Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Padjadjaran Journal of International Law
Chloryne Trie Isana Dewi
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
WIRETAPPING ON SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS CABLE: QUESTIONING ITS LEGALITY AMIDST LONG STANDING PRACTICE Hafidz L. Botua; Chloryne Trie Isana Dewi; R. Achmad Gusman Catur Siswandi
Padjadjaran Journal of International Law Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): Padjadjaran Journal of International Law, Volume 6, Number 1, January 2022
Publisher : International Law Department, Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/pjil.v6i1.772

Abstract

Up to 95% of the communication infrastructures are currently served by the submarine communications cable networks, which in their utilisation connect a wide variety of communications data. The increasingly advanced infrastructure is in fact unable to go hand in hand with legal transformation. At the present time, international law provides only partial protection in form of prevention against damage to the cable networks. Consequently, in the event that data transmissions across the cable networks are illegally exploited by foreign parties through "wiretapping" without inflicting any damage, as long as it is committed in the body of waters outside the state's sovereignty, the international law is unable to explicitly address this situation. The wiretapping has occurred in a couple of instances, however, the proper preventive measures are still in question. Fortunately, the most recent practice of international law in the field of human rights has provided some clarities through case law. Despite the fact that it has only been applied regionally, this endeavour is at the very least capable of supporting future proposed legal reforms. This article will further elaborate on the legality of wiretapping on submarine communications cable networks based on the relevant field of international law, which eventually revealed that such conduct is contrary to cyber law, international law of the sea and human rights law.
The Reversed Implementation of the ICC’s Principle of Complementarity: Case Study of Argentina Investigation for Rohingyas Christyanti, B. Lora; Diajeng Wulan Christianti; Chloryne Trie Isana Dewi
Padjadjaran Journal of International Law Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): Padjadjaran Journal of International Law, Volume 7, Number 1, January 2023
Publisher : International Law Department, Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/pjil.v7i1.965

Abstract

Complementarity is the basic principle of the ICC’s jurisdiction. As a fundamental principle, it harmonizes the relationship between ICC and National Courts. The Rome Statute clearly states that the ICC is complementary to national courts. However, in the case of Rohingya, the Argentine Lower Court applied this principle in reverse by rejecting the investigation, requested by the Burmese Rohingya Organization UK under universal jurisdiction, for the case of Rohingya since the ICC had already investigated a similar case. This paper seeks to answer whether the ICC’s complementarity principle can be applied in reverse, as decided by the Argentine Lower Court, according to international law. A juridical normative research method will be used to address these issues. In addition, the recognized principles of interpretation in international law will be used to enrich the meaning of the ICC’s complementarity. Based on the analysis, it is obvious that, according to international law, the complementarity cannot be applied in reverse, even by states parties to the Rome Statute. According to the Rome Statute's provisions, every State is required to exercise criminal jurisdiction over persons responsible for international crimes. For this reason, this paper strengthens the arguments for the Argentine Appeal Court to overturn the Lower Court’s decision and reopen the investigation into the case.
Co-Authors Christyanti, B. Lora Diajeng Wulan Christianti Hafidz L. Botua R. Achmad Gusman Catur Siswandi