Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Study of Judge's Decisions in Upholding Restorative Justice Law for Defendants and Victims of Underage Children Nurul Fatimah Az Zahro; Muchamad Iksan; Natangsa Surbakti; Peggy Dian Septi Nur Angraini
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 5 (2022): Desember: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The criminal act of intercourse committed by the accused and the victim under the age of the need to apply restorative justice where the child is a form of hope to continue the hopes of the nation and state. This research method is normative juridical with statutory and case approaches and comparisons. The aim of the research is to find out and analyze the law enforcement of restorative justice for defendants under the age of study, Decision Number: 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/Pn, Decision Number: 7/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/Pn.Skt , and Decision Number 9/Pid.Sus-Children/2021/Pn.Skh. The results of the research show that Decision Number: 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/Pn and Decision Number: 7/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/Pn.Skt do not apply restorative justice where the judge prefers to impose prison sentences on children. Meanwhile, Decision Number 9/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/Pn.Skh. has implemented restorative justice in the form of more action being imposed than to carry out imprisonment for children. Indeed, the crime of intercourse is not included as a crime that is resolved by restorative justice, but it needs to be seen as more in order to give the child offender the opportunity to understand the consequences of his actions and take responsibility and the community can understand the causes of crime for the sake of welfare and crime prevention. Keywords: Law Enforcement; Restorative Justice; Minors; Tindak pidana persetubuhan yang dilakukan oleh terdakwa dan korban di dibawah umur perlu menerapkan keadilan restoratif dimana anak adalah wujud harapan penerus harapan cita-cita bangsa dan negara. Metode penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan kasus serta perbandingan. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis penegakan hukum keadilan restoratif justice terhadap terdakwa anak di bawah umur studi Putusan Nomor : 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/Pn, Putusan Nomor : 7/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/Pn.Skt, dan Putusan Nomor 9/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/Pn.Skh. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Putusan Nomor : 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/Pn dan Putusan Nomor : 7/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/Pn.Skt tidak menerapkan keadilan restoratif dimana hakim lebih memberikan penjatuhan hukuman pidana penjara terhadap anak. Sedangkan Putusan Nomor 9/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/Pn.Skh. telah menerapkan keadilan restoratif berupa lebih dijatuhkan tindakan dibandingkan untuk melakukan penghukuman pidana penjara terhadap anak. Memang dalam tindak pidana persetubuhan tidak termasuk tindak pidana yang diselesaikan dengan keadilan restoratif tapi perlu dipandang lebih guna memberi kesempatan pelaku anak untuk memahami akibat tindakan dan bertanggungjawab serta masyarakat dapat memahami sebab kejahatan demi kesejahteraan dan pencegahan kejahatan. Kata kunci : Penegakan Hukum; Restoratif Justice; Anak dibawah umur;
Dispute on Execution of Criminal Confiscation Objects and General Seizures for Bankruptcy in Review from Legal Benefit Muhammad Fathin Habibullah; Natangsa Surbakti; Aidul Fitriciada Azhari; Peggy Dian Septi Nur Angraini
The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023): Maret: Politic and Sosiology
Publisher : Trigin Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/ijopsor.v10i4.66

Abstract

Criminal foreclosures and general foreclosures of bankruptcy are different. Normative juridical research with statutory and case approaches. The aim is to find out and analyze criminal enforcement and bankruptcy at the same time that there was a conflict in the execution of the Pandawa Mandiri Group Savings and Loans Cooperative case (KSP Pandawa). The results of KSP Pandawa and Nuryanto's research, the chairman of KSP Pandawa went bankrupt, the decision of the Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court and all assets were publicly confiscated. Nuryanto was convicted by the Depok District Court on charges of fictitious investment and an additional crime of auctioning all economic assets for the state. The Pandawa KSP Curator Team filed a lawsuit for a criminal verdict that was strengthened by the Supreme Court's Cassation Decision Number 3 K/Pdt.Sus-Bankrupt/2019. Amar Cassation requests that the Depok District Attorney hand over all confiscated assets to the Pandawa KSP Curator Team. The cassation decision fulfills legal benefits, KSP Pandawa can register receivables with the curator for verification and will receive proportional loss returns as stipulated in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations.