Habibatullah, Afifa Intifadha
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Meta-Analysis: Effect of Endometriosis and Intrauterine Device Contraceptive on Ectopic Pregnancy Habibatullah, Afifa Intifadha; Budihastuti, Uki Retno; Widyaningsih, Vitri
Journal of Maternal and Child Health Vol. 7 No. 4 (2022)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (34.793 KB) | DOI: 10.26911/thejmch.2022.07.04.03

Abstract

Background: Ectopic pregnancy is an early complication of pregnancy with high morbidity and mortality. Several studies have examined a history of endometriosis and Intrauterine Device Contraceptive (IUD) use as risk factors for ectopic pregnancy, but have shown mixed results. This study aims to analyze the influence of a history of endometriosis and IUD use on the incidence of ectopic pregnancy based on previous primary studies. Subjects and Method: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis conducted with the PRISMA flow diagram guidelines. The article search process was carried out on the PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, SAGE, JSTOR, and Scopus databases, for articles published from 2005 to 2022. The keywords used were: “Endometriosis” AND “Intrauterine Contraceptive Device” OR “Intrauterine Device” OR “IUD” OR “IUCD” AND “Ectopic Pregnancy” OR “Extrauterine Preg­nancy” OR “Tubal Pregnancy” OR “Pregnancy Outcomes” OR “Pregnancy Complications” AND “Multivariate” OR “Multivariable” OR “Adjusted Odds Ratio” OR “aOR ". Analysis was performed with RevMan 5.3 software. Population: pregnant women of reproductive age. Intervention: endo­metriosis, using the IUD. Comparison: no endometriosis, no IUD use. Outcome: ectopic preg­nancy. Inclusion criteria were full-text observational study articles in English and Indonesian, with ectopic pregnancy as the outcome, analyzed multivariately by including adjusted Odds Ratio/aOR. The analysis was carried out using Review Manager 5.3 software. Results: A total of 11 articles from Asia, Europe, Africa, Australia, and North America were found to meet the criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the overall analysis of 4 articles consisting of 2 cohort studies and 2 case-control studies were that endometriosis increased the risk of ectopic pregnancy 1.39 times higher than without endometriosis (aOR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.16-1.68; p < 0.001). The results of the analysis of 7 case-control study articles showed that the use of IUDs increased the risk of ectopic pregnancy 1.35 times compared to not using the IUD and was not statistically significant (aOR = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.45-4.03; p = 0.590). Conclusion: Endometriosis is a risk factor for ectopic pregnancy. IUD use increased the risk of ectopic pregnancy but was not statistically significant. Keywords: endometriosis, intrauterine device contraceptive, ectopic pregnancy, meta-analysis. Correspondence: Afifa Intifadha Habibatullah. Master’s Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java, Indonesia. Email: alfimakrifatulazizahh@gmail.com. Mobile: +6285375335480.  
Meta Analysis: Health Belief Model on Cervical Cancer Screening among Women of Reproductive Age Habibatullah, Afifa Intifadha; Wulandari, Adetya; Wardani, Aurina Firda Kusuma
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Vol. 6 No. 4 (2021)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers and the most common cause of death in women worldwide. Health Belief Model is a theoretical model that explains the influence of beliefs on a person's health behavior, including cervical cancer prevention behavior. This study aims to determine the effect of the HBM construct on cervical cancer screening behavior among women of childbearing age based on a primary study conducted by previous researchers.Subjects and Method: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis with PICO as follows: Population: women of reproductive age, Intervention: HBM constructs of high perceived severity and high self-efficacy. Comparison: low perceived severity and low self-efficacy. Outcome: cervical cancer screening. The articles used in this study were taken from several databases, namely Google Scholar, Pubmed, SpringerLink, Scopus, and SAGE. The keywords used for the search were “Health Belief Model” AND “Cervical Cancer Screening” OR “Cervical Cancer Test” OR “Pap Smear” OR “Papanicolaou Test” OR “VIA Test” OR “Visual Inspection Acetic-Acid” AND “Adjusted Odds Ratio” OR aOR. Inclusion criteria were full-text articles in English and Indonesian with a cross-sectional study design, population of women of childbearing age, and cervical cancer screening as an outcome, analyzed multivariately by including adjusted Odds Ratio/aOR. Articles were selected using the PRISMA flow diagram and analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 application.Results: A total of 7 cross-sectional studies from Europe, Asia, Africa, and Australia were reviewed and meta-analyzed. The results showed that women of childbearing age with high perceived severity were 1.61 times more likely to have cervical cancer screening than those with low perceived severity (aOR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.11 to 2.34; p = 0.01). The data also showed that women of childbearing age with high self-efficacy were 5.91 times more likely to undergo cervical cancer screening than women with low self-efficacy (aOR= 5.91; 95% CI= 3.25 to 10.75; p<0.001).Conclusion: Severity perception and self-efficacy are predictors for tertiary prevention of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Keywords: health belief model, perceived severity, self-efficacy, cervical cancer screening.Correspondence:Afifa Intifadha Habibatullah. Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java, Indonesia. Email: afifa.pink2@gmail.com. Mobile: 085728146915.Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2021), 06(04): 307-317DOI: https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2021.06.04.05