Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi Studies in English Language and Education
Syofyan Hadi
Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kerinduan pada Tanah Air dalam Antologi Puisi ‘Āsyiq Min Falisṭīn Karya Mahmoud Darwish (Analisis Semiotika Riffaterre) Suharsono Suharsono; Ivan Adilla; Syofyan Hadi
Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi Vol 23, No 1 (2023): Februari
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/jiubj.v23i1.3226

Abstract

Anthology of poetry Mahmoud Darwish's work Āsyiq min Falisṭīn is a poem about longing, which shows the poet's love for his homeland. On the other hand, the poetry in the anthology also describes the condition of the poet who is in prison, isolated and without a family. To discuss the poetry anthology above, this thesis utilizes the semiotic theory developed by Michael Riffaterre. There are three problems studied in this thesis, they are: 1) What is the form of indirect expression in the poetry anthology of Āsyiq min Falisṭīn by Mahmoud Darwish, 2) What is the meaning contained in the anthology of poetry Āsyiq min Falisṭīn Mahmoud Darwish's work with heuristic and hermeneutic readings, 3) How are the matrices, models, and variants in the poetry anthology of Āsyiq min Falisṭīn by Mahmoud Darwish. The method used in this study is a qualitative descriptive that describes the results of research using Riffaterre's semiotics method. This research concludes the following. First, the indirect form of expression in the poetry anthology Mahmoud Darwish's work Āsyiq min Falisṭīn is in the form of changing meaning, distorting meaning, and creating meaning. Second, through heuristic and hermeneutic reading, it can be concluded that the poems in the anthology above describe the poet's longing for his land of Palestine. Third, the matrix, model, and variant in the poetry anthology Mahmoud Darwish's work Āsyiq min Falisṭīn shows the relationship between the themes of each stanza of his poetry.
Lexical cohesion analysis on articles of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in Arabic and English online newspapers Syofyan Hadi; Hetti Waluati Triana; Tafiati Tafiati; Wartiman Wartiman; Reflinaldi Reflinaldi
Studies in English Language and Education Vol 11, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/siele.v11i1.30977

Abstract

Discourse studies on the Russia-Ukraine conflict have been conducted in the past few years, especially in newspapers. Comparative studies on the media in several countries have been widely carried out; however, none so far focused on comparing Arabic and English newspapers. Thus, this article aimed to examine the lexical cohesion of Arabic and English newspapers to identify each newspapers tendency to represent the conflict. Aljazeera and The Guardian newspaper were designated as subjects of the study, in which five opinions published in March 2022 by each newspaper were purposively selected as data sources. Data was collected through internet archival documentation techniques and analysed by referring to the lexical cohesion theory framework proposed by Halliday and Matthiessen (2013). The results showed that repetition was the dominant cohesive device used in Aljazeera, whereas repetition and collocation were the most used lexical cohesion devices in The Guardian. The use of these lexical cohesion devices showed that Aljazeera took a neutral position in representing conflicts and actors. On the other hand, The Guardian tended to side with Ukraine while framing Russia and Putin negatively. Differences in these tendencies were due to the differences in interests. Aljazeera could stay impartial because Qatar had no political interests in the conflict. By contrast, The Guardian was positioning itself against Russia and Putin because Britain had economic and geopolitical interests in the conflict.
Co-Authors Ivan Adilla Reflinaldi Reflinaldi Suharsono Suharsono Tafiati Tafiati Triana, Hetti Waluati Wartiman Wartiman