Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ekuilibrium : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Ilmu Ekonomi JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah)
Iskandar Iskandar
Institute of Social Science, Dokuz Eylül University
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
How does the PEN Program Affect the Sustainability of MSMEs: A Case Study in Bantul Nur Andriyani; Huda Kurnia Maulana; Annisa Nur Salam; Frisca Marta Utami; Alivia Nabila Kinasih; Syarif Ardiansyah; Iskandar Iskandar
EKUILIBRIUM : JURNAL ILMIAH BIDANG ILMU EKONOMI Vol 18, No 1 (2023): March
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ekuilibrium.v18i1.2023.pp110-119

Abstract

The Indonesian economy has faced a pandemic for the last two years. The Covid-19 pandemic is the starting point for implementing digital technology for MSMEs. MSMEs and the government maintain the sustainability of MSMEs, which are one of the pillars of the economy. This study aims to analyze the impact of digital technology implementation, human capital and PEN program in maintaining business sustainability directly or through competitive advantage. The object of research is culinary MSMEs in Bantul Yogyakarta Regency. SEM PLS is employed to estimate the primary data by using WARPS PLS 6.0 application. The results revealed that digital technology variables could directly affect business sustainability. Meanwhile, human capital and the PEN program affect business sustainability through competitive advantage. The results suggest government extend the fiscal stimulus.
Contestation on Religious Interpretation in Contemporary Aceh Sharīa: Public Caning in Prison as the Case of Study Husni Mubarrak; Faisal Yahya; Iskandar Iskandar
JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) Vol 22, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31958/juris.v22i2.10258

Abstract

This study aimed to discuss the debate and controversy surrounding interpretations that are considered authoritative about interpreting Sharīa proposition regarding the ta'zīr public caning legal procession in prisons in Aceh, from what was previously held in an open space. The debate occurred and took place in various media, including social media, following the issuance of the 2018 Aceh Governor's Regulation concerning the relocation of the punishment procession. The discussion continued long enough to debate the interpretation which is considered the most valid regarding the necessity of caning for being witnessed by a group of believers (mukmin); the selection of the place where the punishment will be carried out; until the legal reasoning, intent and purpose of the caning punishment itself to be witnessed in public space according to Sharīa, as explicitly stated and interpreted in the Al-Qur’an Surah An-Nur: verse 2. By using literature studies and empirical investigations as the method, this article would like to use synthesis approach for analysis by putting theory “authoritative” and “authoritarianism” as the framework. The research finding shows that certain view which has been popularized through media is supposed as an authoritative interpretation and understood as the “should be” according to sharīa by the public, so that must be imposed of caning and openly witnessed (not in jail) during the formalization of Islamic law in contemporary Aceh.
Co-Authors Alivia Nabila Kinasih Annisa Nur Salam Faisal Yahya Frisca Marta Utami Huda Kurnia Maulana Husni Mubarrak Nur Andriyani Syarif Ardiansyah