Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.286
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Syntax Transformation Nusantara Hasana Journal Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Student Research Journal Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
I Nyoman Suandika
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HASIL KARYA ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK CIPTA DI INDONESIA Cokorda Gede Yasnu Suwargita; I Nyoman Suandika; I Gusti Agung Ika Laksmi Mahadewi
Nusantara Hasana Journal Vol. 5 No. 7 (2025): Nusantara Hasana Journal, December 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Nusantara Hasana Berdikari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59003/nhj.v5i7.1813

Abstract

The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents new challenges to the Indonesian legal system, particularly in relation to copyright protection. On the one hand, AI is capable of producing creative works that resemble human creations; on the other hand, its existence raises fundamental questions regarding the legal status of such works and the applicable copyright protection. This condition demonstrates the urgency of comprehensive regulation to ensure a balance between technological innovation and legal protection. The purpose of this study is to analyze the urgency of establishing specific regulations on AI to address potential copyright infringements in Indonesia. The research employs a normative juridical method, using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Data sources are obtained through library research on national laws and regulations, international legal instruments, and relevant academic literature. The results of the study indicate that existing regulations in Indonesia, such as the Copyright Law and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law), still contain vague norms and have not explicitly accommodated the phenomenon of AI-based works. A comparison with regulations in the European Union through the AI Act highlights the importance of a clear legal framework concerning liability, protection of creative works, and supervisory mechanisms for the use of AI. The conclusion of this study emphasizes that specific regulation on AI in Indonesia is an urgent necessity. Such regulation must be designed to provide legal certainty regarding AI-based works while still ensuring fairness for all segments of society.
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Tugas dan Fungsi Debt Collector Pasca Putusan MK I Nyoman Suwardika; I Nyoman Suandika; Ida Bagus Anggapurana Pidada
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): November : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v1i4.683

Abstract

This research aims to determine the juridical analysis of the duties and functions of Debt Collectors after the Constitutional Court decision and to determine the impact of the post-Constitutional Court Decision on the duties and functions of Debt Collectors. The method used in this research uses the type of research used is a type of juridical analysis approach. The results of the research show that the implementation of the execution of fiduciary guarantees has undergone a change following the decision of the Constitutional Court, which is the term "executorial power" in Article 15 Paragraph (2) and the decision. court which has legal force remains contrary to the 1945 Constitution and does not have binding legal force as long as it is not interpreted as a lack of agreement in the event of a breach of contract and the debtor objects to voluntarily surrendering the object which is a fiduciary guarantee, then the implementation of legal procedures for implementing fiduciary guarantees must be carried out and likewise This is the case with the execution of court decisions that have permanent legal force. On the other hand, if a default agreement has been agreed between the debtor and creditor at the beginning of the agreement, the finance company can directly carry out its own execution without going to court. So that after the decision of the Constitutional Court, creditors can no longer carry out unilateral execution of fiduciary collateral objects, but must go through the District Court, unless there is a breach of contract agreement at the beginning of the agreement between the debtor and creditor, and the debtor voluntarily hands over the fiduciary collateral object to the creditor.
Hakim Pengganti Mahkamah Konstitusi I Nyoman Suandika; Komang Edy Dharma Saputra; Ni Made Rit Meidyana
Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Juni: Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mandub.v4i2.3248

Abstract

Article 47 of the Constitutional Court Law stipulates that a Constitutional Court decision has permanent legal force upon its pronouncement in a plenary session open to the public. This assertion raises the question of why legal remedies are not possible to correct a Constitutional Court decision, should an error occur. To achieve legal certainty, will the erroneous decision be enforceable indefinitely? The research question is: What is the rationale underlying the granting of permanent legal force to a Constitutional Court decision upon its pronouncement in a plenary session open to the public? This research employs normative legal research, employing statutory, conceptual, historical, and comparative approaches. The legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The legal materials were collected through document study. The legal materials were analyzed using descriptive and analytical techniques. The results of the study show that, the rationale underlying the granting of the permanent legal force of the Constitutional Court's decision since after it has been pronounced in a public plenary session is because the case submitted to the Constitutional Court is a case related to state administration so that it requires a quick decision and is bound by time limits so as not to disrupt the continuity of other state administration agendas. The possibility of a judicial review of the Constitutional Court's decision, viewed from a normative perspective, is not possible because Article 47 of the Constitutional Court Law states that the Constitutional Court's decision is permanent since it is pronounced in a public plenary session, and is further emphasized in the explanation of Article 10 number (1) that it is permanent, meaning that no legal action can be taken. furthermore in the Regulation of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 06/PMK/2005 concerning Guidelines for Proceedings in Cases of Judicial Review. There is no term for judicial review.
Co-Authors A.A Gde Putra Arjawa Agustinus Hitri Liberty D. Kalumbang Cokorda Gede Yasnu Suwargita Deli Bunga Saravistha Erikson Sihotang Gede Yoga Satrya Wibawa I Gusti Agung Ika Laksmi Mahadewi I Nyoman Ari Franthika Laksana Putra Parwata I Nyoman Suartha Adhi Putra I Nyoman Sugiarta I Nyoman Suwardika I Putu Yoga Palgunadi Putra I Wayan Mahesa Juli Susanto Ida Bagus Anggapurana Pidada Ignas Riez Bria Kadek Dedy Suryana Komang Edy Dharma Saputra Melkianus Umbu Deta Ni Made Rit Meidyana Ni Putu Sintya Lestari Pande Made Briyanco Bali Sonia Surya Hanim Lubis