Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG MUHAMAD DLUHA
JUSTNESS - Jurnal Hukun dan Agama Vol 2 No 2 (2022): September 2022
Publisher : STIH Zainul Hasan Kraksaan Kraksaan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61974/justness.v2i2.29

Abstract Corruption crime has a very broad scope into 7 types, namely state financial losses, bribery, bribery, abuse of office/authority, extortion, fraudulent acts, conflicts of interest and gratuities. Corruption is an extraordinary crime, so the threat of criminal sanctions is very heavy. The problems studied in this study and their objectives can be formulated firstly to determine the provisions on abuse of authority in corruption crimes regulated in Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes (UUPTPK) and secondly to find out criminal sanctions against perpetrators of corruption in the abuse of authority in the UUPTPK mentioned above. Based on the formulation of the problem and research objectives, the method used in this research is normative juridical, namely by reviewing legislation, legal theories related to the problems discussed and based on their nature using descriptive analytical methods is research that clearly describes and pay close attention to the matters in question. The results of the research in this thesis, firstly, the provisions on abuse of authority in criminal acts of corruption are clearly regulated in Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 jo. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption (UUPTPK) and the two criminal sanctions against perpetrators of corruption in abuse of authority are life imprisonment or imprisonment for a minimum of 1 (one) year and a maximum of 20 (twenty) years and or a minimum fine of Rp. 50,000,000 (Fifty Million Rupiah) and a maximum of Rp. 1,000,000,000.00 (One Billion Rupiah).

PROSES PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH ANAK Cahyono, Rudi; Muhamad Dluha; Samsul Huda
JUSTNESS - Jurnal Hukun dan Agama Vol 3 No 2 (2023): September 2023
Publisher : STIH Zainul Hasan Kraksaan Kraksaan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61974/justness.v3i2.50

Abstract Children who incidentally have not been able to think and act maturely sometimes do things that are irregular and against the law that can result in harm to others so that the victims and perpetrators admit to being unfair to each other. crimes committed by children. The benefits of this research are to find out the efforts or processes of investigation and investigation of criminal acts carried out by children, the method taken using the Juridical Empirical method by combining primary and secondary data obtained from the field in the form of interviews and other legal sources. The research in writing this thesis is the mechanism of investigation and investigation carried out by the Probolinggo resort police in criminal acts committed by children is to use the legal basis of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The juvenile criminal justice system is in accordance with Law Number 11 of 2012. The suggestion of this research is that legal protection in the process of investigating children should be given more attention because this concerns the future of children who still need guidance from adults. Keywords: Investigation, Crime, Children

TINJAUAN YURIDIS KEPASTIAN HUKUM PEMILIKAN RUMAH OLEH ORANG ASING YANG BERKEDUDUKAN DI INDONESIA MENURUT PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 103 TAHUN 2015 TENTANG PEMILIKAN RUMAH TEMPAT TINGGAL ATAU HUNIAN ORANG ASING YANG BERKEDUDUKAN DI INDONESIA: TINJAUAN YURIDIS KEPASTIAN HUKUM PEMILIKAN RUMAH OLEH ORANG ASING YANG BERKEDUDUKAN DI INDONESIA MENURUT PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 103 TAHUN 2015 TENTANG PEMILIKAN RUMAH TEMPAT TINGGAL ATAU HUNIAN ORANG ASING YANG BERKEDUDUKAN DI INDONESIA admin, Admin; Moh. Rizki Sapta Gunawan; Kholidazia Elhamzah Fathullah; Muhamad Dluha
JUSTNESS - Jurnal Hukun dan Agama Vol 4 No 2 (2024): September 2024
Publisher : STIH Zainul Hasan Kraksaan Kraksaan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61974/justness.v4i2.72

Abstract This research discusses "Juridical Review Of The Legal Certainty Of Home Ownership By Foreign People Residing In Indonesia According To Government Regulation Number 103 Of 2015 Concerning Ownership Of Houses In Which Foreign People Reside In Indonesia". The background to this research emphasizes the issue of land ownership by foreigners, which is often a complicated and confusing topic in the legal realm, because it does not only cover aspects of ownership itself. This research aims to find out and understand the legal certainty of ownership of a residence or residence by foreigners domiciled in Indonesia according to PP No. 103 of 2015. As well as understanding the mechanisms for implementing and enforcing laws regarding home ownership by foreigners as regulated in PP No. 103 of 2015. The research method used is normative law, namely discussing problems using the approach of Law PP Number 103 of 2015. The results of the research state that the mechanism for implementing and enforcing the law regarding home ownership by foreigners is as regulated in PP No. 103 of 2015. And regarding legal certainty of ownership of residential or residential houses by foreigners domiciled in Indonesia according to PP No. 103 of 2015 in accordance with the original Article 21 paragraph (3) of the UUPA which states that foreigners obtain property rights due to inheritance without a will or mixing of assets due to marriage. Keywords : Legal Certainty, Foreign Citizens, Land Ownership

TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PELAKU DEMONSTRASI YANG MELAKUKAN PERBUATAN MELANGGAR HUKUM BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 9 TAHUN 1998 TENTANG KEMERDEKAAN MENYAMPAIKAN PENDAPAT DI MUKA UMUM: TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PELAKU DEMONSTRASI YANG MELAKUKAN PERBUATAN MELANGGAR HUKUM BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 9 TAHUN 1998 TENTANG KEMERDEKAAN MENYAMPAIKAN PENDAPAT DI MUKA UMUM admin, Admin; Irfan Baihaqi; Muhamad Dluha; Rudi Cahyono
JUSTNESS - Jurnal Hukun dan Agama Vol 4 No 2 (2024): September 2024
Publisher : STIH Zainul Hasan Kraksaan Kraksaan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61974/justness.v4i2.73

Abstract Expressing opinions in public is a right and can be exercised by anyone because this is protected in the Indonesian constitution. So, as stipulated in the explanation of Law number 9 of 1998 concerning Independence. Expressing opinions in public must be based on the principle of balance between rights and obligations, the principle of deliberation and consensus, the principle of legal certainty and justice, the principle of proportionality, and the principle of benefit. The aim of this research is to determine and analyze law enforcement against demonstration perpetrators who violate the law based on Law Number 9 of 1998 and to determine the supervision of demonstrations so that anarchy does not occur. The benefit of this research is to provide an understanding regarding law enforcement and escorting perpetrators of demonstrations that violate the law. Based on the formulation of the problem and research objectives, the method used is normative juridical, namely by examining statutory regulations, legal theories related to the problem being discussed and based on its nature, using descriptive analytical methods, namely research that describes clearly and carefully the things that are discussed. in question. What is being analyzed is Law Number 9 of 1998 concerning Freedom to Express Opinions in Public. The results of this research illustrate that law enforcement against perpetrators of anarchist demonstrations has been specifically regulated in article 16 of Law Number 9 of 1998 which states that perpetrators or participants in conveying opinions in public who commit acts that violate the law, can be subject to legal sanctions in accordance with the provisions of the Regulations. Applicable legislation. Second, to guard and supervise demonstrations so that anarchy does not occur, procedures for carrying out demonstrations have been established based on Law Number 9 of 1998 which have been regulated in articles 9 to article 14 and have also been regulated in Police Regulation Number 7 of 2012. Keywords: Anarchy, Demonstrations, Unlawful Acts

Implementasi Program Rumah Restorative Justice Kejaksaan Negeri Kabupaten Probolinggo dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Ringan Bebly Rajes Punjabi; Muhamad Dluha; Kholidazia El Hamzah F.
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 3: April 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v5i3.16181

Penerapan Restorative Justice (RJ) oleh Kejaksaan merupakan bagian dari pembaruan sistem Peradilan Pidana yang berorientasi pada keadilan substantif dan pemulihan hubungan sosial. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh dinamika penerapan Restorative Justice di Kejaksaan Negeri Kabupaten Probolinggo, khususnya perubahan mekanisme prosedural sejak awal tahun 2026 serta hambatan dalam implementasinya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis implementasi Program Rumah Restorative Justice dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana ringan serta mengidentifikasi hambatan yang dihadapi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum empiris dengan pendekatan Socio-Legal Research dan Statute Approach, melalui wawancara, observasi, dan studi dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan Restorative Justice di Kejaksaan Negeri Kabupaten Probolinggo dilaksanakan secara selektif dengan memenuhi syarat normatif dan sosiologis, termasuk verifikasi terhadap latar belakang tersangka, pelaksanaan dalam waktu 14 hari setelah Tahap II, serta kewajiban ekspos kepada Kejaksaan Tinggi sebelum diterbitkan SKP2. Di wilayah Jawa Timur, persetujuan penghentian penuntutan cukup dikeluarkan oleh Kepala Kejaksaan Tinggi. Hambatan utama yang ditemukan adalah tuntutan ganti rugi korban yang tidak proporsional serta rendahnya pemahaman masyarakat terhadap mekanisme penyelesaian melalui Rumah Restorative Justice. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pelaksanaan RJ telah berjalan efektif, namun masih memerlukan penguatan sosialisasi dan penyempurnaan mekanisme teknis.

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 5 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search