Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum AIWADTHU: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum
Ronny Soplantila
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Penyuluhan Hukum Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Desa Muhammad Irham; Natanel Lainsamputty; Garciano Nirahua; Ronny Soplantila
AIWADTHU: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Volume 3 Nomor 1, Maret 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law Pattimura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/aiwadthu.v3i1.1157

Abstract

Introduction: The authority possessed by the village government in forming village regulations, in addition to the authority possessed by the village, in the administration of government in the village must be based on mutually established regulations. Counseling carried out in the Poka village with the consideration that if you look at the development of the formation of village regulations, there are still many obstacles faced, namely the limitations of human resources.Purposes of Devotion: Provide legal understanding of Establishment of village regulations in Poka Village, Teluk Ambon District, Ambon City. Method of Devotion: The method used is counseling law to the community, especially to the Poka village government and the Poka village BPD.Results of the Devotion: The implementation of these activities is known that there are many problems in the capacity to form village regulations, this has an impact on the administration of government which is only based on ordinary government management, without any breakthroughs in the formation of village regulations which are the basis for innovation in the development of poka village development.
Akibat Hukum Apabila Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Tidak Melaksanakan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Agus Sujiono; Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae; Ronny Soplantila
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 1, No 4 (2021): Volume 1 Nomor 4, Juni 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law Pattimura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v1i4.613

Abstract

Introduction: The weak implementation of the PTUN decision is due to the absence of an executorial institution and the force to force the implementation of the PTUN decision so that the implementation of the PTUN decision depends on the awareness and initiative of the State Administration Official. Execution of court decisions is the implementation of court decisions by or with the assistance of external parties from the parties. Matters related to execution are the cancellation of the Decree followed by rehabilitation, administrative sanctions and execution of a decision to pay a sum of money.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this research is to analyze and discuss the forms of decisions of the State Administrative Court and the legal consequences if the State Administrative Officials do not carry out the execution of the decisions of the State Administrative Court. The writing method used is normative legal research using a statutory approach and the concept of legal analysis.Methods of the Research: This method using normative legal research methods, namely research conducted by studying literature or literature study related to the problems at hand.Results of the Research: The research results show that officials who do not carry out the obligations ordered in the decision of the State Administrative Court which have permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde) are subject to moderate administrative sanctions which include: a) forced payment and / or compensation; b) temporary dismissal by obtaining office rights; or c) temporary dismissal without obtaining office rights. Article 11 of Government Regulation Number 48 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Imposing Administrative Sanctions to Government Officials determines that the imposition of minor administrative sanctions is carried out directly by superior officials, while the imposition of moderate and / or severe administrative sanctions is carried out through an internal inspection mechanism. Regarding officials who are authorized to impose administrative sanctions regulated in Article 12 of Government Regulation Number 48 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Imposing Administrative Sanctions to Government Officials.
Co-Authors Agus Sujiono Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae Garciano Nirahua Muhammad Irham Natanel Lainsamputty