Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL Sospol : Jurnal Sosial Politik Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities
Anggia Valerisha, Anggia
Universitas Katolik Parahyangan
Humanities Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Dampak Praktik Konglomerasi Media Terhadap Pencapaian Konsolidasi Demokrasi di Indonesia Valerisha, Anggia
Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional Vol 12, No 1 (2016): Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional
Publisher : Parahyangan Center for International Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (517.424 KB)

Abstract

Media massa sebagai pilar keempat dari demokrasi memiliki peranan penting dalam proses konosolidasi demokrasi. Namun, di Indonesia, peran media massa sebagai alat dalam menyediakan informasi yang terbuka, bebas, benar dan objektif dan membentuk opini masyarakat masih menghadapi tantangan-tantangan dari praktek konglomerassi media atau biasa disebut – “monopoli kepemilikkan media”. Semakin diperburuk dengan karakterisasi oleh pemilik media yang berpartisipasi dalam sektor politik bahkan sebagai pemimpin dari partai politik.Tulisan ini menjelaskan bagaimana praktik monopoli yang terjadi pada sektor media telah mempengaruhi proses demokratik di Negara ini khususnya terhadap pencapaian “Konsolidasi Demokrasi”. Melalui tinjauan literatur dan analisis media, atmosfer sosial politik Indonesia sekarang telah terbentuk menjadi “Era Media”. Media mengatur hal apa yang harus didiskusikan dan hal apa yng harus dihindari untuk didiskusikan oleh masyarakat. Media memiliki kekuatan dalam memilih pemimpin Negara, media telah mengeluarkan agenda para elit politik, menjadikan berita sebagai komoditas, dan mendapatkan keuntungan dari tindakan tersebut – memberikan pemilik media kemampuan untuk membeli pengaruh politik.
IKEA IN INDONESIA: THE SYNERGY OF SWEDISH PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND NATION BRANDING Valerisha, Anggia; Ahadisuryo, Raden Fahrizal
JURNAL SOSIAL POLITIK Vol 6, No 1 (2020): Januari-Juni
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (758.296 KB) | DOI: 10.22219/sospol.v6i1.11170

Abstract

Public diplomacy and nation-branding are two popular concepts and closely related to diplomacy activities by both state and non-state actors. Szondi discusses the possible inter-connections of the two concepts and formulates understanding on how his concept can help to explain the various attempts of both state and non-state actors in achieving national interest. The unit analysis of this study is Sweden as state actor and IKEA as multi-national corporation. The existence of IKEA as company with its global-popular brand has becoming concerns for further research particularly on how IKEA brand as the instrument to supports Sweden?s public diplomacy. This study aims to analyze Swedish public diplomacy and nation-branding in Indonesia through the IKEA brand as the case study and by using the model of public diplomacy and nation-branding proposed by Szondi. The study uses qualitative method with data collection carried out through documentation studies from 2014-2018. The findings indicate that the IKEA brand has unique characteristics. In Szondi?s model, IKEA brand positioned in the incision between the area of public diplomacy activities and the area of nation-branding, which is described by Szondi as the fourth model. Through the IKEA brand, there is a synergy between Swedish public diplomacy activities and its nation- branding strategy. The IKEA brand has succeeded not only in the promotion of its products or companies, but also contributed to a positive image and reputation of Sweden and, increase social and economic engagement with Indonesia.
Pandemi Global COVID-19 dan Problematika Negara-Bangsa: Transparansi Data Sebagai Vaksin Socio-digital? Anggia Valerisha; Marshell Adi Putra
Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional 2020: Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional: Edisi Khusus
Publisher : Parahyangan Center for International Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (155.655 KB) | DOI: 10.26593/jihi.v0i0.3871.131-137

Abstract

Pandemi coronavirus COVID-19 telah memunculkan tantangan baru untuk diatasi oleh negara-bangsa.Secara khusus, yaitu mengenai bagaimana negara merespons dan berupaya mencegah dan menghentikan penyebaranvirus jauh lebih luas. Banyak negara melakukan kebijakan yang diterapkan di dalam wilayahnya, seperti sistemkebijakan lockdown, atau kebijakan menjaga jarak sosial atau social distancing terhadap masyarakat. Beberapanegara menunjukkan keberhasilan, tetapi ada pula yang menunjukkan kegagalan dari kebijakan ini. Kedua kebijakanini adalah contoh dari vaksin sosial yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah dalam menanggapi keadaan darurat ini. Namun,vaksin sosial masih perlu didukung oleh elemen lain, dan salah satu yang paling penting adalah tentang transparansidata. Artikel ini membahas masalah yang dihadapi oleh negara-bangsa terkait dengan transparansi data dan mengapatransparansi data dapat disebut sebagai 'vaksin sosio-digital' untuk mencegah penyebaran virus corona. Tulisan inididasari pada argumentasi bahwa, meskipun data merupakan bagian dari spektrum digital, tetapi bagaimanapemerintah memperlakukan data, apakah itu transparan atau tidak, tetap memiliki dampak bagi aspek sosial danpolitik terhadap bangsa dan negara.
IKEA in Indonesia: The Synergy of Swedish Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding Anggia Valerisha; Raden Fahrizal Ahadisuryo
Sospol : Jurnal Sosial Politik Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): Januari-Juni
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/sospol.v6i1.11170

Abstract

Public diplomacy and nation-branding are two popular concepts and closely related to diplomacy activities by both state and non-state actors. Szondi discusses the possible inter-connections of the two concepts and formulates understanding on how his concept can help to explain the various attempts of both state and non-state actors in achieving national interest. The unit analysis of this study is Sweden as state actor and IKEA as multi-national corporation. The existence of IKEA as company with its global-popular brand has becoming concerns for further research particularly on how IKEA brand as the instrument to supports Sweden’s public diplomacy. This study aims to analyze Swedish public diplomacy and nation-branding in Indonesia through the IKEA brand as the case study and by using the model of public diplomacy and nation-branding proposed by Szondi. The study uses qualitative method with data collection carried out through documentation studies from 2014-2018. The findings indicate that the IKEA brand has unique characteristics. In Szondi’s model, IKEA brand positioned in the incision between the area of public diplomacy activities and the area of nation-branding, which is described by Szondi as the fourth model. Through the IKEA brand, there is a synergy between Swedish public diplomacy activities and its nation- branding strategy. The IKEA brand has succeeded not only in the promotion of its products or companies, but also contributed to a positive image and reputation of Sweden and, increase social and economic engagement with Indonesia.
Crisis Communication in the Time Of COVID-19: The Significance of Grassroot Initiative in Democratic Countries (Case of Brazil, Indonesia, and the United States) Marshell Adi Putra; Ignasius Loyola Adhi Bhaskara; Anggia Valerisha
Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities Vol 11, No 1 (2021): Special Issue: Global Society in the Time of COVID-19
Publisher : Deputy of Social Sciences and Humanities, the Indonesia Institute of Sciences (LIPI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/jissh.v11i1.210

Abstract

All countries are adapting to the dynamics and changes posed by the global pandemic of COVID-19. The government is expected to act immediately and effectively in response to the crisis, particularly through public communication to their respective citizens. In this regard, crisis communication is vital to minimize the loss and damage caused by the pandemic in various aspects of life. Being able to communicate in the right and effective way during a crisis can determine the overall outcome of the situation. This paper explores on how crisis communication has conducted in the time of COVID-19 by comparing three respective democratic governments: Brazil, Indonesia, and the United States. Through qualitative method, this paper argues that in a democratic society where openness and freedom of speech is guaranteed, the process to disseminate information through crisis communication could be a daunting task. The study indicated at least four main factors that could hinder the effectiveness of crisis communication: 1) a large population and politically divide in the society; 2) the lack of coordination between levels of governments; 3) the governments’ lack of capability to communicate with the public; and 4) an incompetent crisis communication strategy. The study also found some of the grassroot initiative which is seen significance to fill the information gaps left by the government.
Crisis Communication In The Time Of Covid-19: The Significance of Grassroot Initiative in Democratic Countries (Case of Brazil, Indonesia, and the United States) Marshell Adi Putra; Ign. L. Adhi Bhaskara; Anggia Valerisha
Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 11 (2021): Global Society in the Time of COVID-19
Publisher : RMPI-BRIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

All countries are adapting to the dynamics and changes posed by the global pandemic of COVID-19. The government is expected to act immediately and effectively in response to the crisis, particularly through public communication to their respective citizens. In this regard, crisis communication is vital to minimize the loss and damage caused by the pandemic in various aspects of life. Being able to communicate in the right and effective way during a crisis can determine the overall outcome of the situation. This paper explores on how crisis communication has conducted in the time of COVID-19 by comparing three respective democratic governments: Brazil, Indonesia, and the United States. Through qualitative method, this paper argues that in a democratic society where openness and freedom of speech is guaranteed, the process to disseminate information through crisis communication could be a daunting task. The study indicated at least four main factors that could hinder the effectiveness of crisis communication: 1) a large population and politically divide in the society; 2) the lack of coordination between levels of governments; 3) the governments’ lack of capability to communicate with the public; and 4) an incompetent crisis communication strategy. The study also found some of the grassroot initiative which is seen significance to fill the information gaps left by the government.
Co-Authors Ahadisuryo, Raden Fahrizal Bhaskara, Ignasius Loyola Adhi Ign. L. Adhi Bhaskara Marshell Adi Putra Marshell Adi Putra Raden Fahrizal Ahadisuryo