Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Humaya: Jurnal Hukum, Humaniora, Masyarakat, dan Budaya Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Amicus Curiae
Prastopo
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
TANGGUNGJAWAB PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN DAN PENGGELAPAN (PUT. NO. 1103/PID.B/2021/PN.JKT.SEL): Criminal Responsibility Against the Persons of the Criminal Acts of Fraud and Embracement (Decision. NO. 1103/PID.B/2021/PN.JKT.SEL) Pratama, Alvinza Aditya; Prastopo
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19739

Abstract

one of the causes of criminal acts of fraud is that the perpetrator can convince the victim with his deceit and false prestige. the defendant deceived the victim by pretending to be a State Civil Apparatus (ASN) and used the victim to commit his crime by committing fraud and embezzlement. This is in line with the beginning of the case which is the object of this research. The research method used in writing this thesis is a normative legal research method. This research is analytical descriptive in nature, using secondary legal data and primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, collected from the results of library research, then processed qualitatively. The results of data processing from research results are concluded with the deductive method. Based on the research that has been done, it can be concluded that the criminal responsibility applied by the Panel of Judges is not quite right, the perpetrators should have applied criminal responsibility using two articles, namely the crime of fraud and embezzlement. The Panel of Judges when examining and deciding cases is more careful based on the facts of the trial, the evidence is available so that there is no mistake in deciding a criminal case.
Penyelesaian Perselisihan dalam Praktik Kedokteran Mengacu pada Undang-Undang Kesehatan 2023 Idris, Berlian; Prastopo; Prasetyo, Boedi
Jurnal Humaya: Jurnal Hukum, Humaniora, Masyarakat, dan Budaya Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Terbuka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33830/humaya.v4i2.10298

Abstract

Dispute can occur in medical practice if patient(s) feel their interests are being damaged or they received results not as expected. This study is a normative, qualitative research using secondary data on dispute resolution in accordance to Act Number 17 Year 2023 on Health, compared to before the Law was enacted. According to the Act, patients or their representatives who felt aggrieved can report the doctor(s) to Professional Disciplinary Council, to the authorities for suspected criminal act, and/or to the court for civil act violation. The Council’s recommendation that states there is a violation on current standards is required for criminal investigation to proceed, and for civil lawsuit to go to court. Such requirement is nonexistent in Act Number 29 Year 2004 on Medical Practice. This could be observed in the case of dr. Dewa Ayu Sasiary Prawan, et al in 2010 where patient Mrs. Julia Fransiska Makatey that they treated was deceased. They were found not guilty in district court, sentenced to imprisonment in Supreme Court cassation, and finally ruled not guilty in Supreme Court judicial review verdict because no proven standard violations. Learning from this, such Council that has utmost integrity and works profesionally is needed for a fair dispute resolution.
Analisis Yuridis Urgensi Pembentukan Satuan Unit Kerja Rehabilitasi Bagi Militer Penyalah Guna Narkotika Sanggel, Ade C I; Prastopo; Ahmad Jaeni
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 3 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i3.1564

Abstract

Penyalahgunaan narkotika di kalangan militer menjadi persoalan serius karena berdampak langsung terhadap integritas, disiplin, dan daya tempur prajurit. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis urgensi pembentukan satuan unit kerja rehabilitasi bagi militer penyalah guna narkotika dan meninjau aspek yuridis dari kebijakan pemidanaan tambahan berupa pemberhentian tidak dengan hormat (PTDH). Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif-analitis, menggunakan data primer hasil wawancara dengan Babinkum TNI dan Deputi Rehabilitasi BNN, serta data sekunder berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dan dokumen kebijakan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat kesenjangan perlakuan hukum antara sistem peradilan umum dan peradilan militer dalam penanganan kasus penyalahgunaan narkotika. Ketiadaan kebijakan rehabilitasi dalam yurisdiksi militer berpotensi mengabaikan asas kesetaraan di hadapan hukum dan menghambat pemulihan prajurit. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan regulasi khusus berupa Peraturan Panglima TNI yang mengatur mekanisme rehabilitasi di lingkungan TNI. Implikasi dari studi ini diharapkan mendorong reformasi hukum militer yang lebih adil, manusiawi, dan responsif terhadap kebutuhan pemulihan individu serta ketahanan institusional.
ANALISIS TINDAK PIDANA SENGAJA MELAKUKAN PENYERANGAN KEPADA SEORANG ATASAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 134-K/PMT-II/BDG/AL/IX/2022): Analysis Of The Crime Of Intentionally Committing Attack On A Superior (Study Decision Number 134-K/PMT-II/BDG/AL/IX/2022) Agung Satria Susanto; Prastopo
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 3 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v7i3.23019

Abstract

The criminal act of insubordination within the military is a serious offense that disrupts the hierarchical structure and discipline among soldiers. This study examines the compatibility between the elements of insubordination as defined in Article 106 of the Military Criminal Code (KUHPM) and the defendant’s actions in Decision Number: 134-K/PMT-II/BDG/AL/IX/2022. The problems discussed include the elements of the military crime involving a subordinate attacking a superior, and whether the defendant’s actions, based on the legal facts in the aforementioned ruling, align with the elements of insubordination as applied by the judges. This research adopts a normative legal approach and employs qualitative analysis. The findings reveal that not all elements in Article 106 KUHPM were fulfilled, particularly the absence of physical violence, making Article 105 KUHPM more appropriate for prosecution. The study concludes that misclassification of the article led to inaccurate judicial considerations. The recommendation emphasizes the need for greater judicial precision in assessing criminal elements to ensure the achievement of substantive justice.
TINDAK PIDANA DENGAN SENGAJA DAN TERBUKA MELANGGAR KESUSILAAN DILAKUKAN OLEH MILITER (PUTUSAN NOMOR 62-K/PM. II-10/AD/XI/2021) : The Crime Of Willfully And Openly Violating Decency Committed By The Military (Verdict Number 62-K/Pm. II-10/Ad/XI/2021) Muhammad Faritza Ardeanny Kurniawan; Prastopo
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i1.18929

Abstract

Every citizen, including members of the military, who commit criminal offenses will be processed in accordance with applicable regulations, including violations of military decency decided in Decision Number 62-K / PM. II-10/AD/XI/2021. One of the issues raised is: Does the defendant's actions fulfill the elements of the crime of decency as stipulated in Article 281 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code? and Was the conviction of the defendant based on the provisions of Article 281 Paragraph (1) that the criminal act of intentionally and openly violating decency was appropriate? This research uses normative legal research with descriptive analytical research type. Secondary data obtained from literature study is used for qualitative analysis, and conclusions are made using deductive logic. The results showed that the perpetrator did not commit the elements mentioned in Article 281 Paragraph (1), but the defendant committed a criminal offense that fulfilled the elements mentioned in Article 284 Paragraph (1) 2nd letter-a. The punishment of the defendant based on the provision that the criminal offense intentionally and openly violates decency is not in accordance with Article 281 Paragraph (1), but rather uses the provisions mentioned in Article 284.
Co-Authors Agung Satria Susanto Ahmad Jaeni Idris, Berlian Muhammad Faritza Ardeanny Kurniawan Prasetyo, Boedi Pratama, Alvinza Aditya Sanggel, Ade C I