Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Improving Employee Performance Through Motivation and Work Discipline Riris T Simamora, Prietsaweny; Binur Pretty Napitupulu; Dameria Girsang
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (February 2023)
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v3i2.183

Abstract

This study looked at the relationship between performance and motivation and discipline at Radjak Hospital Salemba. This study used quantitative data collected through a Likert scale with the SPSS version 23 program. Data were collected from 221 patients at Radjak Hospital Salemba. This hospital is located in the northwestern part of Indonesia and is staffed by local residents. This research uses quantitative descriptive research. A population of 221 people was tested using the Slovin sample formula, and at least 69 people were included in the sample. The results are positive, with a Sig Value of 0.259 and a T-Test Result of 0.040. Additionally, 3. Based on the results of multiple linear regression, work motivation and work discipline have a positive effect on employee performance. This influence can be seen in the constant values ??of 0.797 and 0.259 for positive work motivation and work discipline, respectively. In addition, the Sig T test shows that the two characteristics of work ethics have a significant effect on employee performance with values ??of 0.040 and 0.000 respectively. Work motivation and discipline also affect employee performance by 69.4% which is explained from the results of the R square test. The remaining 30.6% due to this influence is caused by other factors not examined in this study.
THE IMPACT OF STRESS AND WORK MOTIVATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF EMPLOYEES IN THE SIANTAR CITY MANPOWER DEPARTMENT Binur Pretty Napitupulu; Haervi Yunira
Journal of Golden Generation Economic Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): AGUSTUS 2025 : Journal of Golden Generation Economic
Publisher : PT. Lembaga Penerbit Penelitian Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65244/jggeconomic.v1i1.34

Abstract

Work stress and motivation are two factors that can influence the increase or decrease in employee performance. This study aims to determine and analyze the effect of work stress and work motivation on employee performance at the Siantar City Manpower Office. The focus of the study is limited to two independent variables, namely work stress and work motivation, and one dependent variable, namely employee performance. The formulation of the problem raised is whether work stress and work motivation affect employee performance. The population in this study amounted to 58 people who were also used as samples. The approach used is quantitative, with data collection through questionnaires and using secondary data. The data analysis technique used is multiple linear regression, with hypothesis testing through the t-test (partial), F-test (simultaneous), and the Coefficient of Determination (R²). The results of the study show a regression model Y = 0.550 + 0.447X₁ + 0.398X₂, where X₁ is work stress and X₂ is work motivation. Partially, work stress has a significant effect on employee performance with a significance value of 0.001 (<0.05) and a t-count of 3.543 (> t-table 1.673). Work motivation also shows a partial significant effect with a significance value of 0.002 (<0.05) and a t-count of 3.225 (> t-table 1.673). Simultaneously, both variables have a significant effect on employee performance, with a significance value of 0.000 (<0.05) and an F-count of 34.156 (> F-table 3.17). The coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.554 indicates that 55.4% of the variation in employee performance is influenced by work stress and work motivation, while the remaining 44.6% is influenced by other factors outside this study. Thus, the relationship between work stress, work motivation, and employee performance is quite strong but not dominant.