Hilda Permata
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

KARAKTERISTIK TES PENALARAN ILMIAH MATERI MOMENTUM DAN IMPULS BERDASARKAN TEORI RESPON BUTIR Hilda Permata; Taufik Ramlan Ramalis; Ida Kaniawati
WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika) Vol 5, No 2 (2020): WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika) 2020
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (344.977 KB) | DOI: 10.17509/wapfi.v5i2.27547

Abstract

ABSTRAK Penalaran ilmiah merupakan perangkat keterampilan penalaran dasar yang pada umumnya diperlakukan bagi peserta didik untuk melakukan penyelidikan ilmiah. Berdasarkan studi pendahuluan, pada pelaksaan evaluasi pembelajaran guru belum mengembangkan instrumen tes yang mampu mengukur penalaran peserta didik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkarakteristik tes penalaran ilmiah. Data dianalisis menggunakan teori respon butir 3PL, model ini dipilih karena memiliki nilai fungsi informasi paling tinggi 6,095. Desain penelitian menggunakan concurrent embedded yaitu metode penelitian yang menggabungkan antara metode kualitatif dengan metode kuantitatif pada materi momentum dan impuls. Partisipan yang terlibat 100 peserta didik dari SMAN 15 Bandung. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah bentuk tes penalaran ilmiah berupa tes tertulis pilihan berganda yang berjumlah 15 butir soal. Hasil analisis tes penalaran ilmiah dapat dikatakan valid baik berdasarkan analisis menggunakan validitas isi Aiken V dan analisis parameter logistik. Hasil analisis kurva karakteristik tes menunjukkan bahwa tes penalaran ilmiah memiliki nilai parameter daya pembeda (a) sebesar 1,19 yang artinya berkategori baik, nilai parameter tingkat kesukaran tes (b) sebesar -0,063 yang artinya berada dikategori sedang, dan nilai parameter faktor tebakan semu (c) sebesar 0,035 yang artinya dalam kategori baik. Tes penalaran ilmiah ini memiliki nilai fungsi informasi 6,095 dan SEM (Standard Error of Measurement) sebesar 0,41 dengan estimasi reliabilitas tes penalaran ilmiah berada pada rentang skala -1,08 sampai 2,22 sehingga tes tersebut reliabel mengukur kemampuan rendah sampai tinggi. Kata Kunci: Penalaran Ilmiah; Karakteristik Tes; Respon Teori Butir ABSTRACT Scientific reasoning is a device of basic reasoning skills that are generally treated for students to carry out scientific investigations. Based on the preliminary study, the teacher learning evaluation has not developed a test instrument capable of measuring students' reasoning. This study aims to characterize scientific reasoning tests. Data were analyzed using the 3PL item response theory, this model was chosen because it has the highest information function value of 6.095. The research design uses concurrent embedded, a research method that combines qualitative methods with quantitative methods on the material of momentum and impulse. Participants involved 100 students from SMAN 15 Bandung. The instrument used was a form of scientific reasoning test in the form of a multiple choice written test, totaling 15 items. The results of the analysis of the scientific reasoning test can be said to be valid both based on the analysis using the content validity of Aiken V and logistic parameter analysis. The results of the test characteristic curve analysis show that the scientific reasoning test has a distinguishing power parameter value (a) of 1.19 which means that it is categorized as good, the parameter value of the difficulty level of the test (b) is -0.063 which means it is in the medium category, and the parameter value of the pseudo guess (c) 0.035 which means in the good category. This scientific reasoning test has an information function value of 6.095 and SEM (Standard Error of Measurement) of 0.41 with the estimated reliability of the scientific reasoning test in the scale range of -1.08 to 2.22 so that the test reliably measures low to high abilities. Keywords: Scientific Reasoning; Test Characteristics; Item Theory Response
PATTERNS OF MISCONCEPTION CHANGE IN STELLAR EVOLUTION UNDER DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION Hilda Permata; Winny Liliawati; Judhistira Aria Utama
Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (August 2025)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jotalp.v10i2.49489

Abstract

This study maps changes in misconceptions about stellar evolution by emphasising three student-level categories: positive, stable, and negative change. Misconceptions in astronomy often persist in definitional concepts and causal relations. A quasi-experimental pretest–posttest design with experimental and control classes was employed. Data were collected using a fifteen-item, four-tier diagnostic; an item was considered understood when both the answer and the written reason were correct. We analysed each student’s total understanding score to classify individual change and then computed class-level proportions. Results show the experimental class was dominated by positive change 62.9%, followed by stable 25.7% and negative 11.4%; the control class showed positive 48.6%, stable 24.3%, and negative 27.0%. These findings indicate that differentiated instruction is more effective in reducing misconceptions at the individual level.