research is that every Regional Head can be terminated due to death, personal request, or dismissal, and the authority of the acting mayor in the implementation of regional government affairs is not yet clear and definitive, due to the authority in the law. Jabatan Walikota adalah posisi yang sangat beresiko apabila terjadi kekosongan, maka apabila terdapat permasalahan pelanggaran yang menyebabkan terjadinya kekosongan maka harus dilakukan penggantian sementara terlebih dahulu. Seperti yang terjadi di kota Bekasi dimana walikota melakukan korupsi dan diberhentikan. Pokok permasalahannya adalah bagaimana mekanisme pemberhentian walikota Bekasi yang melakukan tindak pidana menurut Undang-Undang No. 23 tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintah Daerah dan apakah Pelaksana Tugas Walikota Bekasi telah sesuai dengan Undang-Undang No.23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang dipergunakan adalah metode penelitian normatif yang bersifat deskriptif, dengan bersumber pada data sekunder, yang dianalisis secara kualitatif, dengan penarikan kesimpulan secara deduktif. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah setiap Kepala Daerah dapat diberhentikan karena alasan meninggal dunia, permintaan sendiri, atau diberhentikan serta peraturan keԝenangan pelaksana tugas walikota dalam penyelenggaraan urusan pemerintah daerah faktanya belum jelas dan tegas, karena keԝenangan dalam undang-undang
PELAKSANAAN KEWENANGAN DPRD DALAM ANGGARAN BIDANG PENDIDIKAN DI DKI JAKARTA PERIODE 2022-2023 : Implementation of DPRD Authority in the Education Budget in DKI Jakarta for the 2022-2023 Period Pani, Nabilah Mutiara; Purnomowati, Reni Dwi
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19758

Abstract

One of the duties of the DKI Jakarta DPRD in preparing and stipulating the APBD in collaboration with the local government, in this case the Regional Head, is the budget function. Basically, the budget function plays an important role in funding all initiatives planned by the government aimed at improving the community's economy and realizing its welfare. The purpose of writing this thesis is to find out the mechanism for determining the education budget in the DKI Jakarta APBD and to find out the obstacles experienced by the DKI Jakarta Provincial DPRD in exercising the authority of the budget function in the field of education. Based on the results of the research, it is found that the organization of the education sector is an obligation of the local government. The implementation of the budget function until the 3rd quarter of the local government has run programs in education management and education support programs. Although, in its implementation there are still errors in distribution. The obstacles faced by the DKI Jakarta Provincial DPRD in carrying out its budget function authority include the Covid-19 pandemic factor, individual factors, political knowledge factors, DPRD members' knowledge of the budget, and the lack of complementary data in carrying out the budget function..
PEMBERHENTIAN WALIKOTA YANG MELAKUKAN KASUS KORUPSI DAN WEWENANG PELAKSANA TUGAS WALIKOTA (STUDI DI KOTA BEKASI, JAWA BARAT): Dismissal of Mayors who Commit Corruption Cases and the Authority of the Acting Mayor (Study in Bekasi City, West Java) Fahtimah, Trisinta Nurul; Purnomowati, Reni Dwi
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/2yv4m497

Abstract

The position of Mayor is a very risky position if there is a vacancy, so if there is an issue of offence thatcauses a vacancy, a temporary replacement must be made first. Similar to what happened in Bekasi City,when the mayor was fired for corruption. The subject matter is how the mechanism for dismissing themayor of Bekasi who committed a criminal offence according to Law No. 23 of 2014 concerningRegional Government and whether the Acting Mayor of Bekasi is in accordance with Law No.23 of 2014concerning Regional Government in Indonesia. This research approach is descriptive normative, basedon secondary data that is evaluated qualitatively using deductive inference. The conclusion of thisresearch is that the power of the acting mayor in carrying out regional government affairs is really notclear and firm because the authority based on the law is not clear and firm, and any Regional Head canbe dismissed due to death, own request, or dismissed.
KEWENANGAN KEPALA DAERAH DALAM MENYELENGGARAKAN PENDIDIKAN DASAR TAHUN 2022 MENURUT PERATURAN DAERAH KABUPATEN SEMARANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG PENYELENGGARAAN PENDIDIKAN: The Authority of The Regional Head in Organizing Basic Education In 2022, According to Regional Regulation of Semarang Regency Number 12 Of 2020 Concerning the Implementation of Education Fauzi, Surya Triputra; Purnomowati, Reni Dwi
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/vr5aqg05

Abstract

Regional heads are the most important element in management at the regional level, especially in the field of education administration. To measure the implementation of education, it is necessary to have a legal basis, including Law no. 17 of 2010. One of the educational management is implemented in the district area. Semarang with Semarang Regency Regulation no. 12 of 2020. However, the implementation of education management in the Regency area. Semarang still needs to be explored further. So, the author is interested in further research regarding education management with the problem formulation: What is the authority of the regional head of Semarang district in implementing education according to Semarang Regency Regional Regulation No. 12 of 2020 concerning the Implementation of Education and whether the regional head of Semarang Regency has implemented the implementation of Education in Basic Education in accordance with Semarang Regency Regional Regulation No. 12 of 2020 concerning the Implementation of Education. The results of this research state that the Semarang regent is still not implementing education management optimally so that there is still a shortage of students and adequate facilities, as experienced at SDN Ngajaran
KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH PROVINSI SEBAGAI BADAN PUBLIK DALAM MENYAJIKAN PENGELOLAAN APBD T.A. 2023 DI DKI JAKARTA: The Authority of the Provincial Government as a Public Entity in Presenting the Management of the 2023 Regional Budget in DKI Jakarta Nurhalisa, Siti; Purnomowati, Reni Dwi
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/v6211487

Abstract

Transparency in all sectors of government work programs is a very important element because it is directly related to public trust. In budget matters, where the main key must prioritize transparency, the focus of the government, in this case, the provincial government of DKI Jakarta as a Public Agency, is to present the management of the 2023 fiscal year budget (APBD) as public information. However, in reality, violations of transparency are still found within the DKI Jakarta provincial government agencies. This raises the question: what is the authority of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Government as a Public Agency in presenting the management of the 2023 fiscal year budget as public information? This research uses a normative type of study with secondary data. The nature of the research is descriptive, and conclusions are drawn deductively. From the research results, the form of authority of the DKI Jakarta provincial government in presenting the management of the 2023 fiscal year budget as public information is through a user-friendly application called the Smart Planning & Budgeting System (SPB). This platform contains information related to the budget in DKI Jakarta, allowing the public to directly participate in supervising the provincial government's budget management.
HUKUMAN DISIPLIN TERHADAP ASN YANG MELAKUKAN PENCALOAN CPNS MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NO.5 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG APARATUR SIPIL NEGARA (PUTUSAN NOMOR 4/G/2023/PT.TUN.JKT): Disciplinary Punishment on Civil Servants (ASN) Involved in CPNS Brokerage According to Law No. 5 of 2014 on State Civil Apparatus (A Decision Number 4/G/2023/PT.TUN.JKT) Irvandi Putra; Reni Dwi Purnomowati
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i2.22994

Abstract

Disciplinary Punishment for ASN Nomination for CPNS according to Law No. 5 of 2014 concerning the State Civil Apparatus. The identification of the problem in this article is whether the imposition of penalties on ASN who nominate for CPNS within the Ministry of Law and Human Rights is in accordance with Law Number 5 of 2014 concerning the State Civil Apparatus and what are the legal consequences of decision number 4/G/2023/PT. TUN. JKT on the ASN staffing. The type of research used is normative legal research based on descriptive secondary data and analyzed qualitatively with deductive conclusions. The results of the research and conclusion in this case, what happened to the plaintiff, namely LYZA ZASTAVARY, sued the chairman of BPASN and the Minister of Law and Human Rights for the imposition of disciplinary punishment in the form of disrespectful dismissal. In this case, the plaintiff is considered to have violated the obligations and prohibitions of civil servants by committing fraud, fraud, and embezzlement in the receipt of CPNS. Because he felt unfair, plaintiff filed a lawsuit on the grounds that the weight of the punishment was not proportional to the weight of the error in application of the phrase "brokerage".
KEWENANGAN KEPALA DESA DALAM PENYALURAN DAN PELAPORAN BANTUAN LANGSUNG TUNAI DI DESA JASINGA KABUPATEN BOGOR JAWA BARAT TAHUN 2022: Authority of Village Head in Distribution and Reporting of Direct Cash Assistance in Jasinga Village, Bogor Regency, West Java in 2022 Arie Pradana Putra; Reni Dwi Purnomowati
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i3.23996

Abstract

One of the social problems that Indonesia still faces is the high poverty rate. Various factors contribute to this condition, including the COVID-19 pandemic that occurred in 2020. The pandemic prompted the government to launch the Direct Cash Transfer (BLT) programme aimed at the rural poor. The distribution of BLT is a form of the government's social responsibility in an effort to restore the economic conditions of villagers. The identification of the problem in this article is about the authority of the village head in managing BLT in Jasinga Village, Bogor Regency in 2022. Based on the results of the research, it is concluded that the village has a strategic position in regulating and fulfilling the needs of its community. Then, based on the principles of diversity, participation, genuine autonomy, democracy, and community empowerment, the village has the authority to implement the programme.
INKONSISTENSI PENGATURAN KEWENANGAN JAKSA DALAM MELAKUKAN PENINJAUAN KEMBALI PADA UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2021 TENTANG KEJAKSAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA (STUDI PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 20/PUU-XXI/2023): Juridicial Review of Inconsistencies in The Regulation of The Prosecutor’s  Authority to Conduct Judicial Review in Law No. 11 of 2021 Concerning The Prosecutor’s Office of The Republic of Indonesia (Study of Constitutional Court Decision Number 20 / PUU-XXI / 2023) Revydo Daniel Pranoto; Reni Dwi Purnomowati
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24741

Abstract

Prosecutors have the legal authority to request a judicial review under Article 30C letter h of Law Number 11 of 2021, which pertains to the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. The prosecutor's submission of a judicial review has the capacity to create discord and uncertainty. The author will employ normative juridical research methodology for conducting this thesis research. The data utilized in this research consists of secondary data derived from primary, secondary, or tertiary legal materials. The result research and conclusion, according to Constitutional Court Decision No. 20/PUU-XXI/2023, the authority of the Prosecutor to perform a Judicial Review has been deemed unconstitutional. The decision affirms that the convicted individual or their successors possess the right to judicial review, whereas the prosecution lacks the power to initiate such a review. Under Law No. 11/2021 on the Prosecutor's Office, prosecutors are granted the authority to carry out judicial reviews.