Nor Lutfi Fais
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Mushaf Blawong Gogodalem: Interpretasi Sejarah Melalui Pendekatan Kodikologi Nor Lutfi Fais; Abdul Jamil; Sukendar Sukendar
SUHUF Vol 15 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur'an

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22548/shf.v15i1.703

Abstract

This study focuses on four Quranic manuscripts located in Gogodalem. According to local beliefs, the manuscripts were written by Mbah Jamaluddin. However, preliminary study shows that the four manuscripts cannot be attributed to Mbah Jamaluddin. The use of manuscript paper that is not found chain line along the vertical line of the paper indicates that the manuscript came from the early 19th century. In addition, the existing style of authorship also indicates that all manuscripts were written by more than one person. Through codicological and historical approaches, this study seeks to provide a historical interpretation of Gogodalem’s manuscripts. The result found that the four manuscripts had a relationship with the Surakarta Palace. This interpretation is based on the use of the manuscript paper, the illumination model, and the historical relationships it has. Meanwhile, the description of the manuscript shows that the rasm used is a mixture of usmani and imla̅'i̅, and followed qiraat of Imam Hafṣ. It used also a simple and inconspicuous model of floral illumination.
Jejak Tafsir Parateksual di Indonesia Nor Lutfi Fais; Kun Khoiro Umam Al Muafa; Egi Tanadi Taufik
SUHUF Vol 18 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur'an

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22548/shf.v18i1.1299

Abstract

This article examines quotations of Al-Wahidiy’s and Al-Ijiy’s Qur’an interpolations in a Jalalain manuscript, located in the Museum of the Grand Masjid of Central Java. The presence of these interpolations reflects the tradition of peripheral Qur’an commentary. This research adapts the codicological and paratextual analysis to determine the paratextual interpolation of the two Qur’an commentaries, while identifying the manuscript culture of the Jalalayn manuscript in the past. Results suggest that each interpolation of Al-Wahidiy and Al-Ijiy is quoted in different circumstances within a distinctive pattern. The scribe did not act arbitrarily in presenting the paratexts, but instead involved the cognitive process of understanding and signifying the Qur’anic text. This instance is visible from the differences between the original text given by the original authors compared to the paratext of the scribe, e.g. additions and reductions. Nevertheless, the textual source used by the scribe is undetermined, considering the absence of historical data on the circulation of Al-Wahidiy’s and Al-Ijiy’s manuscripts in the past.