Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 10 Documents
Search

Patent as Object of Fiduciary Guarantee in Banking Credit Practices Bernadete Nurmawati; Dewi Iryani; Tarmudi Tarmudi
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 5, No 3 (2022): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute August
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v5i3.6142

Abstract

Intellectual property is interesting to study since it has a very important role in the advancement of the economy in this era of globalization. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) are rights that arise from the results of the human brain's thinking that produce a product or process that is useful for the community. IPR includes intangible movable objects as regulated in article 499 of the Civil Code. This intangible object is the result of human thought and the object of ownership is a movable object that can be transferred to another party so that it can be used as a fiduciary guarantee as regulated in Law no. 13 of 2016 concerning Patents (Patent Law). Article 108 paragraph 1 states that "Patent rights can be used as objects of fiduciary guarantee". However, patent rights as objects of fiduciary guarantee in a bank's loan practice are currently unavailable due to obstacles in its implementation. There is no special Asset Appraisal Agency that assesses the economic value of patent rights so that it can be used as a credit guarantee. This makes it difficult for patents to be used as a fiduciary guarantee. To realize patents as objects of fiduciary guarantee, firm and detailed juridical support is needed regarding IPR assets as objects of bank credit guarantees. The valuation of patented assets must be supported by the Patent Regulations protected by the Bank Loan Guarantee and the need for legal access under the Bank Indonesia Regulations to support the patents that are protected by the Trustee Guarantee. So there should be an appraisal agency that can assess a patent right so that it can improve the people's economy and advance the national economy.
HARMONISASI UNDANG – UNDANG KEPAILITAN ANAK PERUSAHAAN BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA Maharani Putri Handayani; Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan; Dewi Iryani
SETARA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2022): SETARA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Bung Karno

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59017/setara.v3i1.252

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to examine and analyze the harmonization of bankruptcy laws of state-owned enterprises (BUMN) subsidiaries. Law No. 37 of 2004 does not provide an explanation regarding SOE subsidiaries so that it is necessary to harmonize laws and regulations regarding the bankruptcy of SOE subsidiaries.The method used in this research is normative legal research. The data used are secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal entities. To analyze the data, it is done by qualitative juridical analysis method.The results of the research obtained are the harmonization of the laws and regulations of the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU No. 37 of 2004 Against SOE Law No. 19 of 2003 in finding the bankruptcy of a subsidiary of a BUMN that a subsidiary of a BUMN can be bankrupted by other than the Minister of Finance because in Article 2 paragraph (5) of Law no. 37 of 2004 concerning SOEs operating in the public sector, which is not divided by shares, is harmonized with Article 1 paragraph (4) No. 19 of 2003 SOEs that are not divided by shares are only Perum.Keywords: Harmonization, Bankruptcy, Subsidiary The State.Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan dan menganalisis harmonisasi undang-undang kepailitan anak perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN). Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tidak memberikan penjelasan mengenai anak perusahaan BUMN sehingga diperlukan harmonisasi peraturan perundang-undangan mengenai kepailitan anak perusahaan BUMN.            Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Data yang digunakan dengan data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan badan hukum tersier. Untuk analis data dilakukan dengan metode analisis yuridis kualitif.Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh adalah harmonisasi peraturan perundang – undangan UU Kepailitan dan PKPU No. 37 Tahun 2004 Terhadap UU BUMN No. 19 Tahun 2003 dalam kaitannya kepailitan anak perusahaan BUMN bahwa anak perusahaan BUMN dapat dipailitkan oleh selain Menteri Keuangan karena dalam Pasal 2 ayat (5) UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 mengenai BUMN bergerak di bidang publik yakni tidak terbagi oleh saham dengan diharmonisasikan dengan Pasal 1 ayat (4) No. 19 Tahun 2003 BUMN yang tidak terbagi oleh saham hanya Perum.Kata kunci: Harmonisasi, Kepailitan, Anak Perusahaan BUMN.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Upah Pekerja Akibat Perusahaan Telah Dinyatakan Pailit Arbi Dalimunthe; Didik Suhariyanto; Dewi Iryani
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): September : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v2i3.3972

Abstract

Bankruptcy is a legal process in which the assets of an insolvent debtor are managed and settled by a curator under the supervision of a judge. This research discusses the legal certainty for workers when the company goes bankrupt, as well as the legal protection for their rights. It employs normative legal research methods and qualitative analysis of secondary data, which includes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of this study indicate that workers' rights must be prioritized in cases of company bankruptcy, in accordance with Constitutional Court Decision No. 67/PUU-XI/2013. In such instances, unpaid workers' wages must take precedence over other creditors, including the state and government agencies. Curators play an important role in protecting workers' rights during the insolvency process, and workers have the right to sue if their rights are not met.
Tanggung Jawab Hukum Penilai Publik Untuk Ganti Kerugian Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Kepentingan Umum Yang Berkepastian Hukum Ummi Habsyah; Hartana Hartana; Dewi Iryani
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 5 (2024): September: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v1i5.441

Abstract

Land has an economic value to its owner. When land is acquired in the public interest, the loss is determined by the KJPP Land Appraiser, who is responsible for the appraisal. Violations of the appraiser's duties are subject to administrative and/or criminal sanctions. The valuation includes land, surface and underground areas, buildings, equipment and related objects. The results of the appraisal become the basis for deliberations to determine the compensation, and the entitled party may take legal action in case of disagreement. This research uses a normative juridical method with a Legislation, Case, and Concept approach. The data used are secondary data (primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials) and primary data as support. Data analysis is carried out using the normative juridical analysis method. The results of the study show that there are several problems in land acquisition, such as different results of object value assessment and regulatory inconsistencies, which lead to unequal bargaining positions. Conclusion: Appraisers are responsible for conducting appraisals according to established procedures. Researchers hope that the valuation results can be accounted for and in accordance with the law, as well as special rules for the Public Appraisal Profession and Supreme Court Regulations related to compensation procedures in land acquisition.
Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Carding Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Dalam Pembangunan Hukum Tindak Pidana Siber (Cybernetics) Unzur Jefri Tambunan; Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan; Dewi Iryani
Jurnal Gagasan Hukum Vol. 6 No. 02 (2024): JURNAL GAGASAN HUKUM
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Universitas Lancang Kuning

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31849/jgh.v6i02.21830

Abstract

Tindak Pidana Carding atau credit card fraud (penipuan kartu kredit) memiliki permasalahan yang serius baik dalam penanggulangannya maupun kerugian yang ditimbulkan.Penipuan kartu kredit) dapat diartikan sebagai perbuatan seseorang yang bukan pemilik kartu kredit. Kejahatancarding merupakan kejahatan di dunia maya yang memanfaatkan teknologi internet sebagai sarana utama untuk mengakses secara tidak sah suatu sistem sebuah website untuk mendapatkan data-data para nasabah kartu kredit. Pertanyaan penelitian ini adalah bagaimana pengaturantindak pidana cardingdi Indonesia pasca berlakunya UU ITE? dan bagaimana penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana carding di Indonesia menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik? Metode penelitian yang dilakukan dalam penelitian hukum ini adalah yuridis normative.Hasil penelitiannya adalah bahwa kejahatan cardingdiatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dalam Pasal 30, 32, 34 ayat (1), dan 35. Sanksi pidananya ditegaskan dalam Pasal 45-Pasal 52 dan juga ada beberapa pasal dalam KUHP yang mengkriminalisasi cyber crime, yaitu Pasal 362, 363, dan 378 KUHP yaitu tentang pencurian dan penipuan. Penegakan hukum terhadap kejahatan cardingada dua cara yaitu, penegakan hukum secara penal (represif) yang dilaksanakan oleh kepolisian atau instansi yang terkait setelah terciptanya tindakan pidana dengan cara penjatuhan sanksi pidana, dan penegakan hukum secara non penal (preventif) yang melakukan pencegahan yang dilakukan sebelum kejahatan itu terjadi,
Pidana Seumur Hidup Dalam Sistem Hukum Positif Indonesia Abdul Gani; Dewi Iryani; Gradios Nyoman Tio
Jurnal Gagasan Hukum Vol. 6 No. 02 (2024): JURNAL GAGASAN HUKUM
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Universitas Lancang Kuning

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31849/jgh.v6i02.24640

Abstract

Pelaksanaan pidana penjara di Indonesia dilaksanakan melalui sistem pemasyarakatan berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 1995 tentang Pemasyarakatan, yang merupakan perubahan ide secara yuridis filosofis dari sistem kepenjaraan menjadi sistem pemasyarakatan. Runusan masalah penelitian ini adalah bagaimana penerapan hukum Pidana seumur hidup dalam hukum positif? dan bagaimana Pidana seumur hidup dalam sistem hukum pidana Nasional? iJenis data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang diperoleh dari data kepustakaan dan perundang-undangan. Dalam penelitian ini dinyatakan bahwa pidana seumur hidup dipandang sebagai pidana sementara waktu dengan tujuan utama pemidanaan yaitu preventif, detterence dan reformatif. Tujuan preventif untuk melindungi masyarakat dengan menempatkan pelaku kejahatan terpisah dari masyarakat. Tujuan menakuti (detterence) untuk menimbulkan rasa takut melakukan kejahatan, baik bagi individual pelaku agar tidak mengulangi perbuatannya maupun bagi publik sebagai langkah panjang. Pembalasan dalam bentuk pengecualian apapun tidak akan membawa keseimbangan kembali, terkecuali hanya untuk memuaskan nafsu dendam atau membuat tenram bagi pihak yang dirugikan atas peerbuatan pelaku, dengan dipidananya pelaku atau penjahat maka akan merasa mendapat imbalan penderitaan atas nestapa.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM KEPAILITAN TERHADAP PEMBELI UNIT APARTEMEN YANG BERIKTIKAD BAIK Dewi Iryani; Aryasuta Faharsyah Setiawan
El-Iqthisadi Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Uin Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/el-iqthisady.v7i1.58673

Abstract

Abstrak Hukum kepailitan dianggap berlaku ketika negosiasi damai atau restrukturisasi utang tidak berhasil, tetapi undang-undang kepailitan saat ini tidak memuat penjelasan rinci tentang faktor kepailitan atau kewajiban debitur dalam kaitannya dengan situasi keuangannya, tetapi hanya kriteria debitur untuk tidak membayar. Ketika pengembang mengajukan kebangkrutan, seringkali mengakibatkan kerugian yang signifikan bagi kreditur, terutama konsumen yang telah membayar unit rumah tetapi tidak dapat menerima penggantian melalui proses pemeliharaan, menciptakan ketidakpastian hukum yang berdampak negatif pada pembeli jika pengembang mengajukan kebangkrutan. Konsumen yang telah membayar berdasarkan Kontrak Penjualan yang Mengikat (PPJB) berisiko kehilangan sumber daya keuangan atau memperoleh saham. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pedoman deskriptif analitis dan didasarkan pada data sekunder dari studi bibliografi, yang meliputi materi hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepastian hukum merupakan kebutuhan mendasar untuk memastikan perlindungan hak asasi manusia dan menciptakan stabilitas sosial, dan bahwa Undang-Undang No 37/2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Utang (PKPU) perlu direvisi untuk memastikan perlindungan yang memadai bagi konsumen bonafide saat membeli rumah. Kata Kunci: Kebangkrutan, Kepastian Hukum, UU No 37/2004.   Abstract Bankruptcy law is implemented as a final solution when peaceful negotiations or debt restructuring efforts fail, however the existing bankruptcy regulations do not provide detailed explanations regarding the causal factors of bankruptcy or debtor obligations toward their financial condition, but merely establish the criteria that the debtor has ceased making payments. When apartment developers experience bankruptcy, this often causes significant losses to creditors, particularly consumers who have made payments for apartment units but cannot obtain fund recovery through the curator process, thereby creating legal uncertainty that disadvantages buyers when developers become bankrupt. Consumers who have completed payments based on Sale and Purchase Binding Agreements (PPJB) face the risk of losing their financial investment or property units they have purchased. This research employs a normative juridical method with descriptive analytical specifications and relies on secondary data sourced from library studies encompassing primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The research results indicate that legal certainty is a fundamental requirement to guarantee the protection of human rights and create social stability, therefore revision of the Bankruptcy Law and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) No. 37 of 2004 is necessary to provide adequate protection for good faith consumers in apartment unit purchase transactions. Keywords: Bankruptcy, Legal Certainty, Law No. 37/2004.
Implikasi Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Persetujuan Peningkatan Produksi Kontrak Karya dalam Penegakan Keadilan pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Mohamad Rizki Irmansyah; Didik Suhariyanto; Dewi Iryani
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v6i2.1715

Abstract

Environmental pollution occurs when the cycle of matter in the living environment changes so that the balance in terms of structure and function is disturbed. Imbalances in the structure and function of the material cycle occur due to natural processes or also due to human actions. In this modern age, there are many human activities or actions to fulfill biological needs and technological needs, thus causing a lot of environmental pollution. If there is a problem regarding environmental destruction or damage to the environment, it is almost certain that human activity is the main cause.The research method used is the Normative Juridical research type, in accordance with the objectives the author wants to achieve, the methodology in designing the thesis research uses two types of approaches, namely the Statutory Approach and the Conceptual Approach. The Statute Approach is an approach carried out by examining all laws with the concept of law. The implications of the state administration's decision to approve increased production of work contracts, provisions containing the principle of absolute responsibility, cannot yet be implemented, considering that Article 21 of Law No. 23 of 1997 concerning Environmental Management with implementing regulations that have not been made has resulted in lawsuits in environmental cases. in courts requesting the application of the principle of absolute responsibility is often not accepted.Enforcement of environmental law through civil procedures is regulated in Chapter either based on an agreement between the parties or using the services of a mediator and/or arbitrator. A lawsuit via litigation (court action) can only be pursued if efforts to resolve the dispute outside of court are unsuccessful.
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR CAR RENTAL BUSINESS ACTORS AGAINST RENTERERS WHO ARE IN DEFAULT (Study of Decision Number 32/Pdt.G/2019/PN Btl and Decision Number 1065/Pdt/2023/PT.DKI) Natassya Fachrina; Dewi Iryani; G. Nyoman Tio Rae
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): September
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i5.4101

Abstract

The development of the car rental business in Indonesia faces significant legal challenges, particularly related to default by renters. This study aims to analyze the legal protection available to car rental businesses when facing renters who default, by examining two court decisions: Decision Number 32/Pdt.G/2019/PN Btl and Decision Number 1065/Pdt/2023/PT.DKI. The research method used is normative juridical with a case-based approach and a statutory approach. The results show that legal protection for car rental businesses can be achieved through preventive and repressive channels. Preventive protection is carried out through the creation of a comprehensive written agreement, while repressive protection can be achieved through a lawsuit for default or unlawful acts. Both decisions analyzed show that the courts provide legal protection to business owners by punishing renters who default by paying compensation. However, the implementation of this legal protection still faces obstacles, particularly in terms of executing decisions and recovering losses. This study recommends the need to strengthen regulations specifically for the car rental business and improve guarantee mechanisms that can protect the interests of business owners.
Perlindungan terhadap Satwa Endemik yang Dilindungi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1990 Tentang Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Hayati dan Ekosistemnya Prasetyo Hadi; Didik Suhariyanto; Dewi Iryani
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v6i1.1672

Abstract

Animal protection must be developed as a counterweight to the democratic system developed by humans. The concept of animal protection can be understood in the context of a balanced relationship between God, nature and humans. So far, power relations have only been seen as a human problem. In democracy, only humans, called the people, are made the starting point and center of attention, which will lead to massive exploitation of nature.The research method used is the Normative Juridical research type, in accordance with the objectives the author wants to achieve, the methodology in designing the thesis research uses two types of approaches, namely the Statutory Approach and the Conceptual Approach. The Statute Approach is an approach carried out by examining all laws with the concept of law. Authority for Endemic Animals Protected in the Conservation of Biological Natural Resources and Their Ecosystems, Based on the material regulated in this Law, Law no. 5 of 1990 contains fundamental weaknesses, namely: It only categorizes types into protected and unprotected. For protected species, the provisions regarding sanctions for violations are clearly regulated and adequate.Legal Protection of Endemic Animals which are Protected Based on Law Number 5 of 1990 Conservation of Living Natural Resources and Their Ecosystems, Regulations that regulate the balance between utilization and balancing must also be balanced. It must always be controlled to maintain forest stability