Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Didaktika Dwija Indria
Tri Budiharto
UNS
Education

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Studi komparasi antara model pembelajaran think talk write dan model pembelajaran direct instruction terhadap keterampilan menulis teks eksplanasi ditinjau dari motivasi belajar pada peserta didik kelas V sekolah dasar Dwi Agus Ariyanto; Slamet Slamet; Tri Budiharto
Didaktika Dwija Indria Vol 7, No 3 (2019): Didaktika Dwija Indria
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/ddi.v7i3.32108

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this research is to find out of (1) the differences in explanation text writing skill between students that learned by Think Talk Write learning models and Direct Instruction learning models (2) knowing the differences in students who have high and low learning motivation towards explanation text writing skill (3) the effect interaction of leraning-models and leraning motivation toward explanation text writing skill. The population of the research was all of students grade V SD N in Laweyan District Surakarta City. Grade V SD N Tegalsari and grade V SD N Bumi 1 were selected as the sample through cluster random sampling. This research use experimental method with 2x2 factorial design. Data were collected by means of questionnaire for students learning motivation data and test for the data of students explanation text writing skill. Those data were analyzed with two-way Anava test with different content of cell with level of significance 0,05. The result showed that, (1) there were differences in explanation text writing skill between students who taught by Think Talk Write and Direct Instruction learning model (FA = 4,15 > Ftabel = 4,00) (2) there were difference in explanation text writing skill between students who have high motivation and low motivation (FB = 4,05 > Ftabel = 4,00) (3) there was no effect interaction between the learning-model and learning-motivation toward explanation text writing skill (FAB = 0,41 < Ftabel = 4,00).Keywords : Think Talk Write, Direct Instruction, explanation text writing skill, elementary school
Keterampilan berbicara ditinjau dari penguasaan kosakata dan sikap percaya diri peserta didik kelas V sekolah dasar Gayatri Candra Kirana; Slamet Slamet; Tri Budiharto
Didaktika Dwija Indria Vol 10, No 5 (2022): Didaktika Dwija Indria
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/ddi.v10i5.51555

Abstract

Abstract. The purpose of this research was (1) vocabulary mastery wuth speaking skills, (2) selft-confident  with speaking skill, (3) vocabulary mastery and self-confident with the speaking skills elementary school at grade 5TH  Ahmad Yani Cluster, Cilacap Selatan District, Cilacap City. This study uses a quantitative correlation reaearch ,ethod. Sampling using cluster random sampling with a population  elemtary school at grade 5TH students Ahmad Yani Cluster. The data analysis techniques used simple correlastion analysis and multiple correlastion assisted by Ms.Excel. The result of the simple correlation analysis indicate that the hypothesis states that there is a significant and positive reliationship between vocabulary mastery with speaking skilss. Based on the data analysis, it can be conclude of vocabulary mastery and speaking skills ry1 (0.798), the coefficient of the correlation was tested with the t test, the result tcount (11.011)> ttable (1.995) showing a significant correlation between the self confident and speaking skils ry2 (0.9129), the coefficient of the correlation was tested with the t test, the rusult tcount (18.580)> ttable (1.995) showing a significant correlation between both the vocabulary mastery and self-confident together with speaking skills ry12 (0.856). the coefficient the F test obtained Fcount = 92.907real level α = 0.05, with df = 68 obtained Ftable = 3.131, then Fcount > Ftable.
Co-Authors Dwi Agus Ariyanto Gayatri Candra Kirana Sandra Bayu Kurniawan Siska Tri Agustin Slamet Slamet