Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Restorative Justice
Cavin George Ngilawane
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PEMBAHARUAN SISTEM PERADILAN DI INDONESIA PADA LEMBAGA KEJAKSAAN DALAM FUNGSI PENYIDIKAN Restu Monika Nia Betaubun; Cavin George Ngilawane
Jurnal Restorative Justice Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Jurnal Restorative Justice
Publisher : Musamus University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (333.056 KB) | DOI: 10.35724/jrj.v6i2.4965

Abstract

The central position of the Indonesian Prosecutor's Office in law enforcement in Indonesia, as one of the legal sub-systems that are in an organized and integrated unit, influences and complements each other with other sub-systems to achieve the objectives of the legal system. Judging from the aspect of its authority, the prosecutor has the authority to carry out investigations and prosecutions, but the first part in the function of carrying out investigations, the prosecutor's authority is limited to certain crimes, such as criminal acts of sedition, economic crimes and criminal acts of corruption. In this short paper, the author tries to give a little contribution to the idea of ​​reforming the justice system in Indonesia, especially at the prosecutor's office in the investigative function. The formulation of the problem includes how the system of reforming the prosecutor's office in carrying out the investigation function. The type of legal research used is the type of normative legal research which focuses on the laws and regulations regarding Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia, the approach used is the legal history approach. This approach is to find out the history of the prosecutor's duties as investigators. The results of this study are that in their duties as conducting investigations the prosecutor can conduct investigations if the crimes are complex or the level of proof is difficult, for example crimes in the field of human rights and corruption, and if the prosecutor is given additional authority such as participating in further investigations to act as a prosecutor. In general, if the case is transferred to the court, the author feels that the prosecutor can be responsible for the prosecution of a case in its entirety because from the beginning it was directly involved from the investigation process to the prosecution, and in the investigation process if the prosecutor participates it will eliminate the situation of back and forth between the investigator and the file. public prosecutor.
Pembatasan Nilai Perkara Yang Dapat Diajukan Banding Dan Kasasi Untuk Mewujudkan Asas Peradilan Cepat Sederhana Biaya Ringan Ngilawane, Cavin George; Mote, Herry Hendri Fernando; Fenetiruma, Raymond Paradeys
Jurnal Restorative Justice Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Jurnal Restorative Justice
Publisher : Universitas Musamus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35724/jrj.v7i2.5737

Abstract

Pengadilan sebagai sarana yang banyak dipakai oleh warga negara dalam menyelesaikan masalah tentunya diharapkan dapat menjadi lembaga yang dapat memuaskan keinginan dan kehendak dari warga pencari keadilan. Namun dalam praktiknya di pengadilan seringkali ditemukan hal yang mengganjal dalam sistem peradilan yang tidak efektif dan efisien, penyelesaian perkara memakan waktu bertahun-tahun, proses yang lama, dapat diajukan hukum yang berkepanjangan mulai dari banding, kasasi dan peninjauan kembali, setelah berkekuatan hukum tetap, eksekusi dibenturkan lagi hukum verzet. Selain proses yang lama dan biaya mahal, penyelesaian sengketa melalui litigasi juga menimbulkan penumpukan jumlah perkara di pengadilan. Adagium yang menyatakan peradilan cepat, sedehana dan biaya ringan dirasakan tidak efektif bagi para pencari keadilan di Indonesia. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui peran dari lembaga Makamah Agung untuk mewujudkan asas perdilan cepat, sederhana dan biaya ringan. Penelitian hukum normatif dipilih sebagai jenis penelitian pada penulisan ini dengan data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer dan sekunder menjadi lingkup jenis data yang dikaji. Alat pengumpul data yang digunakan berupa studi kepustakaan dan dalam analisis data dilakukan pendekatan politik hokum. Analisis data menggunakan metode deduktif yang kemudian diuraikan secara deskriptif kualitatif dalam kesimpulannya. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa untuk mengurangi penumpukan perkara perdata di Makamah Agung khusunya yang nilai perkara tertentu (kecil) demi mewujudkan asas peradilan cepat sederhana biaya murah, maka telah dilakukan pembatasan upaya hukum dalam bentuk undang, undang, PERMA dan SEMA, dan MA telah membuat cetak biru untuk melakukan pembatasan nilai perkara yang bisa dilakukan upaya hukum kasasi.
Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Perdata Negara Inggris (Common Law System) Dan Negara Indonesia (Civil Law Sytem) Betaubun, Restu Monika Nia; Ngilawane, Cavin George
Jurnal Restorative Justice Vol 8 No 2 (2024): Jurnal Restorative Justice
Publisher : Universitas Musamus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35724/jrj.v8i2.6452

Abstract

Comparative law in its content clearly requires a comparison of two or more legal systems, two or more legal traditions. In this world we do not find only one legal system, but more than one legal system, namely the Civil Law System and the Common Law System. Furthermore, in this article what will be studied is the comparison of the civil law system of the English Common Law System and the Indonesian Civil Law System. The formulation of the problem in this article is how the civil law system differs between the English Common Law and the Indonesian Civil Law in terms of the structure of the judicial body, the source of procedural law, the judicial process, the presence or absence of a jury system, and the position of judges and lawyers in the judicial process. The legal research method used is normative legal research method. The results obtained are 1) In England civil cases are generally tried in the Country Court for simple cases and the High Court of Justice for complex cases. Appeals are filed at the Court of Appeal while cassations at the UK Supreme Court. In Indonesia, criminal and civil cases are tried in the District Court, appeals to the High Court and cassations to the Supreme Court. 2) The sources of English law are jurisprudence, statute law, custom, and reason. Indonesian sources of law are legislation, custom, treaties, jurisprudence, and doctrine. 3) In both the UK and Indonesia the first trial is an peaceful attempt, the difference is that in the UK it is presided over by a former barrister or solicitor while in Indonesia it is presided over by a judge. 4) The UK generally does not recognize the jury system, except in complex criminal and civil cases, while Indonesia does not recognize the jury system. 5) In England the judge plays an active role in the trial, while in Indonesia the judge is passive. 6) In England lawyers are divided into two, namely solicitors and barristers, while Indonesia does not recognize two divisions of lawyers. Keywords: comparative law sytem, common law, civil law
Co-Authors Betaubun, Restu Monika Nia Fenetiruma, Raymond Paradeys Herry Hendri Fernando Mote