Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE BETWEEN THE SOUTH KOREAN AND INDONESIAN LAW Fery Fery; Jihyun Park
Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Vol 7 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jlpt.v7i2.7237

Abstract

There are crucial differences about the corporate governance practices based on the regulation in Indonesia and South Korea. Director and Auditor are explained in the Korean Company Law, but it is absent in the Indonesian Company Law. Hence, this research aims to discuss the comparison between representatives of directors of a company and auditors between South Korean and Indonesian companies. It adopted normative legal approach that utilized a qualitative method in analyzing data and using secondary data. All secondary data was collected from library research. It also adopted a juridical qualitative approach to analyze the secondary data. It found that the exact position of auditors in Indonesia is very different from those in South Korea. South Korean law is foreign to the term “commissioners”, it has an auditor instead. Indonesia has both director and commissioner as the boards in a company. Auditor in Indonesia is an external party that must be hired by the company.
Intellectual Property Challenges for AI-Driven Creativity: A Focus on Copyright and Patents in Emerging Economies Lu Sudirman; Hari Sutra Disemadi; Henry Soelistyo Budi; Jihyun Park; Ninne Zahara Silviani
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): May, 2025: Law, Technology, and Globalization: Challenges and Innovations in th
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v9i1.20611

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into scientific advancements has become a crucial part of daily life for many people. In the creative industry, AI has the potential to not only enhance the level of creativity, but also productivity. The legal implications of this development must be carefully analyzed for the development of the creative industry, to establish a legal position on where AI stands in the increasingly competitive market, especially when Intellectual Property Right (IPR) as a key factor is taken into account. This research examines the need for a legal framework for AI. It was conducted through the lens of intellectual property law, to determine its place within existing IPR regimes using the comparative legal method. The results conceptually justify the urgency to regulate AI, and highlights the taxonomy dilemma of AI-generated works within the current dynamics of the creative industry, indicating a taxonomy dilemma. Further analysis also indicates that while there’s a decent urgency to address all of the normative issues that exist within Indonesia’s IPR legal framework, it’s imperative that Indonesia prioritizes the development of the copyright and patent regimes, which are closely related to the nature of AI-generated works.