Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

MANAJEMEN SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA DI UD KUDA MASS DALAM MENINGKATKAN KINERJA KARYAWAN M. Zikwan; A. Muhyiddin Khotib
Al-Idarah Vol 1 No 2 (2020): Al-Idārah : Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam Universitas Ibrahimy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (269.3 KB) | DOI: 10.35316/idarah.2020.v1i2.70-85

Abstract

Human Resources is one of the resources contained in the organization, including all people who carry out activities. In general, the resources contained in the organization can be grouped into two types, Human Resources, Resources. Included in this non-human resource group include capital, machinery, technology, materials. UD Kuda Mass Turen Malang is a UD which operates in the Macaroni sector, in its role as one of the driving wheels of the economy in the village of Reject Turen Malang UD Kuda mass was exposed to UD who maintained Islamic ethics, in the sense that UD Kuda Mass did not only work for the world alone. however, the application of the responsibility of a Muslim is also carried out at the UD. In his duties as an entrepreneur that combines the world and the hereafter.
Taghlidh al-Uqubah and Reverse Proof: Criminal Law Protection of People with Disabilities Perspective Maqashid al-Syariah Wiwin Nur Jannah; Khairunnisa; A. Muhyiddin Khotib
Wasathiyyah Vol 8 No 2 (2026): Wasathiyyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Fikih dan Ushul Fikih
Publisher : Wasathiyyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58470/wasathiyyah.v8i2.154

Abstract

Indonesia's criminal justice system fails to provide proportional justice for disabled victims due to strict evidentiary requirements in Article 183 KUHAP and standardized sentencing in the KUHP that ignores victim vulnerability. Employing a normative legal approach grounded in maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah, this study formulates a legal reconstruction to resolve these systemic deadlocks through a dual breakthrough. First, it addresses evidentiary barriers by introducing the reversal of the burden of proof via qiyās al-awlā; since reversing the burden of proof is permissible to safeguard state assets (ḥifẓ al-māl), its application is far more urgent (ḍarūrī) to protect the lives and dignity (ḥifẓ al-nafs and ḥifẓ al-ʿirḍ) of persons with disabilities. Second, it reconstructs sentencing through tiered penalty enhancement (taghlīẓ al-ʿuqūbah) based on layered vulnerability, leveraging taʿzīr flexibility, ulī al-amr discretion, and sadd al-dharīʿah to mandate maximum penalties for crimes exploiting vulnerable groups (istighlāl al-ḍuʿafāʾ). Integrating positive law with fiqh jināyah effectively dismantles systemic impunity and secures substantive justice for persons with disabilities.