Ida Kurnia Shofa
Institut Daarul Qur'an Jakarta

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Irony Of Intolerance Of Al-Qur'an Interpretation On Indonesian Social Media Ida Kurnia Shofa; Feny Nida Fitriyani
Khatulistiwa Vol 12, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : The Pontianak State Institute of Islamic Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24260/khatulistiwa.v12i1.2366

Abstract

Social media is one of the most influential things in human life. Its utilization is no longer for social interaction, more than that, it is used as a very effective shifting paradigm for the wider community. This article seeks to explore the irony of intolerance to the message of the Qur’an in Indonesian social media on one of the Da'wah Youtube channels. Using analytical descriptive method, this research is focused on da’wah YouTuber Firanda Andirja. The results of this study indicate that Firanda's da'wah youtube channel explores Islamic law in daily life and the interpretation of the verses of the Qur'an. In the interpretation of the Qur'anic verse, he does not use ta'wil, ta'thil and takyif so as to produce a rigid interpretation of other religious ideological group. The religious nuances that he adheres to make his interpretation cannot be purified from his ideology, so that it seems to defend a certain religious group is intolerant of other groups. Firanda's thought needs to be deconstructed, because the explanation of his interpretation contains rigid criticisms that are classified as being intolerant of the customs and culture of the Indonesian so that the explanation will actually cause new problems, especially since the interpretation was born in Indonesia which has multi-cultures and religions. So, the interpretation is not suitable when used as a moral-oriented interpretation reference. 
Problems in Classifying Gender Relations Verses: An Analysis of Musdah Mulia and Faqihuddin Abdul Kodir Ida Kurnia Shofa; Hamdani Anwar; Romlah Widayati
Majalah Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Pemikiran Keagamaan Tajdid Vol 28, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15548/tajdid.v28i2.13632

Abstract

This study addresses ongoing debates in feminist Qur’anic interpretation in Indonesia, focusing on epistemological ambiguities in classifying verses on gender relations. It aims to critically compare the interpretive methodologies of Musdah Mulia and Faqihuddin Abdul Kodir, two influential scholars representing different feminist hermeneutical approaches. Employing qualitative library research with a critical-comparative and epistemological framework, this study analyzes their main works and relevant supporting literature. The findings show that Musdah Mulia promotes a humanist-feminist interpretation that prioritizes gender justice and equality as the Qur’an’s primary ethical horizon. Although effective in challenging patriarchal interpretations, this approach raises epistemological issues due to its reliance on external ethical standards to distinguish normative from historical verses. Conversely, Faqihuddin Abdul Kodir’s Qirā’ah Mubādalah treats all verses as normative through the reconstruction of reciprocal gender relations, offering greater structural consistency but creating tension between textual fidelity and hermeneutical reconstruction based on mutual ethics. This study concludes that both approaches reflect a fundamental structural problem in feminist Qur’anic interpretation: the absence of a coherent Qur’anic theoretical framework integrating ethics, textual authority, and methodology. It recommends the development of an integrative interpretive model grounded in internal Qur’anic epistemology to strengthen future feminist exegesis.