Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

HARMONISASI UNDANG – UNDANG KEPAILITAN ANAK PERUSAHAAN BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA Maharani Putri Handayani; Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan; Dewi Iryani
SETARA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2022): SETARA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Bung Karno

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59017/setara.v3i1.252

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to examine and analyze the harmonization of bankruptcy laws of state-owned enterprises (BUMN) subsidiaries. Law No. 37 of 2004 does not provide an explanation regarding SOE subsidiaries so that it is necessary to harmonize laws and regulations regarding the bankruptcy of SOE subsidiaries.The method used in this research is normative legal research. The data used are secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal entities. To analyze the data, it is done by qualitative juridical analysis method.The results of the research obtained are the harmonization of the laws and regulations of the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU No. 37 of 2004 Against SOE Law No. 19 of 2003 in finding the bankruptcy of a subsidiary of a BUMN that a subsidiary of a BUMN can be bankrupted by other than the Minister of Finance because in Article 2 paragraph (5) of Law no. 37 of 2004 concerning SOEs operating in the public sector, which is not divided by shares, is harmonized with Article 1 paragraph (4) No. 19 of 2003 SOEs that are not divided by shares are only Perum.Keywords: Harmonization, Bankruptcy, Subsidiary The State.Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan dan menganalisis harmonisasi undang-undang kepailitan anak perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN). Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tidak memberikan penjelasan mengenai anak perusahaan BUMN sehingga diperlukan harmonisasi peraturan perundang-undangan mengenai kepailitan anak perusahaan BUMN.            Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Data yang digunakan dengan data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan badan hukum tersier. Untuk analis data dilakukan dengan metode analisis yuridis kualitif.Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh adalah harmonisasi peraturan perundang – undangan UU Kepailitan dan PKPU No. 37 Tahun 2004 Terhadap UU BUMN No. 19 Tahun 2003 dalam kaitannya kepailitan anak perusahaan BUMN bahwa anak perusahaan BUMN dapat dipailitkan oleh selain Menteri Keuangan karena dalam Pasal 2 ayat (5) UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 mengenai BUMN bergerak di bidang publik yakni tidak terbagi oleh saham dengan diharmonisasikan dengan Pasal 1 ayat (4) No. 19 Tahun 2003 BUMN yang tidak terbagi oleh saham hanya Perum.Kata kunci: Harmonisasi, Kepailitan, Anak Perusahaan BUMN.
PUMP AND DUMP CRIMINAL OVERVIEW ACCORDING TO CAPITAL MARKET LAW NO. 8 YEAR 1995 Rinaldi Agusta Fahlevie; Erita Oktasari; Bernadete Nurmawati; Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan; Johand Aldo Dimalouw
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (736.33 KB) | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v5i1.547

Abstract

This study aims to look at the Juridical Review of the Pump and Dump crime in capital market transactions on the Indonesia Stock Exchange based on the Capital Market Law. The main problem that the author discusses and analyzes in this research is the form of the Pump and Dump crime in capital market transactions on the Indonesia Stock Exchange based on the Capital Market Law and the proof of the Pump & Dump crime in the capital market (Case Study of TAXI and LUCK Issuers). The research method is a normative legal research method with a law approach and a case approach. Based on the analysis and provisions of the Capital Market Law, the author concludes that the Pump and Dump crime in capital market transactions on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, can be seen in its form based on certain patterns and methods. The form of the pump and dump pattern and method is in accordance with the elements of market manipulation as stipulated in the provisions of Articles 90 to 93 of the Capital Market Law. To prove that a pump and dump crime has occurred, evidence can be used as regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code.
Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Akta Autentik Yang Berindikasi Tindak Pidana Dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Masyarakat Yuliana Yuliana; Ismail Ismail; Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 5 (2024): September: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v1i5.432

Abstract

This research examines the liability of notaries for authentic deeds under the UUJN. While the UUJN does not specifically regulate criminal sanctions for notaries, the Criminal Code can be applied. Violations by notaries can lead to lawsuits against the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. The UUJN regulates the guidance and supervision of notaries by the Notary Supervisory Council and MKN. The primary focus of this research is the final decision of the Regional Notary Supervisory Council regarding administrative sanctions as outlined in Article 73 of the UUJN. The research methodology employed is a normative juridical legal research approach. The legal materials utilized in this research include primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the research indicate that the legal protection efforts of the community, particularly those who feel harmed by notaries in the context of notarial acts that indicate criminal acts, are carried out through a form of reactive protection, namely the filing of complaints with the Notary Supervisory Panel. The evidence presented to the Regional Notary Supervisory Panel, the district courts in civil cases for compensation and law enforcement officials (Police) in criminal cases, demonstrates the existence of evidence that can be used to support claims of criminal acts by Notaries. However, the Decision of the Regional Notary Supervisory Panel only imposes Administrative Decisions on Notaries who indicate criminal acts with verbal or written warnings.
Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Carding Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Dalam Pembangunan Hukum Tindak Pidana Siber (Cybernetics) Unzur Jefri Tambunan; Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan; Dewi Iryani
Jurnal Gagasan Hukum Vol. 6 No. 02 (2024): JURNAL GAGASAN HUKUM
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Universitas Lancang Kuning

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31849/jgh.v6i02.21830

Abstract

Tindak Pidana Carding atau credit card fraud (penipuan kartu kredit) memiliki permasalahan yang serius baik dalam penanggulangannya maupun kerugian yang ditimbulkan.Penipuan kartu kredit) dapat diartikan sebagai perbuatan seseorang yang bukan pemilik kartu kredit. Kejahatancarding merupakan kejahatan di dunia maya yang memanfaatkan teknologi internet sebagai sarana utama untuk mengakses secara tidak sah suatu sistem sebuah website untuk mendapatkan data-data para nasabah kartu kredit. Pertanyaan penelitian ini adalah bagaimana pengaturantindak pidana cardingdi Indonesia pasca berlakunya UU ITE? dan bagaimana penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana carding di Indonesia menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik? Metode penelitian yang dilakukan dalam penelitian hukum ini adalah yuridis normative.Hasil penelitiannya adalah bahwa kejahatan cardingdiatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dalam Pasal 30, 32, 34 ayat (1), dan 35. Sanksi pidananya ditegaskan dalam Pasal 45-Pasal 52 dan juga ada beberapa pasal dalam KUHP yang mengkriminalisasi cyber crime, yaitu Pasal 362, 363, dan 378 KUHP yaitu tentang pencurian dan penipuan. Penegakan hukum terhadap kejahatan cardingada dua cara yaitu, penegakan hukum secara penal (represif) yang dilaksanakan oleh kepolisian atau instansi yang terkait setelah terciptanya tindakan pidana dengan cara penjatuhan sanksi pidana, dan penegakan hukum secara non penal (preventif) yang melakukan pencegahan yang dilakukan sebelum kejahatan itu terjadi,
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Debitur dalam Sistem Pinjaman Financial Technology (Peer to Peer Lending) Fajar Muazamsyah; Didik Suhariyanto; Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v6i3.5774

Abstract

The development of digital transformation technology requires the banking industry in the banking financial sector to innovate by combining digital technology with customer communication, a technology-based product called financial technology. This development is of course beneficial for the banking financial service system, but on the other hand it creates legal problems. The problems discussed in this study are First, what is the legal protection for debtors in the financial technology lending system (Peer to peer lending). Second, how is law enforcement in the financial technology lending system (peer to peer lending). The research method used is normative juridical law research with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. Legal materials in this study are divided into three sources of legal materials, namely primary, secondary and tertiary data. The results of the study show that debtors get legal protection, both preventive and repressive protection. Protection of preventive protection provided by the government with the aim of preventing before the occurrence of violations in the Peer to-peer lending financial technology transaction system. By providing a regulatory provision in both preventive and repressive protection efforts. The government's steps in preventive legal protection Peer to peer lending include service transparency, fraud prevention and the reliability of service systems and protection systems for personal data. Furthermore, regarding risk mitigation, system governance, education, limits on lending funds, First, repressive protection, handling of legal protection by the General court and by the Administrative Court in Indonesia. Second, government agencies which are administrative appeal institutions. Administrative sanctions in the form of fines, business restrictions, and revocation of activity permits. Law Enforcement in the Financial Technology Loan System through the application of administrative, civil and criminal law. Administrative law enforcement in the form of fines, restrictions on business activities and license revocation. Then, civil law enforcement through internal dispute resolution (IDR), Alternative Dispute Resolution (LAPS), as well as through general courts. While the enforcement of criminal law with criminal law procedures and criminal procedural law. On the other hand, the legal structure of OJK cooperates with law enforcement agencies in collaboration with Bank Indonesia, Polri, Kominfo and the Ministry of Cooperatives.