Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia JIIP (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi
Mustaffa, Aminuddin
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Why Should The Death Penalty Not Be Abolish For Narcotics Crimes? A Case Study In Indonesia Rafsanjani, Ony; Mustaffa, Aminuddin
JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 8 (2022): JIIP (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan)
Publisher : STKIP Yapis Dompu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (759.26 KB) | DOI: 10.54371/jiip.v5i8.813

Abstract

Narcotic crimes are global phenomena that transcend jurisdictional borders. In Indonesia, narcotics crimes attract a different form of punishment, including the death penalty, depending on the nature and gravity of the crimes. This study examines Indonesian law's death penalty sentence for narcotics crimes. It explores the governing principles and current law position relating to this controversial law. This research adopts doctrinal research. The sources of legal materials consist of three, namely, primary, secondary, and tertiary sources of law. The results of this study reveal that the death penalty for the offenders of narcotics crimes under Indonesian law is lawful and justifiable, considering its gravity, nature and impacts. The crimes have caused substantial social, economic and resource loss to the nation and country.
Health Security Policies: A Comparative Study Through Constitutional Frameworks and the Insights of Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco Budiono, Arief; Gulyamov, Said Saidakhrarovich; Nugroho, Heru Santoso Wahito; Al Mamun, Abdullah; Mustaffa, Aminuddin
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 8 Issue 2 (2025) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.10524

Abstract

In Indonesia, the 1945 Constitution mandates the establishment of health social security. Similarly, Section 15 of Article II of the Philippines’ 1987 Constitution asserts that the state has a duty to protect and promote the right to health for its citizens. Bangladesh’s Constitution, while not explicit, recognizes healthcare as a fundamental human right under Articles 15 (which addresses the provision of basic necessities) and 18 (which pertains to public health). Through a classic socio-dogmatic research method—a type of normative legal research—this study interprets how these constitutional provisions are implemented in practice. While Indonesia’s constitution clearloy requires the state to ensure health security, the government often falls short, lacking sufficient financial supports. In the Philippines, health security initiatives are gradually expanding but also suffer from inadequate funding. In contrast, Bangladesh has not prioritized health security, focusing instead on food security without emphasizing health as a state responsibility. Applying Rodriguez-Blanco’s theory reveals that Indonesia’s approach to social security leans towards an insurance model due to its reluctance to allocate adequate funds. In the Philippines, there is progress, albeit slow and underfund, while Bangladesh’s lack of health security development stems from its prioritization of basic food needs over health provisions.
Could Artificial Intelligence be the Subject of Criminal Law? Mahardhika, Vita; Astuti, Pudji; Mustaffa, Aminuddin
Yustisia Vol 12, No 1: April 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v12i1.56065

Abstract

The  use  of  artificial  intelligence  can  increase  productivity  and efficiency in various sectors of life. However, it can also potentially cause legal problems especially criminal law if they result in losses. The subject of law in determining who should be responsible is a separate issue. This research examines whether technology using artificial intelligence can be used as the subject of criminal law so that criminal responsibility can be held. This research is normative juridical research with a statutory, conceptual approach and cases related to artificial intelligence and criminal law issues. The study shows that the ability to analyze and make decisions possesed by artificial intelligence can be indicated as "malicious intent".  Yet, the  concept  of  punishment  for  the  artificial intelligence system  requires  a  unique  formula,  as  the  personality  of  artificial intelligence cannot be equated with the personality of a human or  legal  entity.  The  granting  of  legal  status  through  a  criminal sanction  mechanism  in  the  form  of  machine  deactivation, reprogramming, and the severity of destroying machines is expected to provide future solutions to minimize the risk of criminal acts by artificial intelligence.
Co-Authors Al Mamun, Abdullah Arief Budiono Gulyamov, Said Saidakhrarovich Heru Santoso Wahito Nugroho Mahardhika, Vita PUDJI ASTUTI Rafsanjani, Ony