Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Juridical Analysis Of Central And Regional Government Development Implementation Given Law Number 25 Of 2004 Concerning The National Development Planning System Maria Yeti Andrias; Yulianus Payzon Aituru; Liani Sari; Sardjana Orba Manullang
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 5 (2022): Desember: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Many things happened after the collapse of the New Order government in Indonesia. Reform necessitated a change in the constitution so that, in the end, the direction of national development also changed. Where previously it was the Outlines of State Policy, now it is formulated in law through the National Development Planning System. This study aims to find out and analyze the implementation of development by the central and regional governments according to Law Number 25 of 2004 concerning the National Development Planning System. The normative research method analyzes law, legal principles, legal rules, legal systems, and various juridical concepts. The data needed in this writing is secondary data as the main data and primary data as supporting data—legal materials, namely data obtained from literature studies, archives, and library materials. The study results show that the SPPN Law is even more appropriate and follows the constitutional mandate. This law is consistent as a reference for planning. Then it accommodates guidelines for regularly planning, compiling, establishing and evaluating long and medium-term development policies. Furthermore, the basis for implementing development planning is determined by legal products that are formally regulated and stipulated by hierarchical laws and regulations.
Constitutional law implications of the implementation of attorney general regulation number 15 of 2020 for crime victims Farida Tuharea; Wahyudi BR; Andi Annisa Nurlia Mamonto; Liani Sari
Journal of Law Science Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): January : Law Science
Publisher : Institute Of computer Science (IOCS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/jls.v6i1.4534

Abstract

This research aims to examine the effects of Attorney General’s Regulation (PERJA) Number 15 of 2020 on Indonesian Constitutional Law, specifically examining victim rights and responsibilities and elements of legal certainty in relation to the Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice. Human rights, victim protection, and procedural justice are some of the Constitutional Law elements that are examined in this study. This study combines philosophical and analytical approaches to normative law with a critical and logical examination of applicable legal theory and police tactics. The relevant rules and statutes are described using analytical descriptive methodologies. Despite presenting obstacles to legal certainty owing to its flexible approach, the study findings demonstrate that the adoption of restorative justice via the Attorney General's Regulation has significantly increased victims' rights in the recovery and reconciliation process. To promote a shift in Indonesia's criminal justice system towards a greater emphasis on justice, victim healing, and societal interests, the Attorney General's Regulation seeks to strike a balance by outlining a clear framework.